Thanks Cesar, will do the same. Not sure some one already tested Modbus
driver to retrieve holding register data, if some one did plz let us know
about this issue.Regards,
On Wednesday, May 27, 2020, Cesar Garcia wrote:
> Ok,
>
> For tomorrow I will take the time to test the new
Ok,
For tomorrow I will take the time to test the new version and I will take a
step by step.
Best regards,
El mar., 26 may. 2020 a las 23:42, venki hadoop ()
escribió:
> Sure Cesar,
> was unable to attach my program due to size
> restrictions. But 1st am testing to
ottobackwards opened a new pull request #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/160
… fu between all supported versions
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
chrisdutz merged pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/159
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Hi,
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Justin
Sure Cesar,
was unable to attach my program due to size
restrictions. But 1st am testing to retrieve holding resgister variable
locally, then will in corporate into my logstash plugin I already
implemented for OPC ua server signal simulator. Please find imp code:
ottobackwards merged pull request #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/160
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Hello,
I'm glad it worked.
Sure if you put your example code, we can help you test it.
Best regards,
El mar., 26 may. 2020 a las 22:53, venki hadoop ()
escribió:
> Hello Cesar,.
>Was able to configure device and signal function based
> on above instructions.
> But am
Hello Cesar,.
Was able to configure device and signal function based
on above instructions.
But am unable to retrieve value, am assuming due to version issue, today
will update to 0.7.0 and test then will update you.
Regards,
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020, Cesar Garcia wrote:
>
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [909]':
Is back to normal.
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [908]':
Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/908/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop
[develop] [908]"
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [907]':
Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/907/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop
[develop] [907]"
Yes I did release them ... I can see them in Apache-Central, but not
Maven-Central.
I asked on the infra slack to see if there is anything holding up the sync.
Till then ... which Maven version are you using? I think in really new Maven
versions the default has switched to use the Apache repo
Indeed its not there yet.
@Christofer Dutz did you already release the maven repo?
Julian
Am 26.05.20, 10:23 schrieb "venki hadoop" :
Hi Chris,.
Is it will be part of maven central repo( I haven't
found 0.7 version in repository) or we have to build from source?
Hi Chris,.
Is it will be part of maven central repo( I haven't
found 0.7 version in repository) or we have to build from source?
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi Venki,
>
> Well I guess it would be an option ... I would give that a try and if you
> run
Hi Venki,
Well I guess it would be an option ... I would give that a try and if you run
into problems try with 0.6.0 in order to help track down if there's a
regression.
The Modbus driver is actually one we had an external driver in the past and
which is now replaced by a full implementation
Hi Chris,.
Shall we use 0.7.0 version to resolve this issue.
Regards,
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I guess you are using one of the "old generation" drivers (As you say it's
> working and the address seems to imply that).
>
Don't think we need a vote here ... I think we also discussed the matter one or
two times before and no one objected.
So I'd say as soon as Justin says we're ok with the ASF rules, I think we
should add it and then also do some social media initiative asking people to
give back by getting
Hi,
yes. Just wanted to add my point here : )
But of course some feedback is very welcome about best practices.
Perhaps we could even hold a formal vote to give it the necessary attention on
the list?
Julian
Am 26.05.20, 09:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi Julian,
I like the name
Hi Julian,
I like the name "adopters" ... sounds better than "users" especially if it's on
the "users" part of the website.
I would like some feedback from some other ASF folks as in the past they have
brought up concerns and I would prefer to hear if they are ok with this.
Chris
Am
Hi Chris,
thanks for tackling this.
I really like it and in fact I woul dprobably place it even more prominent.
I like how eclipse IoT Working Group did it:
https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/
I see no reason why this would not comply with ASF policy.
Julian
Am 25.05.20, 21:43 schrieb
21 matches
Mail list logo
