Just a side question:
Would it be a bad idea to make a separate library that uses the normal
names without f, so that people can write
#lang racket
(require racket/flist)
?
or even use `prefix-in' if they prefer?
Laurent
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
I like this idea a lot. If you start from racket/base, you can then 'graduate'
to a saner Racket gradually. -- Matthias
On Mar 10, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Laurent wrote:
Just a side question:
Would it be a bad idea to make a separate library that uses the normal names
without f, so that
9 hours ago, Laurent wrote:
Just a side question:
Would it be a bad idea to make a separate library that uses the
normal names without f, so that people can write
#lang racket
(require racket/flist)
?
or even use `prefix-in' if they prefer?
Something that comes up from time to time is
A few minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Here's why I think it might be useless:
For just `takef-right', it's possible to do something smart that
scans the list in order, keeping a pointer to the beginning of
the current good block. This avoids a double scan *but* the
It's no committed pushed. With the bad argument order.
Just to show how bad it is, it's not just `findf' -- there's many
others, like `partition' which is very similar, yet it takes the
predicate first.
I'd really like to fix the order of all of these things. Maybe
someone has some idea how
#lang racket2 ?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
It's no committed pushed. With the bad argument order.
Just to show how bad it is, it's not just `findf' -- there's many
others, like `partition' which is very similar, yet it takes the
predicate first.
An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote:
#lang racket2 ?
That is much later than I hoped.
(And when it comes, I certainly hope it won't be `racket2'.)
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
It's no committed pushed. With the bad argument order.
Just
7 matches
Mail list logo
