Re: [racket-dev] F1 on latest release

2010-10-20 Thread Hari Prashanth
I have seen this before... If I remember correctly, it happened after using "raco fileinject" and "raco remove" several times... I just removed .racket directory and it went away... I could not reproduce the problem, so I did not report it... Hari - Original Message - From: "Matthias F

[racket-dev] F1 on latest release

2010-10-20 Thread Matthias Felleisen
F1 doesn't work on a recent git: browser-run: process execute failed: '(# "-e" "open location \"file:///Users/matthias/Library/Racket/5.0.1.8/doc/search/search-context.html?q=read-html&hq=O%3A%7B%20L%3Alang%2Fhtdp-beginner-abbr%20T%3Ateachpack%20%7D&label=Beginning%20Student%20with%20List%20Ab

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Neil Toronto
Noel Welsh wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Doug Williams wrote: I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was a build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric answe

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Vincent St-Amour
At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:36:58 -0600, Doug Williams wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what you're saying Matthew. > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > Overall, keep in mind that changes to vector contracts mean that > > vectors can be wrapped with chaperones. That's why `u

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread John Clements
On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > John, was that to get them to work with a nightly (or pre-release) build or > with the released version of Racket? I've not had any problems running them > on the released version. But, I haven't exercised them to the extent that you > have.

[racket-dev] macros for sub-keywords

2010-10-20 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
We've brought this up on this list before -- forms like provide export their sub-keywords as macros. I believe this is why the following module compiles: #lang racket (require scribble/base) (define (defn t) (bold t)) (provide all-defined-out) Someone just spent 30 minutes wrestling with this.

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Noel Welsh
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Doug Williams wrote: > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was > a build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science > collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric answers > for some o

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Doug Williams
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying Matthew. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:48:20 -0700, John Clements wrote: > > > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > > > > > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Doug Williams
John, was that to get them to work with a nightly (or pre-release) build or with the released version of Racket? I've not had any problems running them on the released version. But, I haven't exercised them to the extent that you have. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, John Clements wrote: > > On

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Doug Williams
None of these are typed. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Are they typed? > > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > > > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it > was a build from 10/16). The plot package and plot exten

Re: [racket-dev] BSL, test: bad syntax

2010-10-20 Thread Robby Findler
I'm seeing this too and hope to look into it at some point in the not too distant future. Robby On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:56 AM, David Van Horn wrote: > On 10/20/10 10:53 AM, David Van Horn wrote: >> >> Are others aware of this? >> >> Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.0.2.1--2010-08-25(-/f) [3m]. >

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Vincent St-Amour
I'll see if I can reproduce the problem with the typed version. At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:48:20 -0700, John Clements wrote: > Also, very late flash of insight: my response (getting rid of > unsafe-vector-ref and unsafe-vector-set!) might explain my performance > issues with the FFT library. I doubt

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:48:20 -0700, John Clements wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > > > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was > a build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science > collection all work as ex

Re: [racket-dev] BSL, test: bad syntax

2010-10-20 Thread David Van Horn
On 10/20/10 10:53 AM, David Van Horn wrote: Are others aware of this? Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.0.2.1--2010-08-25(-/f) [3m]. Language: Beginning Student; memory limit: 512 MB. > 5 5 test: bad syntax Er, I just rebuilt from git, so something is wrong on my end given the 2010-08-25 date;

[racket-dev] BSL, test: bad syntax

2010-10-20 Thread David Van Horn
Are others aware of this? Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.0.2.1--2010-08-25(-/f) [3m]. Language: Beginning Student; memory limit: 512 MB. > 5 5 test: bad syntax David _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread John Clements
On Oct 20, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was a > build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science > collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric answers > for some o

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Are they typed? On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was a > build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science > collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric a

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.0.2 has begun

2010-10-20 Thread Doug Williams
I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was a build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric answers for some of my science collection routines (for example, the gamma functi

Re: [racket-dev] --enable-macprefix gone?

2010-10-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:03:33 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > About a minute ago, David Van Horn wrote: > > On 10/19/10 10:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > 9 hours ago, David Van Horn wrote: > > >> Has the --enable-macprefix option been removed from the configure > > >> script? When I configure, I get

Re: [racket-dev] internal definitions & stepper

2010-10-20 Thread Michael Sperber
Robby Findler writes: > Number 2 probably changed a while back when signatures were > introduced, I'd guess. That one is not so easy to roll back. I specifically fixed this at some point - it may also be related to the "namespace changes". I'll try to look at it later today, but can't make any