headers exchange does not match correctly on a map entry with a null value
--
Key: QPID-2429
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2429
Project: Qpid
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated QPID-2429:
-
Attachment: QPID-2429.patch
The FieldValue::empty() is incorrect; the attached patch replaces this with a
On 03/03/2010 05:12 PM, _cristian_ wrote:
I have a program that reads messages from local_queue. It works fine. It
gets messages from local_queue and prints them to the screen. This program
starts a subscriptionManager that should be stopped when receives SIGINT or
SIGTERM, but it never
Java broker emits NPE a period following qpid-tool being connected
--
Key: QPID-2430
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2430
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2430:
-
Summary: Java broker emits NPE following qpid-tool being connected (was:
Java broker emits NPE a
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:36 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
Blah blah blah
I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At that point I
will total the votes.
As of today we have 2 votes to release 0.6rc6.
So the release does not have enough votes as is to be released.
I note that
On 03/04/2010 05:16 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:36 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
Blah blah blah
I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At that point I
will total the votes.
As of today we have 2 votes to release 0.6rc6.
So the release does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim reassigned QPID-2429:
Assignee: Gordon Sim
headers exchange does not match correctly on a map entry with a null value
On 03/04/2010 12:31 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/04/2010 05:16 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:36 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
Blah blah blah
I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At that point I
will total the votes.
As of today we have 2 votes to release
I didn't vote as I didn't (and still don't) think it could/should be released
without updating at least the ruby source file licence (as Gordon already did a
couple of days ago). As you note, it's been several weeks, so I don't think
that taking another few days at this point is of concern.
It
.NET csproj files missing Apache license text
-
Key: QPID-2431
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2431
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Dot Net Client
Affects
As of today we have 2 votes to release 0.6rc6.
So the release does not have enough votes as is to be released.
I note that there is concern over the comprehensive inclusion
of license headers in all our files.
Right.
My interpretation of the ASF Source Header and Copyright
Notice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-2429.
--
Resolution: Fixed
headers exchange does not match correctly on a map entry with a null value
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:15 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I didn't vote as I didn't (and still don't) think it could/should be released
without updating at least the ruby source file licence (as Gordon already did
a couple of days ago). As you note, it's been several weeks, so I don't think
+1 for the release.
The files in question are not really source files.
They are just project files for an IDE.
Rajith.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:15 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I didn't vote as I didn't (and still
There is 1 ruby source file that is not licenced in the RC but is on the
branch, Gordon fixed it a couple days ago). I agree that the csproj files
can be classed as not source.
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 March 2010 19:54
To:
It isn't hard to find quotes on the Apache site that firmly lean the
other way on this, eg:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#license
Which Files Must Contain An ASF License Text?
Every source file must contain the appropriate ASF License text.
That's interesting, it seems
17 matches
Mail list logo