Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, David North wrote: Nick - please can you sort the Bugzilla versions? Added 3.15-FINAL and 3.16-dev 3.14-dev and 3.11-FINAL disabled for new bugs Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

r run of RC2 on the full regression corpus >>>> as evidence that we're in good shape. >>>> >>>> Thank you, David! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -Original Message-

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

g on my earlier run of RC2 on the full regression corpus >>> as evidence that we're in good shape. >>> >>> Thank you, David! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -Original Message----- >>> From: David N

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

>> >> Tim >> >> -Original Message- >> From: David North [mailto:dno...@apache.org] >> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:08 PM >> To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3 >> >&g

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

n the full regression corpus > as evidence that we're in good shape. > > Thank you, David! > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -Original Message- > From: David North [mailto:dno...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:08 PM > To: POI Developers List &

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

When I got OOM's with POI because of insufficient heap size, I would get them when I called wb.write(FileOutputStream). IIRC I was using POI 3.8 and 3.9 when doing this memory testing. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I see it

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

+1 Sigs and docs look ok. As this is a final release, please also add a note pointing to #59170 in the release notes. FYI, I've removed the obsolete nexus repos. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

I did my usual tests of comparing release-content and running the newer jars with my local projects, this time all worked fine for me, so I am finally +1 Thanks... Dominik. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:07 PM, David North wrote: > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

Hi, As far as I see it only reduces the amount of memory held while the file was open, closing correctly already freed up the memory in previous versions as well. It also only was visible with read-only access as then we do not use memory-mapping. The user seems to have a very large file at some

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

Is this memory savings seen during regular use of POI, such as the following example, or only when explicitly created with user code calling lower level OPCPackage operations? If so, should release notes mention the lower memory usage for OOXML documents due to File Backed Data Source? Workbook

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

Hi everyone, https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC3/ Areas to review: * Does it work? * Are the sigs and hashes valid? * Have the issues with the last RC been fixed? * Are the release notes (inc requested additions from Javen) OK? The vote starts now and ends at 18:15 BST on