Re: RC on Monday

2016-06-21 Thread larsh
PHOENIX-3014, PHOENIX-3012 have been pushed. Good to go on those. From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:40 AM Subject: Re: RC on Monday A couple more to get in: PHOENIX-3014, PHOENIX-3012,

Re: [DISCUSS] name next release 5.0 or 4.8?

2016-06-23 Thread larsh
Bit belated... For what's it worth, I'm fine either way. I'd be leaning towards 5.0, since forcing synchronized client and server upgraded for any feature is tricky for many organizations.The new major version number would be a warning flag. Or phrased differently, if this does not warrant 5.0,

Re: Tephra fails with missing data.tx.snapshot.dir, even though it's in the server's hbase-site.xml

2016-03-18 Thread larsh
Gr. Some of the -test jars that ship with the Phoenix build contain an hbase-site.xml and hence the settings are lost.If I remove all the test jars things are fine. So it seems I cannot run tephra against a tar that built myself, unless I remove all the -test jars. Then I tried the

Re: Tephra fails with missing data.tx.snapshot.dir, even though it's in the server's hbase-site.xml

2016-03-18 Thread larsh
And turns out I also need to remove the pherf jars from Phoenix's lib dir.I think we change the tephra script to automatically not include those. -- Lars From: "la...@apache.org" To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; "la...@apache.org"

Tephra fails data.tx.snapshot.dir, even though it's the server's hbase-site.xml

2016-03-18 Thread larsh
I built phoenix-0.4.7-0.98 from source and I am trying start tephra. I added       data.tx.snapshot.dir     /tmp/tephra/snapshots         data.tx.timeout     60   To the server's hbase-site.xml and export HBASE_HOME to point the HBase install. I double and triple checked this. Yet,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

2016-07-14 Thread larsh
+1 (binding). Compiled from source. Loaded about 100m rows, queried, flushed, compacted, etc. Retested all the features that I added. Looks all good, nothing undue in the logs. From: Ankit Singhal To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:54

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-07-05 Thread larsh
All good discussions. IMHO what matters most initially is to get more frequent and smaller releases. The effect is a more steady commit stream, more stable releases, and earlier access to bugfixes (and features) for users. The patch/minor cadence will likely emerge a function of that, we'll see

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-07-05 Thread larsh
Oh as you know, I am a very big fan of clearly defined patch/minor/major compatibility.I'd love to have something like what we now have for HBase for Phoenix as well. (could view it as debt paid forward if we want to really consider merging the PMCs :) ) -- Lars From: Nick Dimiduk

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-07-07 Thread larsh
Agreed. On all counts. There are some bigger changes in the pipeline (column remapping and "dense" column storage).Those are powerful and combine the power of SQL and HBase quite nicely. I propose we get those soon after 4.8 and then spin a 4.9 from those. A 4.8.1 would be of great value as

Re: where are we at with the RC?

2016-07-07 Thread larsh
I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it. If it's not an issue we can move to 4.9. From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; Mujtaba Chohan Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-07-09 Thread larsh
+1 on 4.8.x should support HBase 1.0. (although it would safe us maintenance of For 4.9 we can drop that (but likely should pull in support for HBase 1.3).We'll need to continue with 0.98 support until 0.98 is EOL'd, I think. I'm happy to do 4.8.1 and 4.9 for one release, to confirm Stack's

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-07-10 Thread larsh
0.94 never took that much time from me.Sure some days it's a lot of work, but on average I found it a task that can be easily done on the side. I relied a lot on the Apache Jenkins, triggering runs and checking back the next day, etc.I also think you're more diligent in your RM duties :) --

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1

2016-08-05 Thread larsh
-1 Sorry. See PHOENIX-3156. My doing. -- Lars From: Ankit Singhal To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:28 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1 Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1. This is

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1

2016-08-05 Thread larsh
I have a fix. Please review. Then we should spin a new RC. From: "la...@apache.org" To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 7:50 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1 -1 Sorry. See PHOENIX-3156. My

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2

2016-08-07 Thread larsh
+1 - Built from source- Did various tests, including perf- looks all good. Let's get this sucker out. From: Ankit Singhal To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 2:19 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2 Hello Everyone, This is a

Re: where are we at with the RC?

2016-06-30 Thread larsh
PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in. -- Lars From: Samarth Jain To: dev Cc: Ankit Singhal Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC? PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is

Re: where are we at with the RC?

2016-07-02 Thread larsh
OK... If you guys agree, I'll volunteer, and shoot for a 4.9 (or 4.8.1, or 5.0, whatever we decide to name it) release one month after 4.8.(The one complicating factor... I will be traveling a bit this coming month). -- Lars From: James Taylor To:

Re: where are we at with the RC?

2016-07-02 Thread larsh
I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it. -- Lars From: Ankit Singhal To: James Taylor Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; Samarth Jain ; Rajeshbabu

Re: where are we at with the RC?

2016-07-01 Thread larsh
Hi all, This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less strict monthly release train. It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the number of changes).In addition folks

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-08-15 Thread larsh
Should we put this up for a vote? There are a few "conditions" that need to be met, IMHO, to be successful with a monthly release cadence. 1. Ability to skip releases. When we do monthly releases we can not expect user to follow along. So it has to be possible to upgrade straight from (say)

Re: [DISCUSS] RM for next release

2016-08-17 Thread larsh
Great. Can somebody make me an administrator for Phoenix in Jira?I am for HBase but not for Phoenix. -- Lars From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; lars hofhansl Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:45 AM

Re: Issues while Running Apache Phoenix against TPC-H data

2016-08-19 Thread larsh
Thanks John. How was the region server Java process' heap configured?(Mujtaba is out today, not sure he'll listen in before Monday) On our regular SKUs we configure the region servers with 31GB of heap (the machines have more RAM than that), but I am not sure about which test cluster we used

Re: Issues while Running Apache Phoenix against TPC-H data

2016-08-19 Thread larsh
I think Stack it trying to help and was just asking whether Mujtaba did something special to load the data (and perhaps how it took for us and on how many nodes we did that).(If it loaded fine for us and there was nothing special we had to do, I agree that there's no way (or need) to

[DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9

2016-08-20 Thread larsh
The HBase 1.0.x branch has been EOL'd, I propose we drop support for it with Phoenix 4.9.I'd also propose that should HBase have a stable 1.3.x release soon, we should support it with Phoenix 4.9. -- Lars

4.8.1, 4.9.0, 4.9.1, and 4.10.0

2016-08-20 Thread larsh
Hi All, as we're two active branches right now, it is important to remember (1) that fixes are pushed to both 4.8xxx and 4.x branches and (2) that the jiras are marked as such, i.e. with 4.8.1 and 4.9.0. Also, there are currently 129 unresolved jiras against 4.9.0.It would be great if folks go

Re: new 4.8.0 RC?

2016-08-03 Thread larsh
What I do to allow commit even while running the tests is to create a tag in tag and then run jenkins against that tag instead of a branch. -- Lars From: Ankit Singhal To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 1:35 AM Subject: Re: new 4.8.0

Starting to think about 4.8.1

2016-09-07 Thread larsh
I'd like to have an RC out within 10 days, to start a regular monthly cadence. Just checked jira. There are 21 items fixed, and 30 items either open or patch-available.I'll do a pass through all the open issues. It would be great if everybody could go through their jira's and push issue they

Re: Starting to think about 4.8.1

2016-09-07 Thread larsh
I meant: "It would be great if everybody could go through their jira's and push issues they won't get to within 10 days to 4.8.2 OR unschedule those from 4.8, to mark them as 4.9 only". Also, please make sure that jira is up to date. If a fix was committed to the 4.x/master and the 4.8

Re: Starting to think about 4.8.1

2016-09-08 Thread larsh
I committed my two outstanding issues, and made a pass through the jira and pushed some to 4.8.2. 18 issues are still assigned to 4.8.1, please have a look. I'll do another more aggressive pass early next week. -- Lars From: "la...@apache.org" To:

Re: Starting to think about 4.8.1

2016-09-08 Thread larsh
And thanks to everybody who committed some of their jiras since my last email. -- Lars From: "la...@apache.org" To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 2:00 PM Subject: Re: Starting to think about 4.8.1 I committed

[VOTE] The first rc (RC0) for Phoenix 4.8.1 is available

2016-09-22 Thread larsh
Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The first RC for Apache Phoenix 4.8.1 is available. This is a patch release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following 43 issues:     [PHOENIX-1367] - VIEW derived from another VIEW doesn't use

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9

2016-08-27 Thread larsh
I think we need to keep 1.0 for 4.8.x. From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; lars hofhansl Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:06 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9 What about

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9

2016-08-26 Thread larsh
RIP 4.x-1.0. It's toast. From: "la...@apache.org" To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:59 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9 I'll take this as a vote. If you feel we need an "official" vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop HBase 1.0 support for 4.9

2016-08-23 Thread larsh
I'll take this as a vote. If you feel we need an "official" vote thread, speak up now.If I do not hear anything I'll remove the 4.x-1.0 branch in the next few days. Thanks. -- Lars From: Josh Elser To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 7:54 AM

Re: 4.8.1, 4.9.0, 4.9.1, and 4.10.0

2016-08-22 Thread larsh
Thanks Josh. Just to be clear, I did not mean that all issues should be assigned to 4.9.0 and 4.8.1, but only those issues that represent minor and backwards compatible fixes. (I know you know this, but for the sake of others). -- Lars From: Josh Elser To:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.8.1 is available for download

2016-09-27 Thread larsh
The Phoenix Team is pleased to announce the immediate release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.1. Download it from your favorite Apache mirror [1]. Apache Phoenix 4.8.1 a bug fix release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following

Re: [VOTE] The first rc (RC0) for Phoenix 4.8.1 is available

2016-09-27 Thread larsh
With 4 +1's (including mine) and no -1 the vote passes.I will release RC0 as Phoenix 4.8.1 On to 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 :) -- Lars From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; lars hofhansl Sent: Monday, September 26,

Re: [VOTE] The first rc (RC0) for Phoenix 4.8.1 is available

2016-09-24 Thread larsh
My key is the KEYS file in the dev directory only. Will load into KEYS file you mention. My key's fingerprint is A1A7 5143 64FB 05BC C9A1  5A9D D0BE B8C5 C7CF E328. -- Lars From: Josh Elser To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 2:48 PM Subject:

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC1

2016-11-07 Thread larsh
Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The second RC for Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 is available. This is a patch release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following 17 issues:     [PHOENIX-2996] - Process name of PQS should indicate its

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC0

2016-11-06 Thread larsh
Due to PHOENIX-3439 Will spin a new release tomorrow. From: "la...@apache.org" To: Dev Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 1:53 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC0 Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The first RC for Apache Phoenix

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC0

2016-11-04 Thread larsh
Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The first RC for Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 is available. This is a patch release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following 17 issues:     [PHOENIX-2996] - Process name of PQS should indicate its

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC2

2016-11-22 Thread larsh
Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The third RC for Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 is available. This is a patch release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following 26 issues:     [PHOENIX-2996] - Process name of PQS should indicate its

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC1

2016-11-11 Thread larsh
If this is not a new issue introduced with 4.8.2. it does not necessarily have to sink the release, it'd just get fixed next month. This seems bad, though, so I agree. -- Lars From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" ; lars hofhansl

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC1

2016-11-11 Thread larsh
From: "la...@apache.org" To: Dev Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 1:31 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC1 Hello Fellow Phoenix'ers, The second RC for Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 is available. This is a patch release for the

Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

2016-11-02 Thread larsh
Need to wait PHOENIX-3432 in both branches. From: "la...@apache.org" To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:27 PM Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 I'll clean up Jira for 4.8.2 and spin the RCs. Today and/or early

Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

2016-11-02 Thread larsh
Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include the column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2 I'll spin an RC today. -- Lars From: Andrew Purtell To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Cc: lars

Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

2016-11-02 Thread larsh
Great. 14 fixes in a patch release. That's a healthy number. Andy, didn't react to your earlier offer... Did you want to do the 4.8.2 release? Fine either way. -- Lars From: Samarth Jain To: dev ; la...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday,

Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

2016-11-02 Thread larsh
I'll clean up Jira for 4.8.2 and spin the RCs. Today and/or early tomorrow. From: James Taylor To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" Cc: lars hofhansl Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:00 PM Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0

2016-10-15 Thread larsh
Hi All, we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important enough ... and over 200 against 4.9.0. I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As before I'll volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0. Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're vastly

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 is available for download

2016-12-07 Thread larsh
The Phoenix Team is pleased to announce the immediate release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2. Download it from your favorite Apache mirror [1]. Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 a bug fix release for the Phoenix 4.8 release line, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2. This release fixes the following

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC2

2016-12-06 Thread larsh
Yeah... Sorry *very* busy. Will call the vote, do the release, and announce. -- Lars From: Josh Elser To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC2 Hey Lars, Is a +1 from yourself to

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC2

2016-12-06 Thread larsh
The vote passed with 3 +1's, no 0 or -1. We will release 4.8.2RC2 as Phoenix 4.8.2 From: Thomas D'Silva To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:23 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.2 RC2 +1 Ran integration tests.