Re: [OT] EAPI strangeness

2002-06-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > OK, I'm applying the following diff. Does it make sense to you? (I'm > completely lost as to why I need to do this, so any guidance is most > welcome!) looks right to me. same issues that have been plaguing modperl itself ever since 5.6.0 was relea

Re: [OT] EAPI strangeness

2002-06-03 Thread Matt Sergeant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 04 June 2002 12:25 am, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > Seems to be I think - but then this isn't a bug I've been able to > > replicate. I asked the person to try recompiling with an explicit -DEAPI > >

Re: [OT] EAPI strangeness

2002-06-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Seems to be I think - but then this isn't a bug I've been able to replicate. I > asked the person to try recompiling with an explicit -DEAPI and it made no > difference. AxKit uses Apache::src to get the headers and CFLAGS. > > Does the request_rec c

Re: [OT] EAPI strangeness

2002-06-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry for the off topic post, but I'm not sure where else to post... > > Has anyone here ever seen "bugs" with requests on an EAPI enabled Apache where > r->per_dir_config is NULL? I haven't managed

[OT] EAPI strangeness

2002-06-03 Thread Matt Sergeant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for the off topic post, but I'm not sure where else to post... Has anyone here ever seen "bugs" with requests on an EAPI enabled Apache where r->per_dir_config is NULL? I haven't managed to replicate the bug yet, but a number of AxKit users a