On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:37 PM, YC wrote:
>
> By default content are encrypted either via quote-printable or base64,
> with the content-transfer-encoding set accordingly.
>
I meant encoded instead of encrypted.
Cheers,
yc
_
For list-related adm
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> 2. There is still an issue with non-ascii content in the body.
> Digging around, it seems to me that the easiest way to make it work
> is to always add a "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit" header.
>
> Does anyone know if this is a corr
I've revised `net/sendmail', with one noticeable change where it now
encodes the sender/subject/recipient strings if they contain non-ascii
characters. (This is fine for existing uses that already do that
before calling sendmail, since the quoted string will not have such
characters.)
But this ra
At Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:28:54 -0500,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I'm not opposed to having *some* "Why Racket?" text, just to the
> particular text:
I agree with most of your points about the specifics of the text.
> | Based on over 15 years of research and practical experience,
>
> *yawn*
On the one
50 minutes ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:45:26 -0500,
> Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > (c) I'd get rid of the "why racket" section -- I don't see anything
> > there that doesn't induce yawnage,
>
> I disagree. This paragraph advertizes our high-quality libraries and
> IDE. Both of
At Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:45:26 -0500,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
> (c) I'd get rid of the "why racket" section -- I don't see anything
> there that doesn't induce yawnage,
I disagree. This paragraph advertizes our high-quality libraries and
IDE. Both of these are great selling points, and our current websi
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 12/20/2011 08:02 AM:
I wouldn't mind a second Racket site that has some of what Asumu proposes, say
Racket-fans.org
BTW, I recently registered "racket-club.{org,com}", mainly for the humor
potential. If there is a site that someone has been aching to see
happe
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> > Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM:
>> >
>> >> and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers.
>> >
>> > Asumu,
Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> > Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM:
> >
> >> and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers.
> >
> > Asumu, it seems like you're on a good track, but after you get the
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM:
>
>> and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers.
>
> Asumu, it seems like you're on a good track, but after you get the layout
> how you like it in your browser, I don't
Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM:
and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers.
Asumu, it seems like you're on a good track, but after you get the
layout how you like it in your browser, I don't envy you the
cross-browser testing to which Eli refers. :)
At Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:11:35 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2011-12-20 08:02:15 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> > I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
> > My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
>
> Taking some feedback into account, here's a second
30 minutes ago, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2011-12-20 08:02:15 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> > I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
> > My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
>
> Taking some feedback into account, here's a second mockup:
> http://ww
On 2011-12-20 08:02:15 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
> My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
Taking some feedback into account, here's a second mockup:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/asumu/racket-home-3/
It leaves
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
>> My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
>
> The important questions about this are:
>
5 hours ago, Norman Gray wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> On 2011 Dec 20, at 05:34, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>
> > Currently, the Racket home page is really nice, but it leaves a
> > significant amount of vertical space unused that could be used to
> > communicate information.
>
> ...or which could be us
It's disgusting, like all newspapers.
On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> How do you feel about the website of the FAZ, in that case? ;)
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>
How do you feel about the website of the FAZ, in that case? ;)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthias Felleisen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do NOT like pages that have text belo
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
>> My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
>
> The important questions about this are:
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I do NOT like pages that have text below my laptop screen 'fold'.
> My eyes do glaze over. And I am off the page quickly.
The important questions about this are:
1. Does it affect your attention to the "above-the-fold" text?
2. Are y
On 12/20/11 8:02 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
On 2011-12-20 4:07 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
I like the idea, but I think our twitter feed and blog aren't updated enough.
When we decided to put a twitter feed on the rabbitmq.com homepage, we
went with simply including *any tweet mentioning rabbi
On 2011-12-20 4:07 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I like the idea, but I think our twitter feed and blog aren't updated enough.
When we decided to put a twitter feed on the rabbitmq.com homepage, we
went with simply including *any tweet mentioning rabbitmq*. This has its
upside and its downside, of co
Asumu, thanks for the effort.
I like the width of the Ruby and Clojure pages -- space on each side is good.
I really like the highlighting of the sample code on the Ruby page.
I prefer our organization of sample code, and I wish we could run some of these
in Danny's compiler.
I like the heig
I like the idea too, but I think we should bring more content from
other parts of the site to the front page. The Ruby home page
[http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/] has most of our "participate" section
on the front page, for example. The Clojure home page
[http://clojure.org/] does a nice job with t
Greetings.
On 2011 Dec 20, at 05:34, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Currently, the Racket home page is really nice, but it leaves a
> significant amount of vertical space unused that could be used to
> communicate information.
...or which could be used, as now, to project authority and decisiveness.
I like the idea, but I think our twitter feed and blog aren't updated enough.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, the Racket home page is really nice, but it leaves a
> significant amount of vertical space unused that could be used to
> communic
26 matches
Mail list logo
