Carlos Santana wrote on 11/13/2019 01:30:31 PM:
>
> Yes that’s fine to be “alongside” with the release, but I would not
> want to wait months for another release just get a minor update to the
jar
>
> I would prefer in addition to have a nightly jar built and easy to get.
>
We might be on
Yes that’s fine to be “alongside” with the release, but I would not want to
wait months for another release just get a minor update to the jar
I would prefer in addition to have a nightly jar built and easy to get.
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Bertrand
Thank you for your kind reviews!
Does the CI start automatically?
If not, I'll rebase the PR and run it myself.
2019년 11월 13일 (수) 오후 11:05, Rodric Rabbah 님이 작성:
> Thanks Seonghyun Oh for PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4646
> from September which adds the 'updated' field to the API
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:02 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...The jar can’t and should not be distributed as part of an Apache release...
It won't be an Apache Release but it's fine to distribute that jar as
a "compiled package" [1] alongside its released source code.
-Bertrand
[1]
I think we're ready for a new release - at the last community call we set a
goal of pushing out a release vote before the end of November. I expect
we'll take stock today on the community call and should be ready to follow
it up with a vote shortly thereafter.
Given some recent feedback and
Thanks Seonghyun Oh for PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4646
from September which adds the 'updated' field to the API response for whisk
assets.
I have reviewed the PR and approved it, and pending CI passing, intend to
merge it.
-r
+1 The jar can be build and made available as a nightly/dev artifact for quick
development and testing purposes for convenience.
Then provide the one liner command to get up and running, assuming jre and
docker is present :-)
The jar can’t and should not be distributed as part of an Apache
I did some experimentations with the docker in docker and ultimately I am
convinced it is actually better just to use the jar. I would then suggest to
distribute at least the precompiled jar instead of requiring to compile by
himself.
--
Michele Sciabarra
mich...@sciabarra.com
-
