Le 27/05/2010 01:55, Rajith Attapattu a écrit :
532Kbuild/lib/qpid-client-0.7.jar
32K build/lib/mina-filter-ssl-1.0.1.jar
4.0Kbuild/lib/plugins
1.4Mbuild/lib/qpid-common-0.7.jar
24K build/lib/qpid-all.jar
308Kbuild/lib/mina-core-1.0.1.jar
28K
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 27/05/2010 01:55, Rajith Attapattu a écrit :
532K build/lib/qpid-client-0.7.jar
32K build/lib/mina-filter-ssl-1.0.1.jar
4.0K build/lib/plugins
1.4M build/lib/qpid-common-0.7.jar
24K
Le 27/05/2010 02:35, Martin Ritchie a écrit :
Don't for get to count your favourite slf4j binding to make the total
size of a usable client.
SLF4J 1.6 has been released earlier this month. The bindings are now
optional and you can run with just the base jar (24K only).
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/05/2010 02:32, Martin Ritchie a écrit :
I've been swamped and hadn't had the chance, I'll make a effort this
weekend as I'd like to see us using a somewhat more recent MIna. We
can easily get rid of backport-util by putting the dummy Java.15
version in. It simply proxies the Java
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 27/05/2010 02:35, Martin Ritchie a écrit :
Don't for get to count your favourite slf4j binding to make the total
size of a usable client.
SLF4J 1.6 has been released earlier this month. The bindings are now
On 27 May 2010 17:42, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 27/05/2010 02:32, Martin Ritchie a écrit :
I've been swamped and hadn't had the chance, I'll make a effort this
weekend as I'd like to see us using a somewhat more recent MIna. We
can easily get rid of backport-util by putting
On 27 May 2010 17:16, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 27/05/2010 01:55, Rajith Attapattu a écrit :
532Kbuild/lib/qpid-client-0.7.jar
32K build/lib/mina-filter-ssl-1.0.1.jar
4.0K
I'm not sure this would work actually, looking that the project page it says
the 1.5 dummy isn't compatible with 1.6+ JVM's
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Martin Ritchie [mailto:ritch...@apache.org]
Sent: 27 May 2010 01:33
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Size of the Java
...@apache.org]
Sent: 27 May 2010 01:33
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Size of the Java client
snip
We can easily get rid of backport-util by putting the dummy Java.15
version in. It simply proxies the Java concurrent classes rather than
using the 1.4 compatible approach.
/snip
If we upgrade to mina 1.1.7 then we could easily get rid of
backport-util-concurrent.jar.
With the changes I proposed in QPID-2629 we reduce this a bit further as well.
For the client release, if we don't ship the tests then with the above
changes we could get somewhere close to ~ 2.3 MB.
Here's
Hi,
+1 for the idea of getting rid of backport-util-concurrent jar
As a curiosity, did anybody run any kind of test with Emmanuel's patch for
upgrading to Mina 1.1.7 - is this change bringing any noticeable
improvement?
Thanks,
Sorin
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Rajith Attapattu
On 27 May 2010 01:16, Sorin S. ssu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 for the idea of getting rid of backport-util-concurrent jar
As a curiosity, did anybody run any kind of test with Emmanuel's patch for
upgrading to Mina 1.1.7 - is this change bringing any noticeable
improvement?
I've been swamped
On 27 May 2010 00:55, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
If we upgrade to mina 1.1.7 then we could easily get rid of
backport-util-concurrent.jar.
With the changes I proposed in QPID-2629 we reduce this a bit further as well.
For the client release, if we don't ship the tests then
would expect a message queue client to be not bigger than ~500KB
(dependencies included and fully compressed with pack200+lzma)
500KB would be nice. Some of my science experiments target Java-based
platforms with 1MB of Flash and 1MB of RAM. For now I open sockets to a
server, and the
Rafael Schloming a écrit :
I'm generally in favor of examining and reducing our dependencies where
possible. We haven't done this in a long time, so I wouldn't be
surprised if they could be trimmed a bit. Do you have a specific
size/configuration in mind? Are you looking at embedded usage or
15 matches
Mail list logo
