[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey closed QPID-8579.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> [AMQP-J] main branch uses many insecure l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17514797#comment-17514797
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8579:
--
The qpid-jms-amqp-0-x component is no longer being actively
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17407248#comment-17407248
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8557:
--
Until the data is flushed to disk the fact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17396016#comment-17396016
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8557:
--
how many concurrent producing threads were you using? Unless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17394621#comment-17394621
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8557:
--
{quote}Although QPID-8547 introduced configurable parameters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17268498#comment-17268498
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8499 at 1/20/21, 10:39 AM:
-
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17268501#comment-17268501
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8496:
--
Glad to hear that Robbie's supreme diagnosis skills led you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17268498#comment-17268498
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8499:
--
My understanding of this trust store type was that its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17264185#comment-17264185
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8496:
--
Hi [~hlizza88],
I would suggest that you turn on AMQP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17185116#comment-17185116
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8452:
--
{quote}The AMQP protocol specification states that the Data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159926#comment-17159926
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8455:
--
[~DedeepyaT] Thanks for your patch, but as per the discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159176#comment-17159176
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8455:
--
[~orudyy] Personally I think it's acceptable to simply do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159065#comment-17159065
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8454:
--
[~orudyy] I've not thought *hugely* about this... but my gut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159045#comment-17159045
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8455:
--
[~orudyy] I worry the "alternative names"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17158022#comment-17158022
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8454:
--
Are you thinking of a single endpoint per broker, or one per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17158016#comment-17158016
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8455:
--
I agree with these needing to be fixed, but I think we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17057986#comment-17057986
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8427:
--
This sounds a lot like QPID-8393 which was fixed in v7.1.7 I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051019#comment-17051019
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8346:
--
I'm still not sure I agree with this
bq. The message should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050445#comment-17050445
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8346:
--
I think I disagree with the premise of this Jira - the fact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046475#comment-17046475
]
Robert Godfrey commented on PROTON-2108:
To start with something I think we can all agree on
bq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046377#comment-17046377
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on PROTON-2108 at 2/27/20 9:20 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046377#comment-17046377
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on PROTON-2108 at 2/27/20 9:18 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046377#comment-17046377
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on PROTON-2108 at 2/27/20 9:17 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046377#comment-17046377
]
Robert Godfrey commented on PROTON-2108:
[~jross]what it says is what the authors intended
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey reassigned QPID-8105:
Assignee: Robert Godfrey
> broker-core unit tests are failing because of wrong loc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8105:
-
Description:
The tests make assumptions that they are running in a Locale where the comma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17024244#comment-17024244
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8405 at 1/27/20 11:07 AM:
{quote}I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17024244#comment-17024244
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8405 at 1/27/20 11:05 AM:
{quote}I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17024244#comment-17024244
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8405:
--
bq. I see. So much for standards and their specifications
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17023014#comment-17023014
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8405 at 1/24/20 3:17 PM:
---
For AMQP 0-9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17023014#comment-17023014
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8405:
--
For AMQP 0-9-1 the "expiration&q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8404:
-
Attachment: 0001-QPID-8404-Fix-usage-of-Jetty-for-TLS-client-certs.patch
> [Broker-J] Use of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey reassigned QPID-8404:
Assignee: Robert Godfrey
> [Broker-J] Use of TLS client certificates in versions > =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8404:
-
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> [Broker-J] Use of TLS client certificates in versi
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8404:
Summary: [Broker-J] Use of TLS client certificates in versions > =
7.1.5 broken by Jetty changes
Key: QPID-8404
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17014413#comment-17014413
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8401:
--
{quote}Now regarding the current behavior of the broker, note
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17012996#comment-17012996
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8401:
--
In general I don't think the broker can ignore store issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey reassigned QPID-8395:
Assignee: Robert Godfrey
> [Broker-J] Refactor selector/filter handling when add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8395:
-
Description:
Much of the code around adding filters (selectors) to consumers is driven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8395:
-
Environment: (was: Much of the code around adding filters (selectors)
to consumers is driven
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8395:
Summary: [Broker-J] Refactor selector/filter handling when adding
consumers to queues
Key: QPID-8395
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8395
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17004283#comment-17004283
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8389:
--
Thanks [~orudyy] getting back to address your comments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003007#comment-17003007
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8385:
--
[~orudyy] I updated [^QPID-8385_QPID-8393.patch] to prevent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8385:
-
Attachment: (was: QPID-8385_QPID-8393.patch)
> [Broker-J] Improve performance of dequeu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8385:
-
Attachment: QPID-8385_QPID-8393.patch
> [Broker-J] Improve performance of dequeuing old qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17002991#comment-17002991
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8385 at 12/24/19 8:46 PM:
[~orudyy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17002991#comment-17002991
]
Robert Godfrey edited comment on QPID-8385 at 12/24/19 8:45 PM:
[~orudyy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8385:
-
Attachment: QPID-8385_QPID-8393.patch
> [Broker-J] Improve performance of dequeuing old qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17002991#comment-17002991
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8385:
--
[~orudyy] So one approach here is simply to implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8392:
-
Description: In Qpid 7.0 the way that DLQs were configured was changed, and
the implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8392:
-
Summary: [Broker-J] Remove references to x-qpid-dlq-enabled from docs
(was: [Broker-J] Remove
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8392:
Summary: [Broker-J] Remove references to x-qpid-dlq-enabled from
code and docs
Key: QPID-8392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8392
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16999779#comment-16999779
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8389:
--
So "operational" vs. "live"... I can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16991383#comment-16991383
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8389:
--
Currently this does not fully support modifying the setting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey reassigned QPID-8389:
Assignee: Robert Godfrey
> [Broker-J] Support the ability to limit the number of act
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey reassigned QPID-8388:
Assignee: Robert Godfrey
> [Broker-J] Allow for configuration to ignore unknown Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8388:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> [Broker-J] Allow for configuration to ignore unknown Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16988865#comment-16988865
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8388:
--
I've made a change to enable the configuration of behaviour
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8389:
Summary: [Broker-J] Support the ability to limit the number of
active consumers
Key: QPID-8389
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8389
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8378:
-
Description: A defect was found in changes for method
{{AbstractQueue#visit()QueueEntryVisitor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8378:
-
Summary: [Broker-J] Message references can be leaked in some rare
circumstances (was: [Broker-J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16980521#comment-16980521
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8376:
--
I've tested now on Oracle JDK 8 on OS X, Open JDK 11 (Hotspot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8382:
-
Status: Reviewable (was: In Progress)
> [Broker-J] Allow for attribute injectors to be t
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8382:
Summary: [Broker-J] Allow for attribute injectors to be type
specific
Key: QPID-8382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8382
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16978350#comment-16978350
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8376:
--
All good with me - apologies for not testing with the IBM JDK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8380:
-
Status: Reviewable (was: In Progress)
> [Broker-J] getMessageInfo on a queue does not incl
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8380:
Summary: [Broker-J] getMessageInfo on a queue does not include
groupId
Key: QPID-8380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8380
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16977238#comment-16977238
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8377:
--
Thanks Alex - must have been unlucky in the choices of test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16976181#comment-16976181
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8377:
--
[~orudyy] is there an easy way to write a protocol test where
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8377:
-
Status: Reviewable (was: In Progress)
> [Broker-J] Allow for configuration to ignore unkn
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8377:
Summary: [Broker-J] Allow for configuration to ignore unknown
Exchange.Declare arguments
Key: QPID-8377
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8377
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8376:
-
Fix Version/s: qpid-java-broker-8.0.0
> [Broker-J] Add Process CPU time to collected Bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Godfrey updated QPID-8376:
-
Status: Reviewable (was: In Progress)
> [Broker-J] Add Process CPU time to collected Bro
Robert Godfrey created QPID-8376:
Summary: [Broker-J] Add Process CPU time to collected Broker
statistics
Key: QPID-8376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8376
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950138#comment-16950138
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8331:
--
While it makes complete sense to upgrade Derby... my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16947288#comment-16947288
]
Robert Godfrey commented on QPID-8369:
--
bq. Obviously, the rule will limit only AMQP connections
Hi Justin,
request to merge QPID-4673 [1][2] to 0.22. This is a fix to a deadlock
which occurs in the Java Broker when running in the AMQP 1.0 codepath.
There is no impact to non 1.0 users.
Cheers,
Rob
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4673
[2]
The XSL is all my own work, so I can stick an Apache license on it :-)
-- Rob
On 27 April 2012 11:11, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4913/
Review request for qpid, Rafael Schloming and Rob
Hi Ken,
On 15 November 2011 19:43, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on adding support for server-side message selectors to the C++
Broker.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-530 (better late than
never...)
Excellent... not having to implement
All,
as Qpid users and/or developers you may be interested in attending the 4th
Annual AMQP Conference, and official AMQP 1.0 launch event which will be
held in New York on October 12th.
More details on the conference (including a link to the registration site)
can be found here:
I'm planning on checking in all the Java code I've been working on for AMQP
1-0 on a branch soon... possibly over the weekend... it's very rough, and I
would like to remodel it in terms of the way we've discussed... however the
broker changes allow the Qpid Java Broker to do a passable impression
On 7 July 2011 18:43, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-07-07 16:28:47, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
This seems a bit horrible, deliberately leaving a session open and
unused. Were there really no alternative options?
On first glance I also don't imagine this works with the Java
On 4 July 2011 12:44, Keith Wall keith.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Robbie and I are presently working on QPID-2811 and QPID-2815. These Jiras
will rationalise the transport mechanism in Qpid and to allow client/broker
to be tested together within the same JVM regardless of transport.
It seems to
On 28 June 2011 17:13, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/28/2011 04:10 PM, mick wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:51 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
E.g. imagine the group relates to some real world object being
modelled
and each message contains describes an update
To me that situation
So, in general this looks good, and is something we could support in the
Java Broker... My one comment would be that I think the more standard
behaviour for a Group is to ensure all messages in the same group are
delivered (in order) to the same consumer, with the notion of blocking
delivery of
On 27 June 2011 17:41, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/27/2011 05:25 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
So, in general this looks good, and is something we could support in the
Java Broker... My one comment would be that I think the more standard
behaviour for a Group is to ensure all
Sounds like a good plan to me!
Cheers,
Rob
On 11 May 2011 13:35, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Rajith
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to get a mailing list set up to direct to from the CI tasks
that
Presumably that's due to this code in ServerConfiguration.java:
try
{
Signal sig = new sun.misc.Signal(HUP);
sun.misc.Signal.handle(sig, this);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
_logger.error(Signal HUP not supported for OS: +
On 26 April 2011 15:47, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I get the following warning message on the client side for each client
call
i make.
[2011-04-25 13:25:10,177] WARN
On 1 April 2011 10:30, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/31/2011 08:08 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
Also, I forgot to add, should we not move the code into an attic or
something. If we're not going to support the codebase, lets be very clear
about it?
Yes, we should also modify
On 1 April 2011 15:44, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 15:02 +0200, Robert Godfrey wrote:
So my suggestion would probably be to have attic as a sibling to the
current
trunk
i.e. as
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/attic
to move the current
On 1 April 2011 16:11, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:10 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
By deleting, it becomes more of a pain for people to
inspect the old code (which they may actually be using a version of even
if
we don't support it) or create patches against it etc
On 1 April 2011 18:19, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
You have to ask yourself, How much time and effort am I willing to put
into a component that's dead? If it's something significant, leave it
in an attic-type thing. If not, delete it.
I'm not sure that's really the question...
On 31 March 2011 19:36, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
I know Gordon said:
Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the
following artefacts - and volunteers to verify
On 31 March 2011 21:06, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2011 19:36, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote:
I know Gordon said:
Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has
On 30 March 2011 00:22, Andrew Kennedy andrewinternatio...@gmail.comwrote:
On 29 March 2011 18:57, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 19:31, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
I have a one last question on the patch. I have registered SSL protocol
handler
Correct - I agree with Robbie that this has missed the cut for 0.10
-- Rob
On 30 March 2011 17:56, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote:
Just to confirm: this problem is not a regression?
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I think the time for making such changes is long past where
Hi Rajika,
there's actually two issues which need fixing to get SSL support in the
broker (by coincidence I happened to be looking at this over the weekend) -
and by the looks of the problem you are reporting you've only fixed one of
them...
try the attached patch for the trunk broker and see if
this ?
Rajika
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
hi Rob,
Your second change is the exact change that I did to get the SSL to work.
I'll attach your patch and let you know.
Thanks!
Rajika
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf
On 25 March 2011 09:25, Andrew Kennedy andrewinternatio...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24 Mar 2011, at 16:45, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On 03/24/2011 11:55 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 16:07 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote:
...
Branch is probably the wrong name here... but I'm
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
