Why not DOTNOT? :-) Cheers, Łukasz
On 03.04.2020 16:33, Bjoern Hoeper wrote: > Some people are masochistic... ;) > Joking aside I think the more relevant option is F# which could be a good > match for some use cases > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 16:30 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP? > > But VB?!?!?!?! > > Am 03.04.20, 16:12 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" <hoe...@ltsoft.de>: > > Hi, > > in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context > because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other > language that is compatible with the .NET Runtime. So the language is only > the language in which it is written (which could also be intermixed). > Furthermore it is quite common to use something like NET e.g. log4j had an > equivalent of log4net. > > Björn > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 15:43 > An: dev@plc4x.apache.org > Betreff: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP? > > Hi, > > I just wanted to bring this to discussion … I have now encountered in > several projects that support different languages that the naming convention > we follow seems to match: > > > * C : xyz_c > * C++: xyz_cpp > * Python: xyz_py > > However when it comes to C# we sort of named it “plc4dotnet” … I would > propose to change it to “plc4csharp” as this is the language … “dotnet” is > sort of more the runtime. > > What do you think? > > Chris > > > >
