Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/73
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jianqiao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/73#discussion_r73290304
--- Diff: query_optimizer/rules/BottomUpRule.hpp ---
@@ -80,6 +81,14 @@ class BottomUpRule : public Rule {
*/
virtual TreeNodePtr
Github user pateljm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
This looks good Caleb (@cwelton)! Can you rebase so that I can merge this
commit? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user pateljm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/74
@jianqiao @hbdeshmukh Did any of you want the query_id for use in the
future?
@zuyu: Can you expand on the reason to drop the query_id further?
Thanks!
---
If your
Github user jianqiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/76
Thanks Harshad!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zuyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/79
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/73
@jianqiao Per workflow, please delete the branch after merged. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cwelton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
Rebase complete
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
@pateljm We need to reverse this merge, due to an incorrect rebase.
@cwelton We expect a different rebase result where this PR only contains a
single commit ahead of the
Github user cwelton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
Ah, sorry, just thought you wanted the extraneous merge commit squashed.
I've reordered the commits in my branch. For some reason the hashjoin commit
is still showing up in this PR,
Github user cwelton commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
Thanks for fixing, I suggest adding a contributor's guide with your
suggested git workflow, to help streamline future contributors/contributions.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
@cwelton No worry for this PR. I've addressed the issues in the `master`
branch. Thanks again for submitting a PR.
Next time if we run `git fetch origin/master` and then `git rebase
Github user pateljm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
Thanks @cwelton! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hbdeshmukh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/76#discussion_r73384912
--- Diff: query_execution/QueryExecutionTypedefs.hpp ---
@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ enum QueryExecutionMessageType : message_type_id {
#endif
Github user jianqiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/74
This change looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/74
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user zuyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/77
Added TMB Client Id in QueryHandle.
W/ the concurrent query support, `QueryHandle` needs to capture the TMB
client id of the `CLI` which submits the query, so `Foreman` could later reply
Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
Yes, we should add a workflow for contributors as well. Stay tuned!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/75
@cwelton I've created [the
guideline](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/QUICKSTEP/Workflow+For+Contributors)
as suggested. Cheers!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Thanks Julian for the reminder! Just added the report for Quickstep.
Cheers,
Jignesh
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Today is the deadline for the report. If you miss the deadline, this will
> be the second consecutive month that you have failed to
Thanks Julian! Nope hadn't seen those emails -- I bet its in my (now
deleted) Pivotal mailbox.
@Julian: Nice feedback on using the Apache terms. Makes sense. New proposal
attached.
@Roman: We do have a new README.md file in the main repo to get started.
@Julian and @Roman: Feedback well taken
Did you see my reply[1] and Roman’s reply[2] to your message?
I think it’s great that you are thinking about governance, review process, and
a path for people to become members of the project. But before you invent
concepts like “core contributor”, are you familiar with the Apache concepts
Good point on adding changes to our git workflow.
@Zuyu - I see you are on the wiki in edit mode, so will let you make the
changes. Thanks in advance!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:58 PM, ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
wrote:
>
> [
>
GitHub user zuyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/78
Processed InitiateRebuild message for the distributed version.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
See below, comments on specific points.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:35 PM, J Patel wrote:
>
> All: Would love to hear your thoughts on a release. I'd like to propose mid
> to late November, which likely works out best given the semester cadence
> (yeah -- I know we are far
Github user hbdeshmukh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/76
Looks good to me. Thanks for this feature, it should be quite useful!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/76
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user zuyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/79
Constructed Generators once in the optimizer.
Instead of creating generators each time per query, do so once, and reuse
the instances for every query.
You can merge this pull request into
Dear Julian,
Your feedback is very welcome and valuable as usual. Comments inlined
below, but overall I thought I was proposing that seems to be in line with
the Apache governance model. If there are specific issues, would love if
you can point it out in general and I can go work on it.
> In
29 matches
Mail list logo