I'm really only passing through qpid-dev, so feel free to ignore me,
but IME Friday deadlines turn into Monday deadlines turn into
Wednesday the week after deadlines all too easily.
- Aidan
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Justin,
Wondering if you
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Kennedy
andrewinternatio...@gmail.com wrote:
i am going to be implementing QPID-2476, version 2 access control
lists for the Java broker. these are my current thoughts and i would
appreciate any ideas or caveats, but please bear in mind that i am new
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
We could temporarily exclude until the issue is fixed.
If you are going to check in a fix soon, I'd say don't bother.
I'm not entirely clear on what the issue with this is at this stage.
Is the problem that the java
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Marnie McCormack
marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's corect - they will have done. I've been reviewing them when time
permits, but happy for other devs to review too to aid progress. Hoping
we'll have more time for review in the 0.8 cycle.
This is
I've recently been wrestling with transaction handling in the java
broker in the context of 0-9-1 compliance. We're currently not
strictly spec compliant with 0-9-1 as we will resend messages that
have been rolled back. 0-9 and 0-8 are... ambiguous... on this matter,
and I've been trying to retain
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Robert Godfrey
rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree we should use initCause *in addition to* setLinkedException
This. We should probably switch everything that uses one or the other
to use both.
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
* Simple majority required.
* No veto votes
* At least 3 + votes.
I propose that we consider all commiter votes not just binding PMC
votes.
* The vote will last a week closing 1800 GMT, Wednesday March 17 2010 *
+lots I'll fix the java and 0-8 and 0-10 C# clients next week. I don't have
Visual Studio (or even a Windows install) so can't help with the WCF client
On 16 Mar 2010 19:32, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
I was trying to figure out where the project version is stored and it
appears to be
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Robie
jonathan.ro...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's a PDF built from the Qpid Wiki, converted to DocBook:
http://people.apache.org/~jonathan/qpid-book.pdf
This is all kinds of awesome.
I'd also like to get some other people working on this with me. I'd
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Marnie McCormack
marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can those willing/able to act as mentors this year please also reply on this
thread ? Every project outline needs at least one mentor, preferably 1 +
backup.
I'll happily mentor again this year, it's been
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that there are two different means configuring the
heartbeat interval for the JMS client.
The 0-9 codepath uses a jvm argument while the 0-10 codepath uses a
broker URL property.
From a users perspective
On 24 Dec 2009 16:14, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipu,
As Robbie mentioned the Java Broker now supports 0-10.
So I recommend downloading the current RC2 from here
(http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc2/) and trying it out again.
Regards,
Rajith
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 4:54
What that meant to say was: we shouldn't reccomend users download things
that aren't official releases (ie. Have not been voted on).
On 24 Dec 2009 16:14, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipu,
As Robbie mentioned the Java Broker now supports 0-10.
So I recommend downloading the
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 12:13 -0500, Steve Huston wrote:
RC1 is ok on Windows, both 32 and 64 bit.
I haven't looked at RC2; my understanding is that only cluster and java
changed, yes?
Correct, so Windows should not
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
Another point is that a number of other projects do distinguish between
dev and release versions using precisely this model - it's not a proof
that it's any good for us, but an indication that it's useful for them.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 19:35 +, Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com
wrote:
1. The trunk is now frozen for all checkins except blockers. Obviously
you'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2239:
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
[.Net 0-10] Close() method is hanging indefinetely
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
Okay, I've thought about it now - please checkin the patch attached
QPID-2240 into the trunk. Leave 2239/2240 open - I'll resolve them when
I respin.
Thanks for taking that patch. I've committed it in r893315
-
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I'm +1 for dev builds being 0.2x+1.svn rev number, and released
builds being 0.2x.meaningful micro version
Sounds like a plan to me.
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
1. The trunk is now frozen for all checkins except blockers. Obviously
you'll need to include the Jira reference to the blocker in your checkin
comment
2. So any other changes will be reverted as soon as I find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2273.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Works with 0.5 as well. Win.
Java client can't negotiate to 0-9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791902#action_12791902
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1830:
-
I don't think dumping the data in toString
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-500.
Resolution: Fixed
This is as done as it's gonna get. Nobody should use the 0-8 impl for new work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791749#action_12791749
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-2273:
-
That patch breaks RabbitMQ 0-9-1 tests, I think
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
QPID-2273 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273), QPID-1830
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1830) - Aidan can you give
some status on these bugs? Are they going to be finished in the next
couple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2273:
Attachment: (was:
0001-QPID-2273-set-the-protocol-version-on-the-connectio.patch)
Java client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2273:
Attachment: 0001-QPID-2273-make-protocol-negotiation-saner.patch
This patch fixes the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2273:
Attachment: (was:
0001-QPID-2273-make-protocol-negotiation-saner.-This-cau.patch)
Java client
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
First sign of madness this, but never mind eh?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com
wrote:
QPID-2273 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273), QPID-1830
(http
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
I came up against that a couple months ago. The reason seemed to be that the
ConversationFactory is calling toString() on a message before its sent, and
the toString() behaviour was changed from previously
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner reassigned QPID-1830:
---
Assignee: Rajith Attapattu (was: Aidan Skinner)
This was caused by r756228, could you fix
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, John Obaterspok
john.obaters...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on a Fedora 12 machine and I'm having problems building the dotnet
client. Running 'ant' in the gentool directory from a fresh checkout
(r:890479 gives me the below error:
What version of java do you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1830:
Affects Version/s: 0.7
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7)
0.6
Moving back
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Robbie Gemmell rob...@apache.org wrote:
combinations of client-broker and those all worked, it seems to just
the trunk client against 0.5 broker I can't seem to get running.
Has anyone used this combo successfully, is it just clumsy me doing
somthing wrong?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
What ever we do new JNDI, prefixing (which I find a tad strange) we
need to support both formats simultaneously in a single file to allow
users to migrate.
Mixing formats in one file seems unlikely. Wouldn't users
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Robbie Gemmell rob...@apache.org wrote:
combinations of client-broker and those all worked, it seems to just
the trunk client against 0.5 broker I can't seem to get running.
Has
Reporter: Aidan Skinner
Assignee: Aidan Skinner
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 0.6
For instance, if you try connecting a trunk client to a 0.5 broker it fails.
This is due to the delegate using the wrong ProtocolVersion.
--
This message is automatically
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Robert Godfrey
rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
Any clues as to what is going on?
AMQConnection._protocolVersion isn't being set properly when it comes
back with 0-9, so although the correct delegate is created it asks for
0-9-1. I've got a simple fix but it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2273:
Attachment: 0001-QPID-2273-set-the-protocol-version-on-the-connectio.patch
simple patch
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Robert Godfrey
rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
Any clues as to what is going on?
AMQConnection._protocolVersion isn't being set properly when it comes
back with 0-9, so although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2273:
Attachment: 0001-QPID-2273-make-protocol-negotiation-saner.-This-cau.patch
2nd patch, this does
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Rafael Schloming rafa...@redhat.com wrote:
[ ] Adopt the above statements as our official committership criteria.
+1
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love http://qpid.apache.org
A witty saying proves nothing - Voltaire
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
However I'd like to see similar functionality/behaviour implemented by
our brokers for a given requirement where possible.
The Java brokers ip-whitelisting feature is standalone atm.
So wondering if there is any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2238.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Commited, thanks for the patch!
[.Net 0-10] Recursive call to ToString method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2237.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
comitted, thanks for the patch!
UUID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2238:
Fix Version/s: 0.6
[.Net 0-10] Recursive call to ToString method causes a stack overflow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787228#action_12787228
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-2240:
-
I think this patch is OK in principle, a couple
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Marnie McCormack
marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just wondered if there's any reason for removing the setLinkedException (did
Rob mention this?)?
Only my poor eyesight. It's back now. :)
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote:
If there are a lot of devs/ users that want it that and put the effort in
to build such a thing and maintain it, for
example create a c++ shim for JMS for RDMA/IB. And a strong community forms
then why not?
I.e.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1987:
Affects Version/s: 0.6
0.5
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Patch for 0.10 C# API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-500:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.6
M2.1
M3
M4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2224:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Repeated random failures for MINANetworkDriverTest
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:11 PM, James Mansion
ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
Aidan Skinner wrote:
It's particularly important where we're importing something which
duplicates (fully or partially) existing functionality, if only so
that the situation is sufficiently clear to people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1972.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I've applied Julien's patch from QPID-1987
UUID.randomUUID() is not thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1987.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patches applied.
Patch for 0.10 C# API
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry for being picky, but I'd prefer if you use docs instead of
documentation as the folder name :)
trunk/qpid/documentation/src -- trunk/qpid/docs/src
Could it be doc/ ? That's traditional ;)
- Aidan
--
Apache
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/2 Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com:
Well, discounting myself (I have a half-baked^Wimplemented system to
manage my music using AMQP and Banshee), it's shipped in downstream
distros (eg. SLES10
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/2 Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com:
But not enough demand for it to translate into any emails to our dev
lists asking for assistance (as far as I can recall).
Memories are fallible things. Search works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784576#action_12784576
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-1987:
-
UberFAIL that we haven't gotten this in. Patch
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Rafael Schloming rafa...@redhat.com:
I think the point for this thread is that if it is windows-only then it
isn't really a substitute for the existing dotnet clients which work (in as
much as they have
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
The MINANetworkDriverTest has repeated random test failures for last
month and half or so.
Is there any objection if I add it to the exclude list until somebody
has the time to have a look at the test and make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2192.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Client and common print stack to stdout
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:47 PM, rob...@apache.org wrote:
QPID-2184: correct use of reload instead of restart in
testDenyOnRestartInVhost(), add a delay to the SIGHUP based reload to help
ensure the new config is in place before testing continues, helping prevent
sporadic failure
Urgh,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2184.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in r835115
updated ip whitelisting / firewall config doesnt take effect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12775383#action_12775383
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-2193:
-
That seems quite dangerous to me. If we can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12776178#action_12776178
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-2184:
-
This works for per-virtualhost firewall sections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-2184:
Attachment: 0002-QPID-2184-add-a-test-case-for-the-firewall-config-u.patch
0001-QPID
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/8 Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org
The original message is delivered and persisted as normal. The
exchange would hold onto a copy of that message, and generate an
entirely new, identical one at the specified
The original message is delivered and persisted as normal. The
exchange would hold onto a copy of that message, and generate an
entirely new, identical one at the specified interval.
Putting this logic at the exchange level seems better to me because
it avoids further complicating the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner reassigned QPID-2184:
---
Assignee: Aidan Skinner
updated ip whitelisting / firewall config doesnt take effect after
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:35 PM, ritch...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ritchiem
Date: Wed Oct 28 13:35:14 2009
New Revision: 830534
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=830534view=rev
Log:
Created 0.5.x Development branch
Added:
qpid/branches/0.5.x-dev/
que?
Are you planning on
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
The above test fails occasionally.
It could be due to the port is already in use? perhaps caused by a
previous test not cleaning up properly?
Sorry I haven't had time to dig deeper, but hope the following will help.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Robert Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
For info, I've also just updated the Java Client/Broker to speak
AMQP0-9-1... So they should now speak all publically available versions of
the AMQP protocol.
Ooooh, nice! Beat me to it. :)
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1764:
Status: Open (was: Ready To Review)
Create Abstract base class to perform new reference counting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner closed QPID-1764.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
This has been backed out and is not really relevant anymore
Create Abstract
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2006.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Yep
enable opening queues and exchanges directly from other mbean views
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner closed QPID-2023.
---
Resolution: Fixed
We should just skip this step really and instead remove our dependence on the
MINA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1996.
-
Resolution: Fixed
OK
Notifications view clears the table and forces deselection at every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770754#action_12770754
]
Aidan Skinner commented on QPID-2154:
-
I can't see any way for the connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner reassigned QPID-2154:
---
Assignee: Martin Ritchie (was: Aidan Skinner)
Hrm, Jira doesn't have a NEEDINFO status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner closed QPID-1863.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Expiry does not work on exclusive queues
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Rafael Schloming rafa...@redhat.com wrote:
This sounds very encouraging. It would be good to have the Java Broker
speaking 0-10 for the upcoming release. Do you think it would be reasonable
to land the branch in time? I imagine it would be preferable to get it
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:23 PM, rgodf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rgodfrey
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:23:01 2009
New Revision: 827724
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=827724view=rev
Log:
Implemented persistence, changed transactions, implemented message
conversion, fixed for all Java
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike Owens mikeow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone using the git repo? I have tried both methods on the source page
and I get the following errors:
$ git clone git://jukka.zitting.name/qpid.git qpid
Initialized empty Git repository in
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike Owens mikeow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone using the git repo? I have tried both methods on the source page
and I get the following errors:
$ git clone git://jukka.zitting.name
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, ritch...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ritchiem
Date: Mon Oct 19 11:10:33 2009
New Revision: 826638
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=826638view=rev
Log:
QPID-1816 : When client fails over due to an error, that error is still held
bt the StateManager
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
2009/10/19 Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, ritch...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ritchiem
Date: Mon Oct 19 11:10:33 2009
New Revision: 826638
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner reassigned QPID-2154:
---
Assignee: Aidan Skinner
New Network IO Layer has doesn't appear to clean up connections
Trunk still uses Mina, it's just not as tightly coupled. I haven't
ported the 0-10 side of things to these interfaces yet. Once I've done
that it'll be possible to choose alternate implementations.
- Aidan
On 10/15/09, Martin Ritchie ritch...@apache.org wrote:
2009/10/15 Aidan Skinner ai
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Marnie McCormack
marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Aidan,
Have you got a list if JIRAs you're planning for 0.6 ?
Jira's normally a pretty good indication of what I'm working on,
here's a search for things assigned to me, with a fix-for for 0.6:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2010.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Implement NetworkDriver and ProtocolEngine to decouple MINA dependency from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2025.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Implement AMQProtocolEngine
---
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1921.
-
Resolution: Fixed
System test persistent storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1962.
-
Resolution: Fixed
FirewallPluginTest.testSingleHostWilcardRule is dependent on 127.0.0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1626.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Pluggable authorization modules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2026.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Add NetworkConfiguration type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2105.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Client should use NetworkDriver/ProtocolEngine interfaces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-2111.
-
Resolution: Fixed
SelectorTest is split into two and doesn't test runtime selector exceptions
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we have a clearly defined scope for the release? Are all the things
in scope for the release in Jira? I think it would be good be able to
give Dave some more scientific analysis on the likelihood of hitting
the
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, ritch...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ritchiem
Date: Thu Oct 8 08:17:33 2009
New Revision: 823087
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=823087view=rev
Log:
QPID-1950 : Problem is that the thrown exception whilst an IOException does
not signify that the
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
