Hi,
Michele Sciabarra wrote:
> ...Since OpenWhisk is built on Akka, how this change will affect OpenWhisk?
FWIW, other ASF projects are impacted, see for example:
https://flink.apache.org/news/2022/09/08/akka-license-change.html
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-619
-Bertrand
Hi,
I have added that file in [1] as requested by ASF infra so that
openwhisk is green at https://infra-reports.apache.org/site-source/ -
that .asf.yaml is now required in the asf-site branch.
I have verified that the corresponding build commit did not change content [2].
-Bertrand
[1]
Welcome Alex!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alexander Klimetschek
wrote:
> ...In not so small parts because it was a fun thing to build - see more at
> [4]! And this is how I ended up here :-)
I was trying to remember when we first "met" around Apache and
lists.apache.org helped me find
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:02 PM Alexander Klimetschek
wrote:
> Bertrand wrote:
> > IIUC there's no bundling of ngrok with wskdebug and users have to download
> > ngrok separately?
> Not quite. Their npm client library is bundled with wskdebug, and this is
> licensed under BSD-2-Clause...
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:44 AM Alexander Klimetschek
wrote:
> Their npm library used in wskdebug has the BSD-2-Clause license (not MIT)
> [2], which should be fine for Apache.
> Not sure if that optional integration / use of their service needs another
> legal check for ASF?...
IIUC there's
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:35 AM Alexander Klimetschek
wrote:
> ...Note that the granted source code zip [1] still has the Adobe copyright
> headers.
> We would have to remove/replace them. Bertrand told me that I would have to
> do this
> during the contribution process...
Yes, as per
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:37 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...I don't think
> building the jar actually requires much more software on your machine than
> what is required to successfully run the jar, so the gap may be small...
And if there's a significant gap, a Docker image with build tools can
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:02 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...The jar can’t and should not be distributed as part of an Apache release...
It won't be an Apache Release but it's fine to distribute that jar as
a "compiled package" [1] alongside its released source code.
-Bertrand
[1]
, Hi,
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:00 PM Krzysztof Sobkowiak
wrote:
> ... * Do we have any resources (e.g. slides) I could base my presentation
> on?...
I have slides for an introduction to serverless and OpenWhisk at
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:36 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> ...This is one of the situations where having some sort of proposal
> process can help align the various people and technical considerations
> a bit easier than mailing lists and PRs. There are numerous other
> communities with similar
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:53 AM Rob Allen wrote:
> I see that the July board meeting of the ASF that took place yesterday
> contained this:
> > The following resolutions were passed unanimously:
...
> > Establish the Apache OpenWhisk Project (Dave Grove, VP)
...
Yes indeed and this means
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:40 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...draft link:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526932 ...
Looks good to me, thank you!
-Bertrand
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:48 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...Just a reminder, the chair is not a leadership role, but it it more a
> secretarial and admin role...
I was going to say that!
In extreme cases the chair might have to make decisions on behalf of
the PMC but in 19 years at Apache I
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:22 PM Chetan Mehrotra
wrote:
> ...Thoughts?..
I think we need better emoticon support on this list to express how
cool this is ;-)
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:16 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...Spark is one example that might be useful for reference, available at
> http://spark.apache.org/trademarks.html. It provides appropriate links to
> the ASF [3] and summarizes the key points of the policy...
That's a great example,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:59 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...I’m not sure why we don’t include tests
I don't know the details of those repositories but IMHO releases need
to include tests so they can be validated.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:24 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...In terms of the reliance on Slack - I think we've addressed this in
> the past and clarified the modes of communication on our project web
> page...
I haven't found it, not sure if it happened. Slack is mentioned at
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:05 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...I am asking you all, as you did for the Maturity model review, to please
> help develop/review/comment on these items as well:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526932 ...
I have removed the
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:56 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...Please check out the charter...
For the ${DESCRIPTION-AND-SCOPE} I think this is sufficient:
"a platform for building Serverless applications with Functions"
That statement is mostly meant to identify what the project is about,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:36 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...fwiw, I have to login to the OpenWhisk cwiki using `dgrove-oss` while I
> login to the incubator wiki using `dgrove`. I don't know why..
Cwiki recently changed to be backed by the ASF LDAP, I suppose one is
your old cwiki user and the
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:26 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...Please take a minute to vote on whether or not Apache OpenWhisk should
> graduate to a Top Level Project...
+1 with my incubation mentor hat on, OpenWhisk is ready to graduate.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:34 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...As you may know, GitHub announced sponsorship integration recently and
> repos can provide a sponsorship button [1] to facilitate connecting
> contributors/maintainers with donors
Assuming that can point to any URL I'd say making
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:50 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
>... You should now have edit access to the Wiki,..
Works indeed, thank you!
-Bertrand
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:13 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
> ...I can't seem to edit the wiki page, so you can add a signoff from me...
I also cannot edit
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115527317
although editing
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:22 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...The report needs to be submitted at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2019
Sorry that's https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/June2019
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 2:37 AM wrote:
> ...The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, June 05)...
Is anyone taking care of this?
The report needs to be submitted at
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:58 AM Dominic Kim wrote:
> ...it seems there are still some IBM proprietary
> resources such as "PG".
> But it is also being(or already have) replaced by open CI environment,
> Apache Jenkins VMs
What's PG?
-Bertrand
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:07 PM Martin Henke wrote:
> ...As Knative Build seems be on a dead end...
Wow, already? That stuff seems to be competing with JavaScript
frameworks in terms of short lifetimes these days ;-)
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:42 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...I didn’t see a [DISCUSS] thread before this [VOTE] thread..
Discuss threads are not a requirement, but if you actually have
something to discuss it's fair to ask for that of course.
Or, this pPMC could make them required *for this
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:40 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...we completely document which file types/rationale for any OW projec
> use of a short header:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
Cool - I wasn't aware of that when I remarked on
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:44 AM Dominic Kim wrote:
> ...Initially, I`ve naively thought of two options.
> 1. Including docs in core repo.
> 2. Including docs in cwiki or wiki in core repo. ...
To me a third option is blog posts, which have the advantage that they
don't need to be
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...Maybe that service can be a set of OpenWhisk Actions...that would
> avoid having to deploy additional services (outside of states
> persistence) while not having to make core changes...
FYI I have played more c
+1 for the release of the archives listed in the below rcverify log
(which includes
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/268).
This +1 can carry over to the general@incubator.a.o vote.
The following are false positives:
verifying license... failed (diff
Hi,
Incubation mentor hat on - I've seen a few pastebin and similar links
to rcverify logs recently in VOTE threads.
I think it's much better to include those logs inline so that they end
up in ASF mail archives (*).
They are the kind of things that might be needed if for any reason we
want to
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:24 PM Olivier Tardieu wrote:
> This is a call to vote on releasing version 0.11.0-incubating release
> candidate rc2 ...
+1 for the release of the sources.tar.gz archive listed below in the
rcverify output
(I tweaked the script to output the SHA512,
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 3:28 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> This is a call to vote on releasing version 1.13.0-incubating release
> candidate rc2 ...
+1 for the release of the sources.tar.gz archive listed below in the
rcverify output
(I tweaked the script to output the SHA512,
Hi,
+1 for the releases of the 3 packages listed below.
Checked signatures, digests and build with "gradle distDocker".
As things to fix for next time, which do not block this release IMO, I
see several source files using a short-form Apache license header:
// Licensed to the Apache Software
Hi Chetan,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:09 AM Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> ...We recently did a POC around executing actions deployed on OpenWhisk
> via AWS Lambda...
I think you forgot a link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inception ;-)
> ...3. Invoker can delegate execution to Lambda based on
Hi,
Thank you everybody for you replies.
I understand implementing this directly in OpenWhisk is challenging,
and especially this comment from Olivier:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:12 PM Olivier Tardieu wrote:
> ...Alternatively, the dynamic creation of trigger-like and rule-like things
> can be
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:53 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 12:07, James Thomas wrote:
> > Non-binding +1:
> > Matt Sicker
>
> I think this might be wrong now that I'm a mentor? Or does it only
> apply to the IPMC vote?...
Matt's vote is binding both here (as an incubation
Hi,
I'm looking at a way to execute long-running compositions of Actions,
including waiting for human inputs with long timeouts in the range of
several days.
The basic pattern is something like
wsk.suspend(someEvent)
// this line executes only after that someEvent is received
AFAIK
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:27 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> ...My suggestion as to how to improve this wouldn't be the daily digest.
> My suggestion would be to ensure any development conversations that
> take place on Slack should be recreated on the mailing lists...
I agree with the intention,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:37 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...Changed it yesterday to use the gen. ASF security email ...
Thanks! https://openwhisk.apache.org/security.html and
https://openwhisk.apache.org/ includes a "security" link at the bottom
which is good.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:03 AM Carlos Santana wrote:
...
> -1 to have yet another ML list secur...@openwhisk.apache.org ...
FWIW I was not saying that that list should exist, just that it *can*
exist if desired.
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:43 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> For security reports, ASF already have a process let's not improvise..
Agreed but it's fine for projects to have their own security page, as
long as the ASF process is followed.
>... Reported should send email to secur...@apache.org
Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
Google Summer of Code 2019 is on, and the ASF has been accepted as an
organization.
So OpenWhisk can host GSoC students, provided someone from the PPMC
agrees to be their mentor.
See the instructions below and if there are questions I should be able
to help, I've been a
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:17 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...Amazing that you can capture all that, everytime!...
Indeed, thanks for this!
And still I have a small request: it would be great to include links
to the PRs and tickets being discussed ("speak in URLs") so that
people who do not attend
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:33 AM Carlos Santana wrote:
>
> ...they don’t use the https url to the Apache
> openwhisk website
Good point, IMO the only URL to advertise is openwhisk.apache.org -
http or https is an implementation detail (and all redirects are in
place AFAICS) but "apache" is
Hi Matt,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 7:04 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> ...my name is Matt Sicker, and I've recently volunteered
> to be one of the mentors for this project
Thank you very much for this, you just doubled the number of mentors
for this podling and it's very welcome!
OpenWhisk is a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:15 PM David P Grove wrote:
> The source code artifact of openwhisk composer can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating-rc1/openwhisk-composer-0.10.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz
+1 for the release
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:25 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4272 ...
I have commented there - thanks for this initiative!
-Bertrand
Hi,
I have very little knowledge of OpenWhisk internals so bear with me if
this is not practical - but from a community point of view:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:38 PM Michele Sciabarra wrote:
> ...Again, all of this is a proposal. I won't be upset if there is not
> agreement
I think in
Hi Carlos,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:31 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...Can you find out how they set it up ?...
I have asked -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a4d0071104ad69a68870c8c40f8dca0b889ebbd565d3c68b88492b4b@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:12 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...Chetan suggested looking into Slack workspace export...
Coming back to this after a long time, looking at this month's Board
reports (the joys of being there ;-) I stumbled on daily Slack digests
that Apache Pulsar sends to their dev
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:03 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> The book is named learning OpenWhisk...
As discussed elsewhere that should preferably be "learning Apache
OpenWhisk", unless there are strong publisher constraints
More details at https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#books
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:42 AM Michele Sciabarra
wrote:
>
> Indeed I was thinking to create a docker account "openwhisk-contrib" to
> place those, let's say, unofficial images.
> I am not sure who should own this account...
Accounts with "openwhisk" in their name should be owned by the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:10 AM Felix Meschberger
wrote:
> ...I wonder, whether such a thing would not have a space in some sort of an
> „unsupported“
> contrib area ?...
Big +1, with my incubation mentor hat on - having modules which are
not guaranteed to be supported, nor part of the core
Hi Matt,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:32 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/353 ...
Thank you very much for this. I like it, with a few minor comments.
I'd prefer saying "Apache Releases" or "Apache OpenWhisk Releases"
instead of "Official
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...Your suggesting that when we do the next source release with a new version
> of the CLI we always include a disclaimer clarifying that the nightly
> binary “latest” is not the released version it should not be use...
No - what I
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...maybe the comment for the report is just that it took 5 months from the
> time Adobe made the financial donation to the ASF to the time that the
> machines were actually made available to us...
That's not what the report says IMO, but I'm
Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
This month's report [1] says
> ...It seems that Apache Infra. will not provide us servers to host a staging
> environment that would
> help us perform needed staging testing on Pull Requests...
Can someone clarify what's missing for this to happen?
Or point me to prior
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:40 PM David P Grove wrote:
>> ...I haven't checked all OpenWhisk repositories but there's also at least
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-cli/releases
>
> Here I think the problem is the 'latest' tag/release. This is actually a
> nightly build
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...I don't appear to have the permissions to edit this page [2]...
I see that you got access now, thanks for taking care of the report!
-Bertrand
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM Carlos Santana wrote:
> Bertrand wrote:
> >1) How to ensure someone following just this list can follow the
>> action...
> Bertrand for the information item I think best visible place would be the
> website, improve it with more info and guidance on how to
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...what you mean by releases directly from github
> without PMC votes?
> All our releases have gone thru Votes first and then publish into the
> Apache server, and link in the website.
>
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:00 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...it
> seems that our release process is being impeded by a lack of engagement
> from eligible voters on the IPMC mailing list...
I agree, and besides having more mentors one way to fix that is to graduate ;-)
>From my point of view as
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:52 PM David P Grove wrote:
> I cloned the September report, updated the basic statistics, and did a very
> fast first path. It needs more work.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97552251 ...
Note that the report should be filed
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:28 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...as long as it includes "Apache.OpenWhisk" (fully qual. name)
> in the path then it looks good to me as well
Same here, +1
-Bertrand
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:22 AM David P Grove wrote:
> ...Bertrand, I have listed you as the officer/member managing the donation in
> the IP clearance form. Please take a look at the IP clearance form and
> let me know if there are any changes/corrections I should make before I
> start
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:30 PM David P Grove wrote:
>... This is call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk
> 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer..
+1 for the release of
openwhisk-composer-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz with SHA512=
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 4:42 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...I started the vote now [1], made a note to tally it in 72 hours...
The vote passed, I have updated
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/openwhisk-composer.html
accordingly, the IP clearance is really complete now.
We
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:38 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...Did you get a chance to initiate the vote email on the IPMC list?...
Sorry, I had a crazy week and forgot that - I started the vote now
[1], made a note to tally it in 72 hours.
Any PPMC member could have started that vote,
Hi Matt,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:15 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...You may be unaware that at the end of this summer I created an initial
> pass of assessment against the maturity model and posted on our WIki here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Project+Maturity+Model
>
Hi OpenWhisk PPMC,
I think the project has been progressing nicely towards graduation,
electing a few people, making releases etc.
One way to keep track of this progress and to convince the Incubator
PMC that the project is ready to graduate is to do a self-assessment
based on
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:33 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is
> completed...
I checked and actually the IP clearance has not been completed, the
form at [1] needs to be approved by the Incubator PMC.
I'm happy to start that
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:49 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...In order to make OpenWhisk a real member of Apache, we need to make a
> overhaul for the package name existing in all openwhisk projects
Thank you for driving this!
Someone asked me off-list about the .NET code that's part of
Hi,
(replying to dev@ only, no need for a private conversation here)
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...I have documented the instruction to release openwhisk module under Apache
> as release manager at
>
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:40 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:20 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> > ...There are five contributors.
> > Of those, the four contributors from IBM already have Apache CLAs on file:
> > Olivier Tardieu,
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:20 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...There are five contributors.
> Of those, the four contributors from IBM already have Apache CLAs on file:
> Olivier Tardieu,
> Nick Mitchell, Kerry Chang and Rodric Rabbah
I agree that if all authors have Apache iCLAs on file,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:09 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...After everybody's great effort, OpenWhisk has now successfully releases all
> the 12 designated modules...
Thank you Vincent for driving this, and thanks to everyone involved!
-Bertrand
Hi,
> 2018-09 September (draft):
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=89071856
It's now at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2018 - thanks
for a very extensive report!
Would it make sense to move some of that information to regular blog
posts meant for the
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:53 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...
> 2018-09 September (draft):
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=89071856 ...
+1 to this report, thank you!
-Bertran
Hi OpenWhisk PPMC members,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:20 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Your report is late. It would be appreciated it if you can submit it ASAP...
Could someone from the PPMC create that report, or at least prepare a
draft here that we can finalize and post?
At
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:46 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...we will very quickly have runtimes having Apache
> releases on their own cadence and the version numbers won't align with each
> other or with openwhisk core...
FWIW we have a similar problem in Apache Sling which consists of many
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:04 AM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> The source code artifact of openwhisk wskdeploy can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating-rc1/openwhisk-wskdeploy-0.9.8-incubating-sources.tar.gz
+1 for this release,
Hi,
I'm surprised that nobody is voting on this - voting on releases is
not only for mentors, it's an essential function of Apache projects
that podlings need to practice. It's not hard ;-)
Not much fun either maybe, but
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/success-at-apache-the-apache1
Hi Markus,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:27 AM Markus Thömmes
wrote:
> ...From the ContainerRouter's
> PoV, a container is just an IP address + Port, so that concern is
> encapsulated in the ContainerManager...
Cool, thanks for confirming. This means the ContainerManager can do
whatever allocation
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:07 PM Markus Thömmes
wrote:
...
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/OpenWhisk+future+architecture
...
Very clear proposal, thank you! And thanks for bringing the discussion here.
Is the ContainerManager meant to support multiple underlying
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:12 PM Priti Desai wrote:
> Matt and I have spent past few weeks redesigning our website to cater it
> to three different types of users, Operators, Developers, and
> Contributors
I don't have time to look at the details right now but IIUC by
"Developers" you
Hi Matt,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:58 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
...
> http://openwhisk.apache.org/downloads.html
> It was quick and basic, but is in line with what is shown for other Apache
> projects; feel free to comment. ..
Thanks for setting up that page!
Direct links to /dist should not
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:47 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
>
> .. thought I was endorsing the Apache release process we have been working
> on in accordance with Apache policies... did you read into that statement
> otherwise?...
Apparently yes, sorry about that...I understood "tagged releases" to
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:23 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...working with @vincent to
> publish his key to avoid this:
>gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner
I'm not sure if
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:52 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...I have proposed a PR fixing all the issues raised in this mail thread:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/218 ...
I noticed the "Since this release does not ship the code of test
cases.." comment there.
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:22 AM Markus Thoemmes
wrote:
...
> - [✓] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. (Other than gradlew.jar)
> Is there a procedure to verify the last point? I quickly did a find for jar
> files and a find for executable files...
I also use find + file
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:27 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk
> 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
+1 for the release of openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz
with SHA512()=
Hi Rodric,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:52 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> > On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote:
> > ...I mean if only release this go client code, there is nothing we can run
> > it against.
> And that is entirely fine per all the ASF docs I’ve read. Is there a
>
Hi Matt,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...I am fine with making it "easier" for the Incubator board...
Nitpicking: there is no "Incubator Board" - there's the Incubator PMC,
which will review the OpenWhisk releases, and the Apache Software
Foundation Board, which has
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:41 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...As long as the ASF incubator people are happy with a release that doesn’t
> have the
> org.apache.openwhisk.* package name, it all seems fine
> Can we find out by asking first before getting slammed later?..
Initial podling releases
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:40 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...I looked through https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go
> and it is the entirely self contained -
> all go code, no deps on other openwhisk repos
Sounds like a good candidate for a first Incubator release indeed.
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:27 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> ...Are you saying you believe the Incubator PMC
> will fail us strictly due to having 13 tgz/tar files vs. 1 for a first
> release?...
I don't know (and someone's welcome to ask on the
general@incubator.a.o list to find out), but
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
