Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?

2020-04-06 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
Why not DOTNOT? :-) Cheers, Łukasz On 03.04.2020 16:33, Bjoern Hoeper wrote: > Some people are masochistic... ;) > Joking aside I think the more relevant option is F# which could be a good > match for some use cases > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christofer Dutz > Gesendet:

AW: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?

2020-04-03 Thread Bjoern Hoeper
Some people are masochistic... ;) Joking aside I think the more relevant option is F# which could be a good match for some use cases -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 16:30 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET

AW: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?

2020-04-03 Thread Bjoern Hoeper
Hi, in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other language that is compatible with the .NET Runtime. So the language is only the language in which it is written (which could also be intermixed).