Re: [OSM-dev-fr] Bug plugin cadastre JOSM
Salut, Je ne connais pas se problème, mais une piste: as tu essayer l'OpenJdk 7 ? Après avoir installer plusieurs JVM (avec apt-get) tu peux basculer de l'une à l'autre avec l'outil $ sudo update-alternatives --config java Par exemple sur ma bécane: $ sudo update-alternatives --list java /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java bonne chasse Cyrille Le 15 mai 2013 19:21, Mickaël Guéret m.gue...@free.fr a écrit : Salut, j'ai un bug du plugin cadastre sous JOSM, je ne sais pas trop si c'est ma config qui déconne, j'aurais bien aimé avoir de l'aide car c'est vraiment génant... Symptômes : - j'utilise le cadastre depuis quelques minutes, dans une commune dont le cadastre est vectoriel. Je fais des rafraichissement régulier car je me déplace sur les feuilles. Et tout a coup, le chargement se bloque, j'ai une fenètre modale JOSM de titre téléchargement du cadastre de ..., le texte connexion au serveur de cadastre, une barre de progression et un bouton annuler qui ne fonctionne pas... Dans la console Java, j'ai le message GET http://www.cadastre.gouv.fr/scpc/accueil.do qui renvient en boucle... La seule façon de m'en sortir est de redémarrer JOSM -j'utilise le cadastre raster : si je télécharge une première feuille, ça marche correctement. Le téléchargement d'une seconde feuille me fait la même erreur que précédemment. Ma config : Debian Squeeze 64 bit JRE sun JRE 1.6.0.26 Merci d'avance ! Cordialement Mika_Guere ___ dev-fr mailing list dev-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev-fr -- Cyrille. ___ dev-fr mailing list dev-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev-fr
[Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #4860: my business address is shown in wrong location
#4860: my business address is shown in wrong location ---+ Reporter: NMaxwell | Owner: potlatch-dev@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: potlatch2 |Version: Keywords: | ---+ My business address is 298 E 300 N St Morgan UT. This website has me in wrong location. My actual Latitude is 41.043716, Longitude -111.677443. I have been working with several maps to get it updated. Business information. Neil O Maxwell - Farmers Insurance 298 e 300 N St Morgan UT 84050. Please update map so listings using openstreetmap.org for my listing can be corrected. Thanks -- Ticket URL: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4860 OpenStreetMap http://www.openstreetmap.org/ OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #4860: my business address is shown in wrong location
#4860: my business address is shown in wrong location + Reporter: NMaxwell | Owner: potlatch-dev@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: potlatch2 |Version: Resolution: invalid| Keywords: + Changes (by nicolas17): * status: new = closed * resolution: = invalid Comment: Tickets on this website are to report problems with the software, not with the map data. The correct way to report problems with the map is clicking 'Add note' at the bottom of the map, or you can ''edit the map yourself''. I was going to try fixing it for you, but you didn't say what the current wrong location is, so I can't find it. -- Ticket URL: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4860#comment:1 OpenStreetMap http://www.openstreetmap.org/ OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
On 15.05.13 23:34, Rob Nickerson wrote: For transparency I suggested that the SotM conference being promoted and for other events I suggested that we include a prominent events banner NACK to any promotion on the front page of osm.org. SOTM (international) ist the only thing that can be tolerated. Full stop. People refused to put the SOTM-EU logo there and I see the point (for anybody outside Europe). There are so many events over the year in different parts of the world (see the Wiki Main Page), it makes no sense to promote them on the front page. To everybody. It makes no sense that I (located in Vienna, Austria) am seeing an ad for an event in SF, CA. Or Toronto, Canada. Or Cape Town, South Africa. Or whatever. Nobody will pay me to get there. There could be an Events menu item on the front page of osm.org that links to some Current events page. This would make much sense. Even more since the Community menu item is dead (don't know what it should link to). /al ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
Hello Andreas, SotM-EU, in Vienna, was a wonderful event. You and your team did a great job organizing it and I'm really pleased to have been there. Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would now, because the policy has changed. The local event in the US is given equal time on the front page with SotM, and I expect that the Toronto events will be added to the mix shortly. I can't offer to pay for your trip to Toronto, Andreas, nor did you pay for mine to Vienna :-) You'll be welcome to join the growing list of esteemed, international guests who have joined us in Toronto for our local events. We're having our third (or 4th ?) special guest event of the year, in Toronto, next week. With visiting OSM-dignitaries from Europe. I expect that TomH will deploy the additional ad shortly. After all, the policy was changed and the requested tech is all in place. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
On 16 May 2013 13:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would now, because the policy has changed. SoTM-EU was 2011. If there was a policy change it was in 2012: Add a banner for SOTM US http://git.openstreetmap.org/rails.git/commitdiff/5f0c590c32565ffb807699df02c7ce8392513210 We also briefly ran a SOTM Scotland banner in 2012: http://git.openstreetmap.org/rails.git/commitdiff/749caaff73596e284c39ce7d0a840f8a0a50687d / Grant ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
On 16/05/13 13:05, Richard Weait wrote: Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would now, because the policy has changed. If policy has changed then could somebody please document what the new policy is so that I am able to apply it when considering your request? We're having our third (or 4th ?) special guest event of the year, in Toronto, next week. With visiting OSM-dignitaries from Europe. I expect that TomH will deploy the additional ad shortly. After all, the policy was changed and the requested tech is all in place. Please stop trying to drag me into your ridiculous argument. You know as well as I do that you are just trying to make some sort of point with this request because the CWG vote on Monday didn't go the way you wanted. The truly silly thing is that the CWG vote didn't actually have anything to do with the ads getting deployed, because I had already done that a hour or two earlier, based on the fact that discussion had petered out, time was somewhat of the essence, and nobody had objected to my suggestion the day before that I merge the pull request to add the two ads in random rotation. To be honest I'm still not exactly sure what CWG voted on, but I as far as I understand it the vote was simply about what to do right now with the outstanding pull request, and not about setting a long term policy on how to handle these things. In any event there is clearly a difference between advertising an annual conference that expects to have hundreds of delegates and advertising regular small scale meetups - whether the event has a geographical scope in the title is clearly not the only thing that any policy would need to consider. But anyway, the summary is that I do not want, and do not intend to become, any sort of referee in this ridiculous pissing contest. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 16/05/13 13:05, Richard Weait wrote: Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would now, because the policy has changed. If policy has changed then could somebody please document what the new policy is so that I am able to apply it when considering your request? That would be nice. Please stop trying to drag me into your ridiculous argument. You know as well as I do that you are just trying to make some sort of point with this request because the CWG vote on Monday didn't go the way you wanted. No, I'm trying to grow the local community for the benefit of the OpenStreetMap community at large. I support the CWG decision. The truly silly thing is that the CWG vote didn't actually have anything to do with the ads getting deployed, because I had already done that a hour or two earlier, based on the fact that discussion had petered out, time was somewhat of the essence, and nobody had objected to my suggestion the day before that I merge the pull request to add the two ads in random rotation. Ah, then there will be no problem with adding one more to the rotation. In any event there is clearly a difference between advertising an annual conference that expects to have hundreds of delegates and advertising regular small scale meetups - whether the event has a geographical scope in the title is clearly not the only thing that any policy would need to consider. So you'll only place ads for non-recurring events? Or that events should only have ads once they expect attendance n when it could be argued that they don't need an ad? :-) You think the aggregate influence of multiple events should be disregarded? That sounds strange in the context of somebody who adds pubs to the map one at a time over the course of years. But then, I'm an anti-importist. :-) And I'm certain that we'll have higher attendance numbers once our ad is up. But anyway, the summary is that I do not want, and do not intend to become, any sort of referee in this ridiculous pissing contest. Sorry, I'm not interested in such a contest. Please deploy the ad promptly. Time is of the essence. I'm sure other events will want and deserve prominent front page ad placement soon, as well. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page
Hi Sounds like this issue should be directed to the CWG to discuss, and define the guidelines and process more clearly. -Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com To: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu Cc: dev dev@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:21 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] SotM ads for front page On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 16/05/13 13:05, Richard Weait wrote: Sorry that you didn't get an ad on the front page then. Obviously you would now, because the policy has changed. If policy has changed then could somebody please document what the new policy is so that I am able to apply it when considering your request? That would be nice. Please stop trying to drag me into your ridiculous argument. You know as well as I do that you are just trying to make some sort of point with this request because the CWG vote on Monday didn't go the way you wanted. No, I'm trying to grow the local community for the benefit of the OpenStreetMap community at large. I support the CWG decision. The truly silly thing is that the CWG vote didn't actually have anything to do with the ads getting deployed, because I had already done that a hour or two earlier, based on the fact that discussion had petered out, time was somewhat of the essence, and nobody had objected to my suggestion the day before that I merge the pull request to add the two ads in random rotation. Ah, then there will be no problem with adding one more to the rotation. In any event there is clearly a difference between advertising an annual conference that expects to have hundreds of delegates and advertising regular small scale meetups - whether the event has a geographical scope in the title is clearly not the only thing that any policy would need to consider. So you'll only place ads for non-recurring events? Or that events should only have ads once they expect attendance n when it could be argued that they don't need an ad? :-) You think the aggregate influence of multiple events should be disregarded? That sounds strange in the context of somebody who adds pubs to the map one at a time over the course of years. But then, I'm an anti-importist. :-) And I'm certain that we'll have higher attendance numbers once our ad is up. But anyway, the summary is that I do not want, and do not intend to become, any sort of referee in this ridiculous pissing contest. Sorry, I'm not interested in such a contest. Please deploy the ad promptly. Time is of the essence. I'm sure other events will want and deserve prominent front page ad placement soon, as well. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] Street View Integration; OAuth 1.0a?
Hi, I'm new to the list, wanted to introduce myself. I'm Tac Tacelosky, a developer in Washington DC working on an editor that would allow people looking at panoramic images (aka street views), to create and edit OSM amenities and other elements. We are a North American distributor for a panoramic camera system, and I'm particularly excited about the possibility of integrating street views with OSM and how much faster we'll be able to populate the OSM database. I've taken about 15,000 panoramic pictures that we'll be posting soon that will be able to be used by OSM Mappers. I wanted to confirm that the API is still using OAuth 1.0 and not 1.0a or 2.0. Is there any development going on in that area? Or any recommendations / advice? Thanks, Tac ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Street View Integration; OAuth 1.0a?
On 16/05/13 17:47, Tac Tacelosky wrote: I wanted to confirm that the API is still using OAuth 1.0 and not 1.0a or 2.0. Is there any development going on in that area? Or any recommendations / advice? We support 1.0 and 1.0a but 1.0a is what you should target for any new application - we only continue to support 1.0 for certain legacy clients really. Yom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] Ads for front page - Proposed solutions
Hi, I have no idea what the CWG vote was on and I can't find the up to date minutes to check it. Despite this, you much surely recognise the issue. For example, even if we restrict the banners to just those promoting conferences then we could easily have a rotation of 5 or more banners: * SOTM * SOTM-EU * SOTM-US * OSM Plus * SOTM Scotland * etc.. Extend this to other non-conference meet-ups and the number could easily quadruple. == Possible Solutions == A good place to start is to improve the events page. At the moment we have the wiki events calendar and http://calendar.openstreetmap.org.uk/map . The wiki is complicated - I have no idea how to add an event to this, but things could be improved. This events page can then have it's own dedicated banner on osm.org. To help boost awareness, there are several solutions. Here in the West Midlands, UK, we keep an eye out for new active mappers and message those who are more active through the OSM messaging system. During the summer months we take our monthly meet-up on tour to increase participation in smaller towns away from Birmingham. This works well. Furthermore, we also keep an eye out for local Open Data / Hack days or similar, and try to ensure that at least one OSM member attends each event. I also believe that a email distribution list would help. The concern is that nobody has signed up to an email when they joined OSM so perhaps we cannot start emailing them without an opt in. This is not an issue for me as we can create a sign-up page and promote it on OSM.org for the next few months. The current OSM new member sign up procedure can be changed to include the opt-in for emails. In my opinion, you could have people sign up to two email distributions: 1. A general monthly OSM update (based on the monthly blogs that are already being written) 2. An events email. For this people sign up to receive monthly emails about events within a user specified geographical region (e.g. x miles/km of some point). Regrettably, my technical skills aren't up to much, so I would struggle to do the 2nd. I am however happy to help with the first if (i) Pascal, Dennis and the “Wochennotiz” guys are happy for me to repost some of their content, (ii) I get reassurances that I can advertise the email sign up via a banner on osm.org for a period of 3 to 6 months, and (iii) the new member sign up procedure is updated. Hope this inspires some more possible solutions, Rob ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Street View Integration; OAuth 1.0a?
Thanks, I've updated the wiki page at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OAuth#Usage_for_developers accordingly, before it said that only 1.0 was supported, not 1.0a. Tac On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: We support 1.0 and 1.0a but 1.0a is what you should target for any new application - we only continue to support 1.0 for certain legacy clients really. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
