[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2961) select on a composite primary key fails when DESC is set in the table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dhiraj Hegde updated PHOENIX-2961: -- Description: I created a table with a primary key composed of 4 fields. The table specifies

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2892) Scan for pre-warming the block cache for 2ndary index should be removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319901#comment-15319901 ] Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-2892: I've added batching in https://github.com/enis/YCSB,

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319785#comment-15319785 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-2965: [~julianhyde], complete agree. I'll file a separate

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-2965: --- Attachment: 2965-v2.txt -v2 should work. Keeping track of the emptyAggregate state is a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319776#comment-15319776 ] Julian Hyde commented on PHOENIX-2965: -- Agreed, composite distinct count (and indeed composite

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319760#comment-15319760 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-2965 at 6/8/16 12:19 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319760#comment-15319760 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-2965: Looking around a bit, it turns out that many SQL

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319755#comment-15319755 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-2965: Wait... The NPE doesn't come out of my code. Stock 4.8

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-2965: --- Attachment: 2965.txt W.I.P. fails with an NPE. > Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319231#comment-15319231 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2940: - {quote} bq.If the client-side cache is too small, then

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319195#comment-15319195 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2940: - bq. How about if we make the size of the stats cache

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2901) If namespaces are enabled, check for existence of schema when sequence created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319178#comment-15319178 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-2901: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2276) Creating index on a global view on a multi-tenant table fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2276: --- Labels: SFDC (was: SFDC verify) > Creating index on a global view on a multi-tenant table

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2973) Table can not be dropped if Local Index is created on view on multi-tenant table

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-2973: -- Summary: Table can not be dropped if Local Index is created on view on multi-tenant table Key: PHOENIX-2973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2973

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2972) Index creation failed when tried created without tenantId on multi-tenant table view.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Samarth Jain resolved PHOENIX-2972. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Index creation failed when tried created without tenantId on

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2972) Index creation failed when tried created without tenantId on multi-tenant table view.

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-2972: -- Summary: Index creation failed when tried created without tenantId on multi-tenant table view. Key: PHOENIX-2972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2972

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2901) If namespaces are enabled, check for existence of schema when sequence created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2901: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-2901_v2.patch Thanks [~samarthjain] for review. please find the updated

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66113124 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318918#comment-15318918 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318915#comment-15318915 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66113006 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66099747 --- Diff: bin/queryserver.py --- @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ # The command is run through subprocess so environment variables are automatically

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66099573 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318749#comment-15318749 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318741#comment-15318741 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318735#comment-15318735 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66099062 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318724#comment-15318724 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2535: - bq. is it ready to be committed? No, not quite, but I think

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318722#comment-15318722 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user ss77892 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66097640 --- Diff: bin/queryserver.py --- @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ # The command is run through subprocess so environment variables are automatically inherited

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318719#comment-15318719 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to using temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318718#comment-15318718 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2970: --- How about just increasing the amount of global memory

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66097370 --- Diff: phoenix-assembly/src/build/components/all-common-jars.xml --- @@ -88,12 +93,12 @@ ${project.basedir}/../phoenix-server/target/ ---

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318706#comment-15318706 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66096699 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding PHOENIX-1734

I don't understand why HBASE-15600 is needed if we're ok with the local index updates not being transactional with older versions of HBase. Why can't we do the htable.batch() call in ParallelWriterIndexCommitter as we do now? The row keys are different. If this is an issue, then we could just

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66093991 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66094212 --- Diff: bin/queryserver.py --- @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ # The command is run through subprocess so environment variables are automatically

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66094042 --- Diff: phoenix-server/pom.xml --- @@ -7,52 +30,98 @@ 4.8.0-HBase-1.2-SNAPSHOT phoenix-server - Phoenix Query Server -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318685#comment-15318685 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #159: PHOENIX-2535 Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/159#discussion_r66094488 --- Diff: phoenix-client/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318682#comment-15318682 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318680#comment-15318680 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318678#comment-15318678 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2535: - Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull

Regarding PHOENIX-1734

Hi Team, As you know prior to PHOENIX-1734 we are storing all local index data in separate table and colocate data and index regions. To ensure proper colocation we need customer balancer, custom split and merge logic still these will not ensure 100% colocation. That's why we started working

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to using temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than 0.98.17 would

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2209) Building Local Index Asynchronously via IndexTool fails to populate index table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318564#comment-15318564 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2209: --- I suppose there's no other good option here, since no

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2971) ip banned by phoenix.apache.org

enjoyor created PHOENIX-2971: Summary: ip banned by phoenix.apache.org Key: PHOENIX-2971 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2971 Project: Phoenix Issue Type: Wish

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2967) CSV BulkLoad should properly handle empty family for logical tables.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318458#comment-15318458 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2967: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1245 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2535) Create shaded clients (thin + thick)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318258#comment-15318258 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2535: [~sergey.soldatov] has updated the pull request with

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to using temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than than 0.98.17

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to using temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to using temp file

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2596) Asynchronous Local Index is not available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318251#comment-15318251 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2596: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1244 (See

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to use temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservatively , which leads to use temp file

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative , which leads to use temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative , which leads to use temp file

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative ,and it leads to use temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative ,and it leads to use temp file

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative,and it lead to use temp file unnecessaryly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative,and it lead to use temp file

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than than 0.98.17

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than than 0.98.17

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than than 0.98.17

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenglei updated PHOENIX-2970: -- Description: Even if SpoolingResultIterator will be deprecated, but HBase older than than

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2970) SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative

chenglei created PHOENIX-2970: - Summary: SpoolingResultIterator using memory too conservative Key: PHOENIX-2970 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2970 Project: Phoenix Issue

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2969) Wrong default constant variable for METADATA_HANDLER_COUNT_ATTRIB

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bing Jiang updated PHOENIX-2969: Attachment: PHOENIX-2969.diff > Wrong default constant variable for METADATA_HANDLER_COUNT_ATTRIB

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2969) Wrong default constant variable for METADATA_HANDLER_COUNT_ATTRIB

Bing Jiang created PHOENIX-2969: --- Summary: Wrong default constant variable for METADATA_HANDLER_COUNT_ATTRIB Key: PHOENIX-2969 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2969 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2209) Building Local Index Asynchronously via IndexTool fails to populate index table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317995#comment-15317995 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2209: --- We're making too many special cases for local indexes all

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2596) Asynchronous Local Index is not available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317984#comment-15317984 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-2596: -- Thanks [~jamestaylor] for reviews.