I think I have a repair for the bug, but I'm still checking.
At Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:17:39 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 30 minutes ago, Casey Klein wrote:
> > No, the build failure is due to this bug:
> >
> > http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12116
> >
> > I'd be happy to avoid build
30 minutes ago, Casey Klein wrote:
> No, the build failure is due to this bug:
>
> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12116
>
> I'd be happy to avoid building redex/tests/compiler temporarily, but
> I don't know how to do that, short of removing it from the
> repository entirely.
You
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> No, the build failure is due to this bug:
>
> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12116
>
> I'd be happy to avoid building redex/tests/compiler temporarily, but I
> don't know how to do that, short of removing it from the repository
No, the build failure is due to this bug:
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12116
I'd be happy to avoid building redex/tests/compiler temporarily, but I
don't know how to do that, short of removing it from the repository
entirely.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Stephen Chang wrot
I'm getting some compile errors. Is it due to this checkin?
raco setup: post-installing: mzcom
raco setup: post-installing: mzscheme
raco setup: post-installing: racket/gui
raco setup:
raco setup: error: during making for redex/tests/compiler
raco setup: compile: identifier used out of context i
I find Mathematica's Help/Demo/Tutorial pages to be exemplary documentation
for new and experienced users. (I'm thinking of what you get from pressing
F1 in the desktop app rather than the online Demonstrations website, which
is itself vast and cool.) Most topics have many demos where each is
act
On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind of
>> problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we created
>> continuation marks.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind of
> problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we created
> continuation marks. We need annotations time and again and they couple parts
> of ou
6 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind
> of problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we
> created continuation marks. We need annotations time and again and
> they couple parts of our system more closely
Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind of problems
we faced when we created mixins and then again when we created continuation
marks. We need annotations time and again and they couple parts of our system
more closely than necessary. Problem is, we don't seem to se
Four minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > A possible conclusion would be that it's useful to know these kind
> > of things about an expanded piece of syntax, and therefore more
> > macros should do that -- but that's unrelated from the stepp
On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Three minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>>> Earlier today, Stephen Chang wrote:
It seems like most people agree that it's ok to add stepper syntax
properties to lazy rack
Three minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > Earlier today, Stephen Chang wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems like most people agree that it's ok to add stepper syntax
> >> properties to lazy racket.
> >
> > I agree with that in general while developm
On Aug 16, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Earlier today, Stephen Chang wrote:
>>
>> It seems like most people agree that it's ok to add stepper syntax
>> properties to lazy racket.
>
> I agree with that in general while development is ongoing, but
> eventually it should be disconnected
15 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Go look at all the examples at the CodeMirror site.
> All allow you to edit. Some evaluate.
Which ones?
(The only thing I see is the HTML editor, but that evaluation is done
locally by your browser, so that "evaluation" is basically just
injecting
On Aug 16, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 7 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> Eli Barzilay wrote at 08/16/2011 02:20 PM:
>>> Isn't this just a JS-based editor?
>>
>> CodeMirror a rather nice JS-based text editor for programming
>> languages, as JS-based text editors for programming l
Earlier today, Stephen Chang wrote:
>
> It seems like most people agree that it's ok to add stepper syntax
> properties to lazy racket.
I agree with that in general while development is ongoing, but
eventually it should be disconnected too.
> The problem is that the lazy language is split betwe
Eli Barzilay wrote at 08/16/2011 02:52 PM:
7 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Well, if you wanted to support FS operations and FFI, and you have a
spare server with the virtualization helper CPU instructions,
This sounds way too expensive for something public.
If you wanted to
Wouldn't it be even better to put curly-braces around the body of the C macro,
so people using it don't have to know that it expands into multiple statements?
Stephen Bloch
sbl...@adelphi.edu
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists
7 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Eli Barzilay wrote at 08/16/2011 02:20 PM:
> > Isn't this just a JS-based editor?
>
> CodeMirror a rather nice JS-based text editor for programming
> languages, as JS-based text editors for programming languages go,
> and includes a Scheme language mode.
I di
Eli Barzilay wrote at 08/16/2011 02:20 PM:
Isn't this just a JS-based editor?
CodeMirror a rather nice JS-based text editor for programming languages,
as JS-based text editors for programming languages go, and includes a
Scheme language mode.
Danny Yoo has used CodeMirror in the implemen
Here's the simplest example I could come up with:
In `dummy.rkt':
#lang s-exp "dummy-lang.rkt"
In `dummy-lang.rkt':
#lang racket/base
(provide (rename-out (module-begin #%module-begin)))
(require (for-syntax racket/base))
(define-syntax (module-begin stx)
#'(#%module-
6 hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Here is a site that comes with demos/shots that are simple and yet
> interactive and thus impressive. I am wondering whether we could
> turn our little code snippets into stuff that people can run and
> possibly even modify and run. We may have to 'cheat'
It's difficult to say more than that `free-identifier=?' could return
the wrong result if the internal representation of one identifier's
lexical context is just right. The representation difference has to do
with whether syntax-object operations internally lead to a list or a
vector of consecutive
Oh sorry, I meant how did the bug manifest itself in racket programs.
On 08/16/2011 11:02 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The C macro expanded into more than a single expression, but there was
> no {} after the else, so the latter expressions always ran.
>
> This is a great example :)
>
> Jay
>
> On Tue
The C macro expanded into more than a single expression, but there was
no {} after the else, so the latter expressions always ran.
This is a great example :)
Jay
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> What was the bug? :)
>
> On 08/16/2011 10:43 AM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
What was the bug? :)
On 08/16/2011 10:43 AM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> mflatt has updated `master' from d05f138ed2 to 311d55b5cf.
> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/d05f138ed2..311d55b5cf
>
> =[ 1 Commits ]==
>
> Directory summary:
> 1
At Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:25:10 +0200, Marijn wrote:
> > I noticed that text-fields are now missing their right border. Might be
> > related to your fix.
> >
> > Marijn
>
> There seems to be some positioning error, as text-fields are now
> displayed on top of their labels.
Thanks for the report! I'
Here is a site that comes with demos/shots that are simple and yet interactive
and thus impressive. I am wondering whether we could turn our little code
snippets into stuff that people can run and possibly even modify and run. We
may have to 'cheat' and use WhaleSong in the background to power
> I noticed that text-fields are now missing their right border. Might be
> related to your fix.
>
> Marijn
There seems to be some positioning error, as text-fields are now
displayed on top of their labels. Sample program:
#lang racket/gui
(define root (new frame% (label "Test")))
(new text-f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/11 10:43, Marijn wrote:
> On 08/13/11 15:01, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:20:23 +0200, Marijn wrote:
>>> On 06/21/11 09:50, Marijn wrote:
On 06/20/11 18:29, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think I've found the problem and p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/11 15:01, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:20:23 +0200, Marijn wrote:
>> On 06/21/11 09:50, Marijn wrote:
>>> On 06/20/11 18:29, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I think I've found the problem and pushed a fix.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the qu
32 matches
Mail list logo
