Eli Barzilay writes:
> 11 hours ago, Michael Sperber wrote:
>>
>> I still need Stephen Chang's commit to be merged over:
>>
>> commit 8956364387fa25ffeb51e50fc1a83c20fd88af32
>> Author: Stephen Chang
>> Date: Sun Jul 24 12:18:09 2011 -0400
>>
>> change recon-val in stepper to use rende
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>> 10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
They have more similarities than your message suggests I believe.
And it is pr
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> 10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>>> They have more similarities than your message suggests I believe.
>>> And it is probably worth exploring that. As far as I can see a
>>> facet
An hour and a half ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> Have you tried the nightly builds?
>
> http://pre.racket-lang.org/installers/
Just a quick note: when there's a release going on, it's a perfect
opportunity to recommend using that build rather than going for the
nightly that has moved on since th
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual
>> framework.
>
> Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
> the VM would need to be
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
>> On 2011-07-27 4:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>> If you have a sufficiently powerful inspector, you can traverse any
>>> structure. In principle, you can even traverse
On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual
> framework.
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
> No, `struct->vector' uses the chape
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 2011-07-27 4:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> If you have a sufficiently powerful inspector, you can traverse any
>> structure. In principle, you can even traverse closures this way, but
>> no inspector with the needed power exis
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done, in case my [late] response on the prior thread was missed.
--Carl
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> They have more similarities than your message suggests I believe.
>> And it is probably worth exploring that. As far as I can see a
>> facet/modulet has less stuff than a package and possibly a differe
On 2011-07-27 4:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> If you have a sufficiently powerful inspector, you can traverse any
> structure. In principle, you can even traverse closures this way, but
> no inspector with the needed power exists. See `struct->vector'.
That sounds fantastic! Especially the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 2011-07-26 1:20 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> I don't have a lot of expertise on the ORM side, but I think Snooze
>> would probably be awesome and my MongoDB-backed structs may be helpful
>> too.
>
> Is there a way of generically traver
8 minutes ago, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You may be interested to learn that Racket,
> http://spoofed.org/files/racket/doc/, is a Ruby Raw Packet Library
> for working with various network layers,
Yes, the ohloh project page for "racket" was for that thing.
> that has been incorpo
On 2011-07-26 1:20 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I don't have a lot of expertise on the ORM side, but I think Snooze
> would probably be awesome and my MongoDB-backed structs may be helpful
> too.
Is there a way of generically traversing all structure in a completely
privileged way in Racket, without
Hi all,
You may be interested to learn that Racket,
http://spoofed.org/files/racket/doc/, is a Ruby Raw Packet Library for
working with various network layers, that has been incorporated into
Metasploit http://www.metasploit.com/, a penetration testing toolkit.
I know I was!
Cheers,
Tony
_
11 hours ago, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> I still need Stephen Chang's commit to be merged over:
>
> commit 8956364387fa25ffeb51e50fc1a83c20fd88af32
> Author: Stephen Chang
> Date: Sun Jul 24 12:18:09 2011 -0400
>
> change recon-val in stepper to use render-to-sexpr for non-lazy lists
The
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> * Carl Eastlund
> - Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Sunday, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>
> > * Stephen Bloch
> > - Picturing Programs Tests
>
> Looks good. I've just pushed three commits:
> ab01d563ca6a0313e1cb5c07372a2bd2929ae4bc should definitely go into the
> release (it corrects some err
50 minutes ago, Will M. Farr wrote:
> I believe that the resulting native code libraries make racket run
> faster, but haven't run any detailed tests (there was quite a gap
> between my last gcc-based build and my first clang-based one, so the
> improvements may also be due to Racket development).
Hello Racket Developers,
I thought I would write a quick note about building Racket on Mac OS X 10.6.8
with the new clang compiler (the new front-end to the LLVM compiler backend
that is becoming the standard compiler on Mac OS X for XCode 4 and later).
Overall, it's been a good experience. A
10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> They have more similarities than your message suggests I believe.
> And it is probably worth exploring that. As far as I can see a
> facet/modulet has less stuff than a package and possibly a different
> story vis a vis files in the filesystem.
They're reall
They have more similarities than your message suggests I believe. And it is
probably worth exploring that. As far as I can see a facet/modulet has less
stuff than a package and possibly a different story vis a vis files in the
filesystem.
Robby
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
I don't see them as overlapping, but you may understand them different
than I do.
The way I see modules/facets is that 'racket/list.rkt' will have a
'default' facet and a 'testing' facet and a 'documentation' facet, so
that each use can be syntactically close but separately loadable.
The way I se
On Jul 27, 2011, at 1:29 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Checklist items for the v5.1.2 release
> (using the v5.1.1.900 release candidate build)
>
> Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
> item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
> comm
Bullet point 2 seems like it may overlap (in a practical, "what do I
use today" sort of a way) with Matthew's modulelet construct. Both
group modules together, both provide independently loadable things.
Do we really want/need both of these?
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Jay McCarthy w
Ryan Culpepper writes:
> * Mike Sperber
> - Stepper Tests
I still need Stephen Chang's commit to be merged over:
commit 8956364387fa25ffeb51e50fc1a83c20fd88af32
Author: Stephen Chang
Date: Sun Jul 24 12:18:09 2011 -0400
change recon-val in stepper to use render-to-sexpr for non-lazy
26 matches
Mail list logo
