Re: [VOTE] Resolution to create a TLP from graduating Incubator podling

+1 (binding) > On Sep 25, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > Hi all, > > Based on previous discussions ( > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b4ef7c394584988cf0c99920824afaa60ee4c648d5c0069b1bf55c0@%3Cdev.predictionio.apache.org%3E > and >

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to create a TLP from graduating Incubator podling

This looks great Donald, and I'm so glad you accepted the role of Chair. This part of the Special Order will establish the project description text which must appear at the top of every report to the Board: [...] software related to *a machine learning server built on top of state-of-the-art

Re: Graduation to TLP

Donald would be great. Donald - please think about it. It was suggested privately to me that I stay on from mentoring as PMC. If you'll have me, I would be glad to help the new TLP as/if needed. > On Sep 7, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > > This has been an

Re: Graduation to TLP

Some TLPs decide to rotate the Chair role on a yearly basis. Some keep them for as long as the Chair is willing. You should think about what kind of convention for Chair role ownership you'd like to see (if even you have a preference at this point). I have been Chair of two projects at one

Re: August 2017 Podling Report

lgtm Will post shortly to the wiki unless objection. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the following report. Mentors, if this is good to go, please > put this on the incubator wiki. > > Regards, > Donald > > --- > >

Re: New PMC member and committer: Mars Hall

Congratulations and welcome, Mars! > On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Mars Hall wrote: > > Thank you Donald, > > I'm honored & excited to officially join the project! > > *Mars > > ( <> .. <> ) > >> On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:01, Donald Szeto wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: PIO 0.12.0 and Graduation Time?

; voting thread? This would allow us iron out issues in parallel to working > on 0.12. > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Really glad to see this discussion started, because I think your podling >> is near

Re: PIO 0.12.0 and Graduation Time?

Really glad to see this discussion started, because I think your podling is nearing graduation. The most important determination of that is taking the initiative to propose it. I looked over the spreadsheet and have only this comment: You'll gain from having the incubator picking over your binary

Re: New PMC member and committer: Takahiro Hagino

Congratulations and welcome, Takahiro. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache PredictionIO (incubating) > has asked Takahiro Hagino to become a PMC member and committer, and we are > pleased to

Re: New PMC member and committer: Takako Shimamoto

Congratulations and welcome, Takako. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache PredictionIO (incubating) > has asked Takako Shimamoto to become a PMC member and committer, and we are > pleased to

Re: New PMC member and committer: Shinsuke Sugaya

Congratulations, and welcome! On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Shinsuke Sugaya wrote: > Thank you for this exciting opportunity. > I'd like to work on new features/improvements for graduation from > incubator. > > Regards, > shinsuke > > 2017-05-11 13:32 GMT+09:00

Re: Feb 2017 Podling Report

Already posted. SIgned off. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks good, I will post it. > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please revie

Re: Micro-releases

How you manage source control is pretty much up to you. The key is to clearly tag commits that correspond to releases and only advertise those and their binary and/or source artifacts as official project releases. I think that will cover it. > On Dec 14, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Pat Ferrel

Re: Nov 2016 Podling Report

I can't sign the report, your edit is showing as a conflict Suneel. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > Filed the Report. @akpurtell please sign-off on the same. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > +1, will

Re: Nov 2016 Podling Report

+1 On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1, will go ahead and file the report. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Please review the following report. If this is good to go, please feel > free >

Re: clashing hbase queries

This sounds like hotspotting. Ideally the workload over the keyspace can be better distributed, which is another avenue of attack - partitioning, keying strategy. > On Oct 13, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > > The DAG for a template just happens to schedule 2

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

ctionio-1003/ >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> Do we need to vote on the RC2 again? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> >>>>> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

Let me double check. > On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Alex Merritt <emergentor...@apache.org> wrote: > > I believe it depends on which of the two votes you mean. For the podling > vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC votes are, no? > >> On Se

Re: New PMC member and committer: Paul Li

Congratulations and welcome, Paul. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache PredictionIO (incubating) > has asked Paul Li to become a PMC member and committer, and we are pleased > to announce that

Re: Incubation sponsor

Your sponsor is the Apache Incubator. > On Sep 11, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am in the process of putting together a release candidate and figured we > need to add a disclaimer ( > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers).

Re: Binary or Source release

PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 5, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Alex Merritt <emergentor...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Agree we should go source only for this release. > > > > On Sep 5, 2016 1:10 PM, "Suneel

Re: Binary or Source release

or the next > release. > > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It covers LICENSE and NOTICE file generation for both source and binary >> releases, and inclusion of the resulting files in s

Re: Binary or Source release

icense from one dep to another. > > It sounds like your automation covered LICENSE.txt creation? or just > inclusion in the binary? > > > On Sep 5, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I won't weigh in on the question at hand

Re: Binary or Source release

I won't weigh in on the question at hand but I'd like to make a couple of clarifications for what it is worth: > This yielded 166 deps, so this implies we need to include 166 licenses and > copyright notices in LICENSE.txt. There are some available simplifications: - Only need to include one

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

s to fill in - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ktBY0mUxT1GW42Oq2howNmJZea2xj > 8PKVXxAPSIetJE/edit > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Time to report to the Board and IPMC. Do we have a volunteer from t

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

Time to report to the Board and IPMC. Do we have a volunteer from the PPMC to produce the report this time? On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 3:46 AM, wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial

HBaseCon east

I'm pretty sure some PIO folks are going to be in town for Strata, and hopefully will be talking up PIO at the Spark meetup. However there is intersection with another Apache community holding an event at the same time: Google and Bloomberg are co-hosting the Apache HBase community event on

Re: Apache PIO v0.10.0 release

n and is > set to blocking. > > Can anyone help? > > > On Aug 20, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It took Gearpump six release candidates before their first release from > incubation passed the IPMC's checks on corr

Re: templates

> > On Aug 20, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With respect to my estimation of getting that SGA in about a week, I am > optimistic we can turn that around. I will do what I can to drive it. > > There will be no problem

Re: templates

though this has been done many times by other OSS projects. > > > On Aug 20, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another (minor) consideration is the donation will be by way of SGA that > specifies exact git shas. Those will be what

Re: 0.10.0 release

cover all the templates already. He also started > this > > discussion so I think we start with Simon unless someone knows better. Is > > he on vacation? > > > > > > On Aug 16, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > &g

Re: 0.10.0 release

gt; he on vacation? > > > On Aug 16, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > I see that Pat filed INFRA-12441 ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12441) which I read asks to > import code from GitHub repositories under the old

Re: 0.10.0 release

covered by the grant. I'm happy to assist but the PPMC should take the lead. Good luck! On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/ and log in. Find the read 'Create' > button. There's a drop down menu immediately

Re: 0.10.0 release

Go to https://issues.apache.org/jira/ and log in. Find the read 'Create' button. There's a drop down menu immediately to the right of it. Open that menu, then click on 'New Git Repository'. The original request was here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12112 The second request for

Re: 0.10.0 release

Interesting idea to try separate repos for landing to-be-donated templates. On GitHub repositories are cheap and, though not necessarily at this moment at Apache, easy to provision. If you think separate repo and lifecycle is the best way to manage templates then we PPMC plus mentors should

Re: Services are completely down

First, Pat provides a good example of how to walk the line between Apache and commercial concerns in his response. Make a distinction between the two. Clearly delineate responsibilities. Refer all discussion related to the non Apache concern to the appropriate venue. Let me just talk about

Re: Time for the first podling report

t 10:52 AM, Simon Chan <si...@salesforce.com> wrote: > Looks great. Thanks Donald and Andrew! > > Simon > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Looks great, +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2

Re: Time for the first podling report

onio) Xiangrui Meng > [ ](predictionio) Suneel Marthi > > Shepherd/Mentor notes: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Sounds good. Will try to fill in as much as possible before Tuesday > > evening. > > > >

Re: All Github PR closed

t; http://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html this would need to be > modified to use the “develop” branch strategy. It seems less than ideal but > is actually pretty easy in practice and much better than the purely Jira + > patch file method. > > On Jul 4, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Andrew

The PIO JIRA instance is ready

The PIO JIRA instance is ready. Please sign up for an Apache JIRA account at https://issues.apache.org/jira if you do not already have one. Send me your JIRA account info. I will need this information from everyone to add you to the appropriate role. I can also look you up by name on JIRA but