Some people are masochistic... ;) Joking aside I think the more relevant option is F# which could be a good match for some use cases
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 16:30 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP? But VB?!?!?!?! Am 03.04.20, 16:12 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" <hoe...@ltsoft.de>: Hi, in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other language that is compatible with the .NET Runtime. So the language is only the language in which it is written (which could also be intermixed). Furthermore it is quite common to use something like NET e.g. log4j had an equivalent of log4net. Björn -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 15:43 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP? Hi, I just wanted to bring this to discussion … I have now encountered in several projects that support different languages that the naming convention we follow seems to match: * C : xyz_c * C++: xyz_cpp * Python: xyz_py However when it comes to C# we sort of named it “plc4dotnet” … I would propose to change it to “plc4csharp” as this is the language … “dotnet” is sort of more the runtime. What do you think? Chris