I think we're ready for a new release - at the last community call we set a goal of pushing out a release vote before the end of November. I expect we'll take stock today on the community call and should be ready to follow it up with a vote shortly thereafter.
Given some recent feedback and questions about vagrant and compose, I'd like to see if we can remove vagrant from the docs (or entirely), and make sure the standalone controller is front and center on the README/getting started. -r On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:02 AM Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 The jar can be build and made available as a nightly/dev artifact for > quick development and testing purposes for convenience. > > Then provide the one liner command to get up and running, assuming jre and > docker is present :-) > > The jar can’t and should not be distributed as part of an Apache release. > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > > > On Nov 13, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Michele Sciabarra <mich...@sciabarra.com> > wrote: > > > > I did some experimentations with the docker in docker and ultimately I > am convinced it is actually better just to use the jar. I would then > suggest to distribute at least the precompiled jar instead of requiring to > compile by himself. > > > > -- > > Michele Sciabarra > > mich...@sciabarra.com > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > From: Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > > Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image? > > Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 6:00 AM > > > > Running standalone logic within a Docker would be tricky as there is > quite > > a bit of logic involved to use the right IP for inter docker > communications > > specially in Kafka and Api Gateway part. > > > > Hence currently we expect that to use standalone the user has at minimum > > JDK + Docker on the host > > > > Chetan Mehrotra > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:58 PM Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Docker in Docker has some slight security improvements depending on > >> your use case, too, compared to just mounting your docker socket into > >> the running container. > >> > >>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 10:30, Tyson Norris <tnor...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I suspect that due to Docker-in-Docker scenario, it will be easier to > >> use java+jar (+local docker) instead of running the jar in a container. > >>> > >>> Today you can start the jar with only java <jar>, but you will need a > >> bunch of parameters (probably different per OS?) to run it in a > container, > >> I think. > >>> Local docker client is switched per OS here > >> > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/231e739373ef681c44b5647a6956d5838a87db2e/core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/docker/StandaloneDockerContainerFactory.scala#L37 > >>> I guess this wouldn't apply if running in a container, but it arguably > >> makes running the jar simpler than running the container IMHO. > >>> I also suspect you won't get the behavior of launching playground ui to > >> browser either, which I would miss. > >>> > >>> Tyson > >>> > >>> On 11/9/19, 5:38 AM, "Michele Sciabarra" <mich...@sciabarra.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Wow. I missed those evolutions. So I guess it should not be hard to > >> package it as a docker image. > >>> > >>> To be able to say to people: execute "docker run -p 8080:8080 > >> openwhisk/standalone" and enjoy... > >>> > >>> If it is possible I can volounteer to write the dockerfile do > that... > >>> > >>> I have a question: does it use the local docker? Where is the > >> invoker? > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Michele Sciabarra > >>> mich...@sciabarra.com > >>> > >>> ----- Original message ----- > >>> From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> > >>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image? > >>> Date: Saturday, November 09, 2019 2:31 PM > >>> > >>> Do you mean the standalone controller? > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fopenwhisk%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fcore%2Fstandalone%2FREADME.md&data=02%7C01%7Ctnorris%40adobe.com%7Cfc313c39337a44a5882a08d7651a0cbc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637089034867332217&sdata=OCnWo8R5OfbKLaSQCEeI%2B7pqz0ewp%2BYQGBK2msMoMtc%3D&reserved=0 > >>> > >>> -r > >>> > >>>> On Nov 9, 2019, at 8:18 AM, Michele Sciabarra < > >> mich...@sciabarra.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello all, > >>>> > >>>> I remember the discussion about the openwhisk as a single > >> executable that includes also Kafka. So I wonder: is it now possible to > run > >> (for development purposes of course) OpenWhisk as single docker image > if we > >> add also couchdb to that one? Because I have an use case where even a > >> docker-compose can be inconvenient... > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Michele Sciabarra > >>>> mich...@sciabarra.com > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > >> >
