On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> At Fri, 13 May 2011 17:38:41 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>> The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of
>>> duplication. In particular, the following
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Fri, 13 May 2011 17:38:41 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of
>> duplication. In particular, the following functions seem identical:
>> `stx-null?' `stx-list?' `stx->
At Fri, 13 May 2011 17:38:41 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of
> duplication. In particular, the following functions seem identical:
> `stx-null?' `stx-list?' `stx->list' `stx-pair?' `stx-car' `stx-cdr'.
>
> Is there any rea
The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of
duplication. In particular, the following functions seem identical:
`stx-null?' `stx-list?' `stx->list' `stx-pair?' `stx-car' `stx-cdr'.
Is there any reason not to just have `syntax/stx' reprovide them,
instead of defining dup
4 matches
Mail list logo