[racket-dev] Can a TR wizard check my extflonum changes? [was [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated]

2014-04-22 Thread Neil Toronto
On 04/22/2014 10:48 AM, ntoro...@racket-lang.org wrote: ntoronto has updated `master' from 67805b9f04 to 14bbd662e9. http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/67805b9f04..14bbd662e9 ~~ 85deab7 Neil Toronto 2014-04-22 10:45 : | Added ExtFlonum (and subtypes) and ExtFlVector to the base type env

[racket-dev] pi, was: Re: [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated

2014-04-22 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:48 PM, ntoro...@racket-lang.org wrote: > racket/collects/racket/extflonum.rkt > > --- OLD/racket/collects/racket/extflonum.rkt > +++ NEW/racket/collects/racket/extflonum.rkt > @@ -6,10 +6,12 @@ > (for-syntax racket/base)) > > (

Re: [racket-dev] Can a TR wizard check my extflonum changes? [was [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated]

2014-04-22 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: > > The changes mostly mimic the types and test cases for flonums and flvectors, > but with adjustments to leave extflonums out of the numeric tower. > Everything passes and extflonum expressions seem to type correctly, but I > can't be sure I d

Re: [racket-dev] Can a TR wizard check my extflonum changes? [was [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated]

2014-04-22 Thread Neil Toronto
On 04/22/2014 11:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: The changes mostly mimic the types and test cases for flonums and flvectors, but with adjustments to leave extflonums out of the numeric tower. Everything passes and extflonum expressions se

Re: [racket-dev] Can a TR wizard check my extflonum changes? [was [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated]

2014-04-22 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: > On 04/22/2014 11:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Neil Toronto >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The changes mostly mimic the types and test cases for flonums and >>> flvectors, >>> but with adjustments to leave ex

Re: [racket-dev] pi, was: Re: [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated

2014-04-22 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 04/22/2014 01:37 PM: I think we should dedicate this commit to Kate Bush's PI song (or vice versa?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZSHr5E7fZY Are Kate Bush dedications a slippery slope? Software developers will tend to work towards the metrics. Soon the can

Re: [racket-dev] pi, was: Re: [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated

2014-04-22 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Kate Bush's song contains more digits of PI than your commit. What does Bagger 288 do for Racket commits? :-) On Apr 22, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Matthias Felleisen wrote at 04/22/2014 01:37 PM: >> I think we should dedicate this commit to Kate Bush's PI song (or vice >> ver

Re: [racket-dev] pi, was: Re: [plt] Push #28592: master branch updated

2014-04-22 Thread Stephen Bloch
Songwriter Lucy Kaplansky (daughter of mathematician Irving Kaplansky, IIRC) isn't as famous as Kate Bush, but also wrote a "pi" song, with C=1, D=2, E=3, etc. Stephen Bloch sbl...@adelphi.edu > On Apr 22, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > >> On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:48 PM, ntoro

[racket-dev] we are suspect!

2014-04-22 Thread Robby Findler
>From my mac os x machine's console log. 4/22/14 1:04:44.000 PM kernel[0]: process DrRacket[32404] thread 8646879 caught burning CPU! It used more than 50% CPU (Actual recent usage: 73%) over 180 seconds. thread lifetime cpu usage 346.323259 seconds, (330.726984 user, 15.596275 system) ledger info

Re: [racket-dev] we are suspect!

2014-04-22 Thread J. Ian Johnson
And on Earth Day, no less! For shame. -Ian - Original Message - From: "Robby Findler" To: dev@racket-lang.org Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:21:03 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [racket-dev] we are suspect! >From my mac os x machine's console log. 4/22/14 1:04:44.000 PM kernel