+1 to remove Eclipselink on 1.3 or later !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 7:08 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Doc updates: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2605
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> wrote:
>
> > EL is officially d
e
I also added an iceberg version bump to 1.10 in this track, as our tests
were failing with dependabot update, it will be nice to include this as
well !
https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2586
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:53 AM Alexandre Dutra wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
onable to me !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering to drive the 1.2 release, Prashant!
>
> I believe we previously discussed using the "release train" model, so
> whatever is committed by the branch
volunteer as 1.2 release manager, please
let me know your thoughts !
Best,
Prashant Singh
they get that report, to which i suggested them to
write their own custom metric reporter which rather than hitting the
/report endpoint of Polaris it just dumps data to a DB which their
downstream maintainer services can use.
Looking forward to discussing this more !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri
he/iceberg/blob/main/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/metrics/CommitMetrics.java>
are already available but at this point we don't persist them and hence
they are lost, there has been a request for this in Polaris slack too !
My recommendations would start from here !
Best,
Prashant Sin
cid=C084QSKD6S2
> [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:13 PM Prashant Singh
> wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> > I would also request to consider getting credentials vending PR in,
> mostly
> >
Thank you so much for the context and pointers Dmitri !
Then from my POV I don't think we would require this flag.
Will wait to hear other folks' thoughts on this, then !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 5:19 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
>
Hey All,
I would also request to consider getting credentials vending PR in, mostly
because a lot of users have raised this issue, for long running jobs and
are eagerly waiting for it !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 4:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just
same time not require it to come back to the server to get new creds.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> PR [2341] enables sending endpoints for credential refresh to Iceberg REST
> Catalog clients.
>
> Currently, t
e pre-signed url (https://amzn-s3-demo-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/
object.txt?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE&Signature=
vjbyNxybdZaMmLa%2ByT372YEAiv4%3D&Expires=1741978496) Looking forward to the
design doc / proposal for Polaris. Best, Prashant Singh
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 6:23 AM Robert
Thank you for organizing this Danica !
+1 for the meetup :) and having some guidelines around, iceberg community
is a good example.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:13 AM Alex Merced
wrote:
> I think this meetup would be a great idea, I'll ask around if we have
> a
+1 to 1.0.1 with just helm fix !
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:07 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> A 1.0.1 (patch) release from the 1.0.x branch with just helm fixes SGTM.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > That's a good call.
> >
> > My i
Awesome news !
Thank you Yufei for driving the release :) !
Thanks a ton to the Polaris community for your participation and
contribution; it wouldn't have been possible without you !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 8:59 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Great news! Th
+1 (non-binding)
* Checksums
* Signatures
* tested Postgres
Thank you Yufei,
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 3:32 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Verified Checksums and Sigs
> -Verified all build and test again
> -Rechecked the license fixes we did i
+1 (non binding)
I verified the following:
- Source tarball (shasum and GPG signature)
- Build and test
- Verified server binary distribution
- basic sanity testing with JDBC persistence layer
Thank you Yufei !
Bests,
Prashant
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 9:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (b
rg views and expects
further enhancements via Iceberg Expressions expansion and Iceberg UDF's.*
Best,
Prashant Singh & Russell Spitzer
Apologies for the broken link to the proposal : here you go [OSS] Secure
Views for dynamic policy enforcement.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AJicez7xPhzwKXenGZ19h0hngxrwAg3rSajDV1v0x-s/edit?usp=sharing>
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:06 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
led, I cherry-picked the feature to 1.0, it's a clean cherry-pick !
I believe it will strongly help in Apache Polaris adoption, and
sincerely thank everyone who participated !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:13 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Posting here for
c they can very
well be called context variables instead.
Re: a few common, constant-foldable expressions in FGAC policies, and go
from there.
Precisely, let me share the doc (by next week) which we have been
interating on internally for a while now, I hope all this makes sense once
shared.
Best,
Prashan
this change !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:48 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Rahil
>
> It's interesting, thanks for that. As a first step, the approach
> corresponds to the one used for Delta.
>
> Long term, I would love to see support on other tab
+1 on skipping 0.10 since we are very close to closing all 1.0 blockers.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 3:57 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1 on skipping 0.10 and releasing 1.0 directly given the current status. We
> don't have to spend more time on 0.10.0-beta, and 0.10.0
hat I am working on a proposal doc for incorporating these thoughts
for Polaris, I will share with the community *soon* and would love to get
all of your feedback !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 2:48 PM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> It seems to me that the *easiest* to start with wo
+1, Agree with running this only on main
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 11:22 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> +1, great idea. This process change will reduce noise in the repo as we add
> more releases, and it also aligns more closely with the idea of a release
> as a stable snapshot of the code at some point
The refactor makes sense to me as well, Thanks Yufei !
persistence/
├── eclipselink/
├── relational-jdbc/
├── mongodb/
└── .../
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 1:23 AM Pierre Laporte wrote:
> Could you add a README file at the root of the `persistence/` directory so
> that
> Let's work together on a proper design.
For sure ! will be reaching out soon for this !
Best,
Prashant Singh
world
to unify spark's current_user() to
is_prinicpal() in polaris.
I hope this answers your concern. I am totally open to any recommendation
and work rough edges, let's solve this problem, together as a community !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 9:06 AM Robert Stupp wrote:
is ANALYST i will
never get back view but my IS_MEMBER() is true so i think i should be able
to read the view
this helps expressing this more verbose and get away from grants
This is infact a feature in UNity
[1] https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/views/dynamic
Happy to discuss more !
Best,
P
Thank you so much
for driving this !
Please Let me know your thoughts.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
> It seems to me that what you are trying to do is to store scalar UDF in the
> polaris catalog.
> Iceberg is t
an engine only when
things like identity is involved, we need to do this at catalog level to
have uniform enforcement.
Please let me know your further thoughts.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Prashant
>
> Thanks for the propos
rather than just ACL (which are conjunctions) for ex if we just complicate
the view def with more predicated for ex disjunction
select * from ns1.layer1_table where (condition1) OR
(is_principal_role('ANALYST'))
I would love to get your further feedback, considering the above.
Best,
Prashant
n anything in Polaris all it
matter when the view was asked
what was the caller's identity and hence get the appropriate view
definition.
A trusted engine should just focus on executing the view and not care about
identity resolution.
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:40 AM
sql-reference/functions-context>
Databricks Unity Catalog offers a similar mechanism called *dynamic views*:
https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/views/dynamic
*Next steps*
If the community is interested, we can discuss API surface, engine
implications, and a roadmap for merging.
Eager to hear your feedback!
Best,
Prashant Singh
+1 to the suggestion !
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 7:39 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Great suggestions, Robert! Thanks for writing them down.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:34 AM Robert Stupp wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Looking a bit ahead with respect to releases and (semi
and forgot to reply here :)
> > > >
> > > > Yes agree to deprecate eclipselink it makes sense to me and promote
> > > > "JDBC" instead.
> > > >
> > > > That said, as said in the PR, I think we should keep the eclipselink
> >
295 | 295 |
0 | 47 | 11 | 50 |
88
Unfortunately our mail client does not allow adding zip attachments,
please let me know if you need detailed gatling reports, happy to send
it over the slack !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On
routed to 1 realm still
and then we can diff instance running diff realms ?
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:29 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
> To clarify, Polaris *does* support multi-tenancy. What’s currently limited
> with Option 1 is *account-level* multi-tenancy specifically
olaris.apache.org/in-dev/unreleased/metastores/>.
Cheers,
Prashant Singh
+1
1. Verified checksums, signature, artifacts
2. did manual testing with admin and server, works well !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 7:52 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - checksum and signature are good on the source distributio
Hi all,
I’d like to get your thoughts on deprecating EclipseLink and making JDBC
the default for our persistence layer.
Our current EclipseLink setup mandates execution within a transaction,
which has introduced several issues — notably, an improper implementation
of CAS (compare-and-swap) semant
ators to choose between options
> 1,
> > > 2, 3
> > > > > > > according to their specific deployment concerns.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This means that the primary key has to include the realm ID,
> > > because
&g
a work !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:56 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply and apologies if I missed some relevant
> discussion.
>
> As I understand the catalog could remove snapshots that come in-between
> previous and
options.
Best regards,
Prashant Singh
et me know what your thoughts are ?
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 1:16 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> I'm generally a +1 on using JSONB within Postgres.
>
> However I am in agreement with Dennis that we should avoid his item (2)
> above. If the application will need to
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pSqxf5A59J062j9VFF5rcCpbW9vdTbBKTmjps80D-B0/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.fn6jmpw6phpn
[2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5888
[3] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1285
Best,
Prashant Singh
Congratulations folks, well deserved !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:02 PM yun zou wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yun
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:28 PM Michael Collado
> wrote:
>
> > Wow! Awesome news. Congrats folks!
> >
&
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Prashant
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> +1 LGTM.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We've had some productive discussion in various places on the mailing
> list,
> > in the g
patterns.
Please share your thoughts on this.
Best regards,
Prashant Singh
[1]
https://github.com/apache/polaris/blob/main/polaris-core/src/main/java/org/apache/polaris/core/persistence/AtomicOperationMetaStoreManager.java
[2]
https://github.com/apache/polaris/blob/main/polaris-core/src/main/
Hey folks,
I am presently working on implementing non transactional postgres
implementation using jdbc. in the course of that i noticed in the entity
table that the column type of the properties / internal properties column
is TEXT and not JSONB, I dug a bit into the history of this, seems like we
Thank you so much for the benchmarks !
+1, having benchmark results committed, it will help catch any degradation
/ correctness issue that can creep in !
equivalent to golden files of tpc-ds / tpc-h in spark repo.
Best,
Prashant Sungh
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:53 AM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> I t
50 matches
Mail list logo
