Rob Godfrey created QPID-4983:
-
Summary: [Java Broker] Move store implementations to broker plugins
Key: QPID-4983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4983
Project: Qpid
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704342#comment-13704342
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4983:
---
Commit
On 07/09/2013 08:34 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
One of the issues that needs to be fixed for this is the package name
for the code. Currently it's cqpid, which isn't close to what we have
in other languages (which all use a variable on qpid.messaging).
However, we can't use that since it's what
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:01:02PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
I would think that downstream repos would package one or the other
but not both. It would be nice if downstream, it was called
qpid.messagingregardless of the implementation used.
Agreed. I think it ought to be a goal to have the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Weston M. Price updated QPID-4530:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21)
0.23
Provide Documentation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-4976.
--
Resolution: Fixed
[AMQP 1.0] support standard lifetime policies
On 07/10/2013 01:45 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:01:02PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
I would think that downstream repos would package one or the other
but not both. It would be nice if downstream, it was called
qpid.messagingregardless of the implementation used.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:45 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:01:02PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
I would think that downstream repos would package one or the other
but not both. It would be nice if downstream, it was called
On 07/10/2013 04:51 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:45 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:01:02PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
I would think that downstream repos would package one or the other
but not
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:59:43PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 04:51 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:45 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:01:02PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote:
I would think that
Ted Ross created QPID-4984:
--
Summary: Linear File Allocation for the Linux AIO Store
Key: QPID-4984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4984
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704984#comment-13704984
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4984:
---
Commit
On 07/10/2013 06:24 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:59:43PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 04:51 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:45 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13705111#comment-13705111
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4984:
---
Commit
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:23:01PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
Right now the python-qpid fedora package, to use a concrete example,
installs into sitepackages (qpid/messaging.py etc). Are you
proposing to change that?
No, I think I've combined how Ruby and Python work in this case. With
Ruby gems
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12289/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:28 p.m.)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher
On July 8, 2013, 12:10 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/TransactionObserver.h, line 48
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12289/diff/1/?file=318402#file318402line48
It's really the enqueue and dequeue operations that are transactional.
It might be better to
17 matches
Mail list logo
