Let's not introduce yet another way to do such things ... these annotations
seem to work fine and we/I've used them all over the place to make the
testsuite runnable in all sorts of different scenarios.
So-far we have:
- RequireInternetConnection
- RequireNonCaptureAllDns
- RequirePcap
-
Also one can use „assumeThat()“ in junit for such things.
> Am 06.04.2020 um 10:25 schrieb Julian Feinauer :
>
> Nice, then thats the way to go!
>
> Am 06.04.20, 10:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
>
>I've already got an annotation you can use:
>@RequirePcap together with a Junit
Nice, then thats the way to go!
Am 06.04.20, 10:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
I've already got an annotation you can use:
@RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the
condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... just
fixing
I've already got an annotation you can use:
@RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the
condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... just
fixing it.
Chris
Am 06.04.20, 10:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hey,
I would not
Hey,
I would not choose 1, as you say.
Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is with
junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap.
Julian
Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi,
I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck
