Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

apache.org] > > Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 12:32 PM > > To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1) > > > > In the interest of getting this release out not too far after Aug 2016 > and unfreezing the trunk, are w

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

inal Message- > From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:one...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 12:32 PM > To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1) > > In the interest of getting this release out not too far after Aug 2016

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1) In the interest of getting this release out not too far after Aug 2016 and unfreezing the trunk, are we waiting for the closure of any particular bugs, such as bug 60044 [1], before building RC2? [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60044 On Aug 22, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

In the interest of getting this release out not too far after Aug 2016 and unfreezing the trunk, are we waiting for the closure of any particular bugs, such as bug 60044 [1], before building RC2? [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60044 On Aug 22, 2016 12:33, "Javen O'Neal"

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

While we're discussing enums backwards compatibility, are there any other changes as part of https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836 that we absolutely cannot break backwards compatibility and blocks 3.16? 58190 : PictureType

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Javen O'Neal wrote: switch (cell.getCellType()) { case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in r1757235. See [1] for more info. Thanks! Some of this stuff can be a real pain :( (Personally

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

Nick, could you republish the Javadocs, please? On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Javen O'Neal wrote: >>switch (cell.getCellType()) { >>case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: > > I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

>switch (cell.getCellType()) { >case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC: I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in r1757235. See [1] for more info. My vote is -1. We should rebuild the RC with r1757235. I have added this test [2] to prove that the

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Javen O'Neal wrote: Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC -> CellType.NUMERIC We can't make a backwards incompatible change of this magnitude just like that. It would break almost every single user of POI's code, as well as breaking almost every example of using POI that's out there!

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

Hi, Oh, sorry for the false alarm, this seems to be a problem with my compare-tool (Beyond Compare), it displays two test-documents as being contained on top-level of the src-tar.gz. When extracting via other tools I don't see those. So I am +1 here! However I saw that we do actually break some

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC1)

Vote begins now and ends at 11:55 BST 2016-08-23 Artifacts are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/ Usual checks required (does it work? does the distribution look right?), only more so as this is an RC for a non-beta release. +1 from me. As those of you watching the