Re: [VOTE] Create plc4x-extras repository

+1 Am Sa., 23. März 2024 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Björn Haverland < bjo...@coding-nexus.com>: > +1 > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android > > From: Christofer Dutz > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2024 4:49:17 PM > To: dev@plc4x.apache.org >

Re: [DISCUSS] What do we want to look into/talk about on the Meetup/Workshop?

Mine are much simpler: - Merge my pull request * https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/1419 should be 5-10 minutes with Sebastian. - Go through PLC4PY with Ben and get things running on my side * Add Pip Package to https://pypi.org/ including release integration etc. * What is missing for

Re: So when do we want to meet on Saturday?

Hi all, according to my travel plans. My train arrives in Frankfurt Main Station at 14:00. Connection on Sat. 23.03.2024 - from Oerestad st, departure 00:46 Gl. 2 with IC 1401 - to Frankfurt(Main)Hbf, arrival 14:00 Gl. 6 with ICE 75 Verbindung ansehen:

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.12.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Lukas - otluk [x] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [x] Verify the signature is correct. [x] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [x] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [x] Unzip the archive. [x] Verify the existence of

Re: [CANCELED][VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.12.0 RC1

-1 (binding) Found the mentioned issue and can confirm that I can not build from source. Lukas [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [OK] Verify the signature is correct. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify

Re: [DISCUSS] How about releasing 0.12.0?

+1 for releasing as we have closed so many issues. and we have now a proper Linkedin Page to announce ;-) Am Mi., 14. Feb. 2024 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > so in the past few weeks we managed to cut the number of open issues by > half and

Re: [DISCUSS] How about registering a profile for ApachePLC4X on LinkedIn?

+1 As we would mainly follow other Apache projects like: - https://www.linkedin.com/company/apache-streampipes/ - https://www.linkedin.com/company/apachespark/ - https://www.linkedin.com/company/apache-beam/ - https://www.linkedin.com/company/apache-airflow/ -

Re: [DRAFT] December board report

Thank you Chris! Christofer Dutz schrieb am Do., 14. Dez. 2023, 08:35: > Ok … report is published, > > I added a point about Lukas’ work on the OPC-UA secure-connection part. > > Chris > > Von: Christofer Dutz > Datum: Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2023 um 09:10 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff:

Re: [VOTE] Drop Java 1.8 Support

+1 Otto Fowler schrieb am Mo., 11. Dez. 2023, 04:26: > +1 binding > > On December 8, 2023 at 9:16:19 AM, Christofer Dutz ( > christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: > > Hi all, > > in the past we have settled with requiring Java 11 for building plc4x and > making sure the libraries we build are

Re: Convert the Milo-based test suite into one using our integration-test framework?

+1 for disabling Milo, we should be able to build with docker compose up without running into these issues. If someone needs Milo test then actively enabling them seems like a reasonable plan. Lukad Christofer Dutz schrieb am Mo., 25. Sept. 2023, 10:59: > Hi Lukasz, > > Well … we need a

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.7.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Built on Linuxmint - LMDE 6 using openjdk 17.0.8 2023-07-18 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8+7-Debian-1deb12u1) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0.8+7-Debian-1deb12u1, mixed mode, sharing) Lukas [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release

Re: Connection Issue with Siemens PLC via OPC UA

Hi Antonio, Welcome to the PLC4X Community. Can you add some more details how you are using the library. You can also add more details as GitHub Issue. So we need the connection string you are using and potentially the actual error messages you are receiving. For instance are you sure you are

Re: Update the S7 driver to only say "subscriptions supported" for S7 devices that actually support it?

+1 , yes indeed it seems obviously misleading. Am Mi., 14. Juni 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi, > > Again, a user seems to have been mis-led by > “plcConnection.getMetadata().canSubscribe()”. > I think we need to return a different value here based

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding a Publish-API?

+1 to add a Publish API. I think so too that we really have a need for an API like that to support Pub-Sub Protocols like MQTT and AMQP in a more natural way. Lukas Am Mi., 31. Mai 2023 um 14:32 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I’m currently contining to

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

Hi, I personally started using GitHub Discussions and I am really a fan of it as it seamlessly integrates with our code repository. Especially as Confluence is not so visible and the linking and switching from an article to an issue and vice versa. So I am in favor as well. Plus we would have

Re: [DISCUSS] Have some sort of multi-connection?

+1 for building a more generic solution for multi-connections as it helps for PROFINET and ADS as well Am Fr., 5. Mai 2023 um 15:17 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > while going through Cesar’s changes I noticed that he actually addressed > something I keept

Re: Need help to figure Dependency and Project work flow-regards

Hi Laveenkumar, Welcome to the PLC4X Project. Sorry I do not understand your question. First can you tell us which language you are trying to use? - Java - Go or C? (are you trying to deploy PLC4C on an Arduino?) Second we can not see any links. Please provide a code example or some more

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we remove the PLC4X Connector from the Confluent Hub

As we only see complains from confluent and no support. We should remove and may ping some of the Confluent guys again to highlight if you want PLC4X connector then please do at least the maintenance work and patch security and keep the connector up to date. In my humble opinion. Lukas Am Mi.,

Re: [VOTE] Should we remove the PLC4X Connector from the Confluent Hub

+1 Lukas Am Mi., 12. Apr. 2023 um 08:19 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > +1 > > Chris > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android > > From: Ben Hutcheson > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:50:27 AM > To:

Re: Introduction to PLC4X

Hello Andoni, Welcome to the PLC4X Community:-) Glad to see you on the list. Nice to see someone interested in our framework. Cheers, Lukas Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Andoni Angulo : > Hello everyone, > > My name is Andoni Angulo (LaManoServida on GitHub) and I am another

Re: [DISCUSS] Generally move to using "Context" objects inside our generated code?

+1 yes Otto s comment is correct so it seems to be the next logical step. Otto Fowler schrieb am Sa., 4. Feb. 2023, 15:42: > Any DSL at some point will consider stack / call / variable contexts. > This seems reasonable. > > From: Christofer Dutz > > Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Date:

Re: [DISCUSS] Send dependant emails to commits@ or a new list (notifications@)?

+1 for getting rid of them on our developer list. where we should be able to discuss topics and do releases :-) Am Do., 19. Jan. 2023 um 18:08 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > today I learned, that it’s possible to redirect bot-notifications to > different

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Apache Feather from our logos?

Yeah sure we can remove the feather. We have a lot of other Toddy Logos with PLC s and so on anyway. I am just wondering how we could at least incorporate the colors from the ASF. Cheers Luk Christofer Dutz schrieb am So., 15. Jan. 2023, 12:21: > Hi all, > > I know that initially I had our

Re: [DISCUSS] Having a in-person community meetup?

If I can fit it into my schedule, count me in as well. Lukas Am Mi., 11. Jan. 2023 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > So right now, I count 9 people (one of them planning on using TAC), right? > > > * Ben Hucheson > * Cesar Garcia (TAC) > *

Re: [DISCUSS] Having a in-person community meetup?

cool :-) would be fun so that I can finally ask all my questions in person ;-) Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 16:37 Uhr schrieb Ben Hutcheson < ben.hut...@gmail.com>: > Sounds like fun. > > Ben > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > > Ok … > > > > Uwe from codecentric FFM (the

Re: Simple modbus application does not terminate

+1 -> thank you Niels :-) Am Mo., 2. Jan. 2023 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Niels Basjes : > Thanks for clarifying. > I've added this to the example (+ cleanups): > https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/724 > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 2:43 PM Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > > Hi Niels, > > > > If you find

Re: [DRAFT] December Board Report

+1 seems to be accurate ;-) Luk Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 10:13 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I just wrote our board report … hope I didn’t miss anything. Please > provide feedback, If you have something: > >

Re: Building a PLC4X and IoTDB Historian?

+1 for that . Apache driven Historian would be quite awesome :-) Am Sa., 26. Nov. 2022 um 16:36 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I am currently thinking, if it wouldn’t be a good idea to build something > like an open-source Historian based on PLC4X and

Re: [DISCUSS] Check in generated Java code?

+1 as this simplifies for users Am Fr., 25. Nov. 2022 um 11:27 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I know it’s sort of considered bad practice to check in generated code, > when you’re working with maven. > > However, we’ve already started to check-in

Re: [DISCUSS] Make the PlcConnection return PlcFieldHandler and PlcValueHandler instances?

Nice job Sebastian and Christofer! Awesome work! :-) Am Di., 22. Nov. 2022 um 19:48 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > So, thanks to Sebastian’s great work on the Go SPI, making the ADS driver > use context aware TagHandlers and ValueHandlers, was super easy.

Re: [PLC4PY] Required setup for building?

yes leave it at 3.7. They are currently improving a lot - 3.10 was a major shift and 3.11 has lot of neat improvements concerning error handling. See also: Built-in Exceptions — Python 3.11.0 documentation and Python 3.11 Preview: Even Better

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

e aware of when configuring > the migration? > > Cheers > Dominik > > -----Original Message- > From: Lukas Ott > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:33 AM > To: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues? > > successfully migrated a

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

" Am Mi., 9. Nov. 2022 um 10:25 Uhr schrieb Lukas Ott : > Updated: > - Driver-Profinet -> Profinet > - Driver-ADS -> ADS > - API -> API > - Driver-S7 -> S7 > - Core -> ??? > - Util-Pool -> ??? > - newbie -> good first issue > - Code-Generation

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

fka-Connect >- examples >- Build > - Driver-CANopen >- PLC4J > > The list which I got by jira-to-issues is current labels in our Jira. > Some of them are not on your list, such as "driver". > > Lukas Ott 於 2022年11月1日 週二 凌晨3:25寫道： > > > I s

Re: [DISCUSS] Rename Fields -> Tags?

+1 for "tag" as naming convention Christofer Dutz schrieb am So., 6. Nov. 2022, 13:33: > Hi Lukasz, > > even in protocols like ADS and EIP at Rivian everyone is referring to any > data point as a “Tag”. > So far, I haven’t come across a single person saying something else on > LinkedIn. >

Re: Configuring and using plc4x

Hello Mihai, First of all welcome to the mailing list. :-) I hope that you managed to subscribe. Did you have a look here: https://plc4x.apache.org/users/blogs-videos-and-slides.html ? https://youtu.be/SNFKqrLMIZI this hands on should give you a good starting point on how to get started with

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

gt;- easy-fix >- PLC4C >- documentation-update >- docker >- Integration-Kafka-Connect >- examples >- Build >- Driver-CANopen >- PLC4J > > The list which I got by jira-to-issues is current labels in our Jira. > Some of them are

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

/ Add Issue Template Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Ben Hutcheson < ben.hut...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > This will make the issues more visible, which is probably a good thing. > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 12:06 pm, Lukas Ott wrote: > > > Thank you Dominik! This

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

Plan: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1powrXGbjMLMYl9ibRzMda5o5HM_p44XvBy5MZu75Q5E/edit#heading=h.wskna8eurvjv > > And Beam also open-sourced the migration tool they used: > https://github.com/google/jira-to-issues > > I've not yet tried it, but looks quite good  > > Cheers

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

I will look into that. Currently we have 103 open jira issues. Oldest one is more than 2 years ago. Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 18:28 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > I’m also fine with that. > So anyone willing to work on the migration? > > Chris &

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?

Hi Chris, In my humble opinion we should not run parallel. Our Jira has already a lot of issues that are outdated. So i opt for enabling GitHub Issues and migrating the few Jira Issues that are still worked on. This helps us also for cleaning up and having one public issue tracker, where

Re: Change the array-notation in fields?

The question for me is why not startIndex = 0 Instead of 1. In general this proposal sound reasonable to me and a I opt +1. Luk Am Sa., 29. Okt. 2022 um 17:30 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all > > currently in most drivers we support an array notation like: >

Re: [VOTE] Move the Apache PLC4X Camel adapter to the Apache Camel project

+1 Am Di., 18. Okt. 2022 um 18:52 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > As discussed before: > > I would like to transfer the Apache PLC4X Camel adapter from Apache PLC4X > into the Apache Camel project. > I have discussed this with the Apache Camel folks and they would be

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate/Move the Apache Camel integration to the Apache Camel project?

+1 Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 20:22 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I know we‘ve discussed this on several occasions and as far as I remember > there never really were any objections. But I’d like to do this one > (hopefully) last time. > > So I had a chat

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.10.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Lukas [x] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [x] Verify the signature is correct. [x] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [x] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [x] Unzip the archive. [x] Verify the existence of LICENSE,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 0.10.0 RC1

Yes so we should go for RC2 and have a working 0.10 Version that can be built. Am Fr., 30. Sept. 2022 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Ben Hutcheson < ben.hut...@gmail.com>: > Can confirm there's some SNAPSHOT revisions in the apache-kafka pom. > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:47 AM Otto Fowler > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.10.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Lukas [x] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [x] Verify the signature is correct. [x] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [x] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [x] Unzip the archive. [x] Verify the existence of LICENSE,

Re: [NOTICE] Removal of BitString PlcValue types and update to using PlcBYTE etc.

+1 On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 at 16.31, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > while doing the pre-release grooming of our codebase and testing the > drivers agains the hardware that I have here. I noticed painfully that it > seems every single diver handled the BYTE, WORD, DWORD and LWORD types >

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.6.0 RC1

+1 Lukas System: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS Release: 22.04 Codename: jammy openjdk version "11.0.16" 2022-07-19 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04, mixed mode)

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.6.0 RC1

okay sorry had to "sudo apt install openjdk-11-jdk" ;-) Am Do., 22. Sept. 2022 um 20:33 Uhr schrieb Lukas Ott < ott.lukas...@gmail.com>: > Some more details: > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:3.6.4:descriptor > (default-

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.6.0 RC1

les: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command [ERROR] mvn -rf :plc4x-maven-plugin Am Do., 22. Sept. 2022 um 19:58 Uhr schrieb Lukas Ott < ott.lukas...@gmail.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.6.0 RC1

Can not build from source: [INFO] PLC4X Build Tools: Code Generation: PLC4X Maven Plugin FAILURE [ 6.324 s] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [ERROR]

Re: [API] Added a getArrayDimensions method to the PlcBrowseItems type

+1 and for those who are interested here the article where it has been publicly discussed: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/christofer-dutz_automation-engineering-api-activity-6974392632059781123-d1PN :-) Am So., 11. Sept. 2022 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: >

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report

+1 You do not want to mention our Go based CLI tool or your JavaFX based UI Proof of Concept? Christofer Dutz schrieb am Sa., 10. Sept. 2022, 15:29: > Hi folks > > It’s reporting time again ;-) > > I’m planning on posting the following report on Monday, would be cool to > get some approval

Re: PLC4X Community Call today 19:00 CET

+1 Am Di., 6. Sept. 2022 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to remind you, that it’s the first Tuesday of the month > again and therefore it’s time for another community call. > > You can join, with this link: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Format for specifying "known messages"

I like that approach really much to leverage our existing XML unit tests for this kind of code generation. +1 Am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022 um 13:52 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > It’s getting more and more challenging to keep all of the driver types we > have in

Re: [CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS] Updating the documentation

Hi Chris, We can discuss the details next week in our PLC4X community meeting. I would like to support and update the documentation. So we may do some examples together during the community meeting and I will then continue updating other parts (based on the example we created together) of the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Implement a Java GUI application for browsing PLCs with PLC4X

What about https://cordova.apache.org/ and creating an Electron App? https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/11.x/guide/platforms/electron/index.html So we can deploy easily to all kinds of platforms? Example for a very successful Frontend application: https://github.com/jgraph/drawio Interesting

Re: Zenoh protocol

Hi Sudhakar, Welcome to the list :-) You can just use PLC4X to talk to the current PLCs and then translate to Zenoh protocol. As the concept is quite similar to MQTT. See https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/develop/plc4j/examples/hello-connectivity-mqtt We also support Kafka (

Re: [DISCUSS] Is a page like this ok?

In my humble opinion - yes that is ok - as long as it is aligned with the Apache policies. And in this case it looks fine to me. Am Mi., 15. Juni 2022 um 13:43 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I just recently was in need of a good profiler and

Re: [DRAFT] June Board Report

+1 and we really should aim to have a release soon after all the re-factoring work done by the awesome Sebastian and Chris. Am Do., 2. Juni 2022 um 11:48 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > I updated the Project Activity to this: > > > ## Project Activity: > In the past 3

Re: PLC4J EIP String Reads

Hello Andy, Can you also provide a PCAP from Wireshark and add it to a ticket in Jira? Thank you! BR / otluk Am Do., 5. Mai 2022 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Andy Grebe : > Hello, > > I'm working on a project using EIP and need to read string tags from a > PLC. When I send the read, I see the string

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we ask ComDev to setup PLC4X on redbubble so people could by PLC4X caps, hoodies, etc.?

+1 for Toddy-Hoodie Am Mi., 4. Mai 2022 um 09:35 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > I guess the title says it all. > > Right now, you can only purchase stickers: > https://www.redbubble.com/de/shop/?query=PLC4X=search_box > > Which is cool, but I'd love a Toddy-Hoodie

Re: [DISCUSS] Start release process for 0.10.0?

+1 and 0.11.0 we release in October for ApacheCon :-) Am Fr., 29. Apr. 2022 um 12:43 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Rühl : > Sure, sounds like fun > > - Sebastian > > On 2022/04/29 09:25:28 Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we have again implemented a lot of new features and fixed issues ... but

Re: PLC4Py - Change of Build System - Poetry is for the time beeing not suitable anymore

I mean it is supported by jazzband :-) : https://github.com/jazzband/pip-tools https://pip-tools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Am Mi., 20. Apr. 2022 um 10:41 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Rühl : > pip-tools SGTM > > - Sebastian > > On 2022/04/19 19:52:03 Lukas Ott wrote: > > H

PLC4Py - Change of Build System - Poetry is for the time beeing not suitable anymore

Hello PLC4X Developers, As shown here: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/348 We started the discussion to change our build system. Poetry has at the moment an increasing amount of issues: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues Which are not fixed soon. Even that Poetry is a good

Re: [DISCUSS] Long running branches

+1 I think it is about time to clean up and bringing most of the things to develop branch . Therefore we have the sandbox . Of course if there is something breaking the existing stuff in Java, Go or C we may open a branch. but most of the branches seem to be not in use anymore and it es getting

Re: PLC4X Error

Hi Zap, Welcome to our mailing list :-) Can you give us a little bit more details. What version of PLC4X are you running and is this a Kafka related error or does the error occur from the modbus driver and then which Modbus driver. (Does the error also occur when connecting to the Modbus Device

Re: [DISCUSS] Rename "modbus" to "modbus-tcp"?

tween the > transport and the driver. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, > > Chris > > -Original Message- > From: Lukas Ott > Sent: Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 16:48 > To: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename "modbus" to "modbus-tcp&qu

Re: [DISCUSS] Rename "modbus" to "modbus-tcp"?

+1 I would follow the most common naming convention and call the drivers the following: - Modbus ASCII - Supported Devices: Any Device Supporting Modbus ASII, Any Modbus ASCII Comliant PLC, Flow Computers - Modbus TCP/ IP (What is Modbus TCP/IP ? | Modbus Tcp/ip vs Ethernet ip - The

Re: Update to my role at Apache

I do not think it is necessary as it is just the report and is not related to our decision making process. So i am fine. Christofer Dutz schrieb am Sa., 5. März 2022, 11:42: > Hi all, > > I am not sure everyone on the project heard it, but last Thursday I was > elected as one of the members of

Re: [DRAFT] March PLC4X board report

+1 Am Do., 3. März 2022 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Had to hand write this one ... seems the report generator is currently > defective, but as we reduced the numbers in the report anyway, it wasn't > too much additional work ;-) > > > > I did ad a bit mor

Re: [CODE GENERATION] Updates from today

+1 awesome job Chris and Sebastian ! #teamToddy Am Di., 22. Feb. 2022 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > the last few days I was working hard on creating a new C template module > based on our latest refactorings. There I noticed I need not only a

Re: [DISCUSS] Participate in the Outreachy programm?

gt; > -----Original Message- > From: Lukas Ott > Sent: Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 10:10 > To: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Participate in the Outreachy programm? > > Hi, > > +1 for participating. I still want to drive our native Python support. I >

Re: [DISCUSS] Participate in the Outreachy programm?

Hi, +1 for participating. I still want to drive our native Python support. I would also be willing to mentor in the sense of organization. We had some students from Julians team once and I still think we should at least not stop trying to increase our diversity. Lukas Am Di., 15. Feb. 2022 um

Re: [DISCUSS] Behaviour of a ConnectionPool?

+1 for sequential failing Am Mi., 19. Jan. 2022 um 10:50 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>: > Hi Chris, > > excellent question (and worth discussing). > In the java pool there currently is NO automatic reconnection (lazy > connection). > I have no backup strategy there

Re: [DISCUSS] Permanently move our monthly video call?

+1 Am Mo., 20. Dez. 2021 um 09:08 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I would like to move our monthly call to the first Tuesday of the month > (same time) > > If we leave it, I will not be participating on events that happen to be on > even week numbers. > >

Re: [LAZY-CONSENSUS] Clean up in our branches?

+1 for cleaning up the old branches Am Mi., 15. Dez. 2021 um 10:23 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > I have just tried to revive a not so old branch (feature/plc4net) and that > is a LOT of work. > > Considering how many super-old branches we have; I would

Re: [DRAFT] December PLC4X board report

+1 Am Do., 2. Dez. 2021 um 16:07 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > ## Description: > The mission of the Apache PLC4X project is creating a set of libraries for > communicating with industrial programmable logic controllers (PLCs) using a > variety of protocols but with

Re: [DISCUSS] Bring the Camel connector into the Apache Camel project?

+1 yes lets ask on their mailing list if they are interested. Am Di., 28. Sept. 2021 um 18:32 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > at this year's ApacheCOn@Home I attended a talk on Apache Camel and was > pretty impressed by their component library and Kamelet

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.9.0 RC2

+1 binding Actions performed: Downloaded all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. Verified the signature is correct gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Christofer Dutz (Apache Comitter) < cd...@apache.org>" Verified the SHA512

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Site-Skin 1.1.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Actions performed: Downloaded all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. Verified the signature is correct gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Christofer Dutz (Apache Comitter) < cd...@apache.org>" Verified the SHA512

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.5.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Actions performed: Downloaded all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. Verified the signature is correct gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Christofer Dutz (Apache Comitter) < cd...@apache.org>" Verified the SHA512

Re: Modbus and Plc4x

Hi Jayons, Welcome to the PLC4X community mailing list. :-) you should check-out the re-written Nifi Integration in this Pull Request: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/257 We will merge it soon into development and afterwards start a new PLC4X release. Regards, otluk Am Mi., 8. Sept. 2021

Re: [Reminder] Apache PLC4X community call August 4th 2021

; here comes: > https://us06web.zoom.us/j/91591629512?pwd=Z3A1WTdNbXRmMnZIZ2c3SVdYaHo3QT09 > > And @Lukas Ott<mailto:lo...@csc.com> … you mean Summer 2021 drinks, such > as mulled wine? ;-) > > Chris > > > Von: Cesar Garcia > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. August 2021 2

Re: Account Request PLC4X IoT Lab

Hey Yannick, Welcome to the PLC4X Developer list. Please first of all introduce yourself and what you are aiming for. What are your actual needs, because most of the things do not require access to actual hardware. As we can do most of the things also with our virtual drivers and then just

Re: [DISCUSS] Extend our Jira Issue format to allow selection of "component" and "language"?

+1 Am Mi., 30. Juni 2021 um 11:25 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > as we are more and more polyglot, the question of "What language does > this apply to?" comes up more frequently. So how about adding this as a > mandatory field in issues? > > Chris >

Re: Hi

Hi Purus, Welcome to the club. If you need help just let us know. We will have a Virtual Meeting on 9th of June 2021, starting 7 PM Central European Time. Regards, otluk Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 11:43 Uhr schrieb Purushotham Y : > Hi, >I would like to be part of the development activity

Re: [DRAFT] June Board Report

.+1 yes let s try to keep it short and see if there is feedback fro m the board Christofer Dutz schrieb am Fr., 4. Juni 2021, 10:13: > Hi all, > > this time I tried keeping the details of the report as short as > possible. Even if I liked to point out our achievements and such, I > started

Re: Cleanup in our repo (and Sandbox)?

+1 Am Mi., 12. Mai 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Googlemail OS : > +1 > > > Am 12.05.2021 um 13:20 schrieb Otto Fowler : > > > > +1 > > > >> On May 12, 2021, at 04:19, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I recently had a look at our Sandbox, and I'd like to clean it up a > bit. >

Re: change Lebbing company name at adopters

Hello Marcus, done (updated in the source code -> after rebuild an crtl+f5 also on the website) Best regards Am Mo., 26. Apr. 2021 um 08:22 Uhr schrieb Marcus Gotthardt - Lebbing automation & drives GmbH : > Hello, > > > > please change the company name from > > Lebbing engineering &

Re: PLC4x integration for Profinet

+1 Lukasz you are awesome! Am Mo., 19. Apr. 2021 um 19:33 Uhr schrieb Łukasz Dywicki < l...@code-house.org>: > I've pushed few additional changes to features/profinet2 branch. > > Now it is possible to interact through PLC4X api. At least for > identification calls. > Sample client code: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Refactor our "integration" to use a centralized "Backend" tool?

+1 sounds like a good way forward Am Mi., 24. März 2021 um 16:35 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > inspired by the Sparkplug tool at Building IoT, I started working on a > Sparkplug Edge Gateway to use legacy hardware in a Sparkplug system. > > While at it I

Re: PROFIBUS driver?

Yes, the whole idea of PLC4X is to support as much as possible. The limitation are ressources: - Budget so that the developer gets paid - Time so if you or someone else wants to develop a driver do not hesitate to ask and just do it - Access to devices and / or manuals for the specific protocol

Re: add lebbing to adopters section

Hello Marcus, sure - thank you and welcome to the PLC4X community. As soon as the build server build our website - your company will be added to the list. Best regards Lukas Am Do., 11. März 2021 um 08:56 Uhr schrieb Marcus Gotthardt - Lebbing engineering & consulting GmbH : > Hello, > > > >

Re: AW: Source Time of PLC Value?

+1 to Lukasz Am Mo., 8. März 2021 um 14:09 Uhr schrieb Łukasz Dywicki < l...@code-house.org>: > Hold on for a second. > > Making options pushed over connection string is a long term recipe for > disaster. Apache Camel is a prime example of what could happen if you > starting with configuration

Re: [DISCUSS] Minimum sampling interval on change of state subscription

Hi, concerning limiting the data rate is a really valid point as the newer PLCs are doing exactly that (e.g. they have a Data collector and Data Processor included - and we did exactly that as well with some IIoT sensors that we collected and processed the data directly on the microcontroller) -

Re: DF1 protocol ...cant find documentation

Hi Gaurav, Welcome to the list :-), Yes it really is supported. Here you ll find some more details: https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/code-gen/protocol/df1.html The best way to get started you can find here: https://plc4x.apache.org/users/getting-started/plc4j.html to understand more read

Re: [DISCUSS] Start Implementing turnkey-examples?

+1 for that - as we could use this approach also for other Drivers Am Mi., 17. Feb. 2021 um 08:48 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > you probably noticed, I started a call for help on soncial media to test > the latest auto-discovery for KNX in Go. > Turns

Re: Additional Drivers for GOLang ?

Hello Wolfgang, First of all welcome to the list :-). We indeed want to bring other drivers to GO. Just one mail before we were looking for developers who are willing to do that :-) so feel free to start developing. We are happy to help. So concrete timeline no - roadmap yes - priority yes -

  1   2   >