[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12874509#action_12874509
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2004:
--
I'm certainly happy to have an alternative solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim reassigned QPID-2004:
Assignee: Andrew Stitcher (was: Gordon Sim)
On shutting down the broker, the connection state of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12874526#action_12874526
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2637:
--
You can workaround this by specifying a timeout to
connection.start() hangs if the connection is not accepted
--
Key: QPID-2637
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2637
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-2637.
--
Resolution: Fixed
connection.start() hangs if the connection is not accepted
Add topic configuration processing to allow Slow Consumer Detection to be
configurable per topic
Key: QPID-2638
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2638
On 2 June 2010 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the same test against the Java
broker to compare the performance?
If you do have time it would be good if you could run it on the 0-91
protocol as well as the 0-10. 0-10 support is new and
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
On 2 June 2010 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the same test against the Java
broker to compare the performance?
If you do have time it would be good if you
On 2 June 2010 15:02, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
On 2 June 2010 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the same test against the Java
broker to compare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chuck Rolke updated QPID-2589:
--
Attachment: qpid_add_x86_platform.patch
This patch coerces the solution to produce DLLs and EXEs that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12874628#action_12874628
]
Alan Conway commented on QPID-2187:
---
In revision 950608 fixed a remaining race condition
Add functionality to exclude any test using the current exclude mechanism
-
Key: QPID-2639
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2639
Project: Qpid
Issue
Jin,
I think it'd be a good idea to share your performance testing framework(so
that qpid can perform a similar test), on the other hand I think that the
frame work is not that complex to share, which just send number of messages
to particular queue/topic and log the stats( at least that what I
13 matches
Mail list logo