>From the Ars Technica article, second paragraph:
"Swift seems to get rid of Objective C's reliance on defined pointers;
instead, the compiler infers the variable type, just as many scripting
languages do."
Is it just me, or is almost everything about this sentence technically
wrong, except the p
Hi Jay,
Have not been following Racket development too closely lately, but
perhaps you might find this helpful?
http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=while-loop.plt&owner=dyoo
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I came across some oddity under DrRacket involving continuations. If
I have the following in my definitions window:
;
#lang racket
(define (make-gen gen)
(let ([cont (box #f)])
(lambda ()
(call/cc (lambda (caller)
I'm seeing the following error message at the end of my 'make install':
...
raco setup: running: sgl/scribblings/sgl.scrbl
raco setup: running: string-constants/string-constants.scrbl
raco setup: running: scribblings/slideshow/slideshow.scrb
The lexical scoping arrows seem to be missing from Check Syntax. Is
this deliberate? Currently using 5.1.1.3--2011-04-21. Thanks!
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
I've isolated a performance issue on form-urlencoded->alist. On
strings with very long key/values, the code appears to consume an
unusual amount of memory. Does the following look ok?
diff --git a/collects/net/uri-codec-unit.rkt b/collects/net/uri-codec-unit.rkt
index c992d62..01d4c05 100644
--
>> "Scheme" is usually a liability when someone used it in school years ago
>> (other than with HtDP).
Small anecdote: I had gone a small presentation at WPI about teaching
alternative concurrent programming models to undergraduates. The
presenter wanted to explore teaching with channels and ac
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:27 PM, John Clements
> wrote:
>> Is there a "best-practice" model for type-case-like things in typed racket
>> yet? Obvious choices:
>>
>> - tagged-list style, it's all a big cond but I have to use first, se
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Yingjian, if you point us to the web page with the problems, we might be
> able to help you more effectively.
Should this conversation be moved to the main Racket mailing list at
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/? My impression wa
I've been staring at the Advanced Query section of the bug tracker:
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?database=default&cmd=advanced%20query
and I have no idea how to get it to tell me what bugs I've submitted.
I tried putting 'd...@cs.wpi.edu' as submitter id, but nothing's
coming up.
__
Just in case this is interesting (or humorous) to the other devs.
I'll be writing up tutorial text for it soon.
---
I'm starting to work on a small example of a non-lisp-like language
that uses the Racket infrastructure. I've chosen the language
Brain@#! since it's obviously not parenthetical.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Why did you sanitize the name? Is this language different than brainfuck?
No real reason: I just didn't want to swear like a sailor.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.r
I've finished up my first draft of the "how to build brainf*ck" tutorial:
http://hashcollision.org/tmp/brainfudge/manual.html
It covers building that language from scratch, using PLaneT to do the
development, and finally how to deploy it back onto PLaneT. It tries
to assume fairly minimal kn
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> I've finished up my first draft of the "how to build brainf*ck" tutorial:
>
> http://hashcollision.org/tmp/brainfudge/manual.html
Thanks for all the feedback! I've updated some material; I completely
reworded t
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> The release process for v5.1.2 will begin in about a week. If
> you have any new features that you want in and are relatively close
> to being done, now is a good time to do that.
Can I assume that the bytecode structures in compiler/zo-par
I'm doing some experiments with structures. I'm trying to write a
macro that lets me create structures that support runtime, dictionary
lookup. I've started with:
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax racket
> I built something like this as a toy for *SL a while back, a throw-away
> prototype. I decided to set up a different property, not to use the procedure
> property. Any reason for the preference?
It's not an important preference. Using a separate structure property
would have worked too for th
Currently doing Program-by-Design workshop.
One issue so far: Help Desk is not giving language-specific help. One
of the users searched for "width", and hit basically every width
function except the one he was looking for. I can't check at the
moment to see if the upcoming DrRacket release fixes
>> > I tried this too and it seems to work for me, even under windows with
>> > firefox.
Sorry: I should have mentioned. I observed the behavior in IE on the
Windows 7 machines in the lab. I believe what's happening is related
to the way IE is prohibiting JavaScript from running on for local
fi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>> > I tried this too and it seems to work for me, even under windows with
>>> > firefox.
>
> Sorry: I should have mentioned. I observed the behavior in IE on the
> Windows 7 machines in the lab. I believe wha
I'm getting an error in the 5.1.1.900 branch when trying to zo-parse a
file. Here's the error I'm seeing:
--
read-marshalled: reader for splice-sequence-type not implemented
===
On Robby and Matthew's suggestion that I look into implementing the
primitives of racket/draw, I took a look at the implementation. If I
understand this correctly, it looks like I need to implement the
methods of the drawing context interface, right?
(If so, there's one obstacle that I'll need t
I'm running into some problem when using dynamic-require-for-syntax:
if the module I'm requiring itself requires another module, I
inevitably hit the following error:
;;;
dyo
>> I'm running into some problem when using dynamic-require-for-syntax:
>
> I imagine the problem is that `dynamic-require-for-syntax' is broken,
> but I hope to get rid of that function because it implements bad
> phase-crossing behavior.
>
> So, although it doesn't directly address the problem, c
I'm updating a few of my PLaneT packages and trying to eliminate
compile-time errors that have been bugging the heck out of me. When I
update the package, I'm seeing the following error message from
PLaneT's web site:
---
Oops! An internal error occured. The problem has been logged, but if
you h
I'm seeing the following error message when I'm compiling Whalesong:
require: unknown module: 'program
raco setup: error: during Building docs for
/home/dyoo/.racket/planet/300/5.1.3/cache/dyoo/closure-compile.plt/1/2/manual.scrbl
;;
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Is this the released 5.1.3? (so it doesn't have the recent change I
> made to the planet module name resolver)?
Yes, I'm running on 5.1.3.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list
How are image snips and pretty-print supposed to interact?
I've isolated the bug that's been preventing image snips from printing
in something like:
;;
#lang htdp/bsl
(require 2htdp/image)
(circle 20 'solid 'green)
;;
>From what I
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Maybe something like this is what you want (but I always get lost in
> the multitude of handlers so this might not be quite the right place
> to put this code).
[diff cut]
Yes, this works for me as well.
_
I tried the following program in ASL. In Definitions:
;
(: g (Number -> Number))
(define g
(lambda (x)
(if (= x 0)
x
(list "three" x
;;
I ran Definitions, and then in my Interactions window, ent
I'm looking at scheme_is_list in src/list.c, and it looks like there's
code that's unreachable, unless I'm reading it wrong?! The body is:
int scheme_is_list(Scheme_Object *obj1)
{
Scheme_Object *obj2;
int flags;
if (SCHEME_PAIRP(obj1)) {
flags = SCHEME_PAIR_FLAGS(obj1);
if (flags
>> Isn't all the code starting from 'obj2 = obj1' unreachable?
>
> No --- the first `if' branch doesn't always return, since its returns
> are protected by another `if'.
Gah. Ok, thanks for the correction. I should stop coding tonight;
I'm not reading things clearly. :)
___
Let's say that I have a graphical file "snips.rkt" with the following content:
;;;
#lang racket/base
(define (f x) (...))
;;;
where (...) is an s-expression that's been collapsed by editing the
file in DrRacket, right clicking the expression, and se
> So there must be some context that I'm missing here. What should I be
> doing to not get this error at the terminal? Thanks!
Following up: I figured out that I need to use (make-gui-namespace) to
create a namespace that knows about the snip classes. e.g.
;
In Whalesong, I've been watching where the compile-time is going,
because I want to make it more pleasant to use. When I compile hello
world, it takes about three seconds to complete the compile on my
machine.
Out of a lark, I wanted to see what the base-line was for just loading
up the modules a
>> I'm observing about a 100ms cost here for something that I expected to
>> be a no-op, because the module has already been required.
>>
>
> You think you could be taking a small GC hit then? "PLTSTDERR=debug"
> environment variable might show GC info. Or add debugging printfs that dump
> "(curr
I'm having some trouble writing a function that takes a program with
image snips, lifting those snips to files, and replacing the snips
with name references. I was wondering if someone seeing anything
trivially wrong in:
https://github.com/dyoo/whalesong/blob/master/expand-out-images.rkt
I'm having a little difficulty understanding the documentation of the
mzlib/pconvert library
(http://docs.racket-lang.org/mzlib/mzlib_pconvert.html) In
particular, I'm trying to understand current-build-share-hook.
The description talks about using the basic-share and a sub-share
functions, but I
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I think you call the first one on the value and the second on each of
> the components of the value where you want to recur.
Ok, then I really don't understand the library. The following appears
to be effective:
;;;
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> The release process for v5.2.1 has begun: the `release' branch was
> created for any work that is left and is now bumped to v5.2.0.900. You
> can go on using the `master' branch as usual, it is now bumped to
> v5.2.1.1 (to avoid having two d
Something strange is happening with 'planet remove' and Whalesong in
the upcoming Racket release. The act of trying to uninstall a PLaneT
package appears to be triggering the immediate re-installation of the
package!
I'm including a transcript below. It looks like the act of Scribble's
regenerati
Hi everyone,
So Whalesong is actually breaking on a few of my test case examples
because 5.2.1 does some aggressive inlining. Specifically, it's doing
intra-module constant optimizations. Whalesong depends on the late
binding of module bindings in some special places (specifically, the
FFI), so
> So Whalesong is actually breaking on a few of my test case examples
> because 5.2.1 does some aggressive inlining. Specifically, it's doing
> intra-module constant optimizations. Whalesong depends on the late
> binding of module bindings in some special places (specifically, the
> FFI), so I ne
> * Danny Yoo
> - Whalesong Tests (confirm that Whalesong runs from PLaneT)
All passed.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> If you compile "a.rkt" normally and set
> `compile-context-preservation-enabled' to #f for"b.rkt", then `f' will
> not be inlined (because inlining is disabled), but `c' will still be
> replaced with 10.
This is odd then, because I thought I had tried this yesterday and
still observed inlining.
> * The `2htdp/universe' library's `big-bang' form supports an
> experimental game pad key handler.
I just want to make sure I know what this is. This is referring to:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bDcsplgE0jFAavvxYWRISpKb1Z94MRPtQ_EjyB3e7hI/edit
right?
_
One of the promises of PLaneT is that it makes it easy to use library
modules without explicit installation.
One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use
programs with implicit PLaneT package installation.
---
Explanation: when I run a program for the first time, and I see a l
>> One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use
>> programs with implicit PLaneT package installation.
>
> It will start with simple explicit installation only. You'd also be
> able to package .zo files and rendered documentation.
Ah, I didn't realize that I sent my happy thou
>
> "Ho Ho!" thought I. "Beginner Student Racket will give a much better error
> message." Actually, though, the error message was much worse: it highlighted
> the id "list-sum-odd" in what should have been the 'else' case, and wrote:
>
> "list-sum-odd: expected a function call, but there is no o
>> This is a variation of one of the cases described in Guillaume's paper
>> on error messages. Figure 4 of
>> http://gmarceau.qc.ca/papers/Marceau-2010-Measuring-Effectiveness.pdf
>
> Yes, I agree. Are you suggesting that there's low-hanging fruit in the form
> of a more general solution?
I'm
One of the things I'm encountering on the Brown network file system,
is that the number of files loaded by DrRacket causes some strain on
their systems. I checked with the admins here, and by their count,
opening up DrRacket or doing things with 'raco make' can open about a
thousand files at start
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 02:14 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>
>> The Java folks have a notion of ".jar" files that pack a collection of
>> class files into a single archive, but also make it possible to load
>> cla
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Blake Johnson wrote:
> I think that mod-requires just has the explicitly declared requires for each
> phase. In the demodularizer, we have to trace through the requires to get
> all phase 0 code.
Ok, good. But the word "requires" is overloaded by the context, so
> Do you agree that, not only do I have to visit the modules explicitly
> listed in mod-requires, but also the phase-0 ModuleVariable references
> in the module variables in the module's prefix-toplevels?
Followup: ok, this seems like what you're doing in nodep-module:
http://pre.racket-lang.
> That is, if "test.rkt" requires "helper.rkt" with a phase shift of 1,
> and "helper.rkt" requires `racket/list' with a phase shift of -1, then
> "test.rkt" needs `racket/list' at phase 0.
Ah! Thank you! That makes much more sense to me now. So I really
must do something like this to get the f
> It seems like it wouldn't be too hard to turn the "Quick" guide into
> something similar by using something like WeScheme. I also know of several
> people who have expressed interest in learning to program but definitely
> don't have the motivation to go through HtDP. It seems like the codecademy
I'm getting confused by some behavior with regards to paren-shape.
Here's what I see:
#lang racket
;;
(define-for-syntax (square-brackets? stx)
(eq? (syntax-property stx 'paren-shape) #\[))
(define-syntax (squa
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> It comes from the way syntax properties are propagated through macro
> transformers. There is some explanation of this in the docs; search
> for syntax-property and scroll up.
Ok. Yikes, this is more complicated than I expected. Thanks.
> Many of you noticed that DrRacket v5.2.1 refused to launch today, March 26.
> We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience.
Checking: can a reference to this announcement be on the front page of
the racket-lang web site?
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-
Hi everyone,
I'm running into some unexpected behavior with regards to how
scribble/eval drives an evaluator in an @interaction. When I do
something like this:
@interaction[#:eval my-eval
"foobar"]
I see that my-eval is being fed an s-expression of the form:
`(b
On Monday, April 2, 2012, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> The release process for v5.3 will begin in about a week. If
> you have any new features that you want in and are relatively close
> to being done, now is a good time to do that.
>
Is submodule support going to be a part of 5.3?
_
>> Would it be equivalent behavior to turn the datum into a syntax object
>> instead? That is:
>>
>> ;; within do-plain-eval:
>> (cond [(syntax? s)
>> (syntax-case s (module)
>> [(module . _rest) (syntax->datum s)]
>>
I'm hitting some behavior I don't understand: here's code to demonstrate:
;;
#lang racket
(require racket/stxparam racket/splicing)
(define-syntax-parameter current-def #f)
(define-syntax (def stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
> If that doesn't seem clear, can you explain more your line of reasoning
> that they should be the same?
I guess I'm having a hard time with this: I want to get the value of
a-placeholder into the place marked ??? in the following:
;;;
>> I suspect that I should be using quote-syntax at this specific point,
>> but I am not completely sure.
>
> Right. Try replacing ??? with (quote-syntax #,a-placeholder).
I have to admit that I'm still confused. Here's my example:
;;;
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael W wrote:
> This seems to work for me, printing 84, just like you expect:
>
> ;
>
> (define-syntax (def stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(_ (name args ...) body ...)
> (with-syntax ([function-
> (define-syntax (def stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(_ (name args ...) body ...)
> (with-syntax ([function-stx stx])
> (syntax/loc stx
> (define (name args ...)
> (splicing-syntax-parameterize ([current-def
> (quote-syntax fuunctio
>
> At the time 'def' is expanded, the lexical context of 'function-stx' does
> not include the bindings of 'args'. But then the macro produces an
> expression with that term inside a 'quote-syntax' form that is inside the
> scope of the 'args'. So by the time the expander gets to the 'quote-syntax
> Ah ha! So that's where my mental model is diverging from reality.
> Thank you. For some reason, I had been thinking that the
> transformer-time expression in the syntax-parameterize was somehow
> impervious to the lexical enrichment process.
Here's the first draft of a small tutorial on the p
I'm trying to prepare a patch to fix pr 12683 (zero-width space).
Currently, I've got:
https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/ed6570d482acada2027988903c11e08ffac03e3c
However, at this point, I get stuck, because I have no idea where to
mix-in this into the DrRacket text% instance. I did grep
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
> How about just changing the way nbsp->space-mixin so that it just does
> both jobs (perhaps with overridable methods or settable fields that
> provide finer-grained control)?
>
> As for where it is wired in,
> Traced! Something happened in 2007, and commit
> 8bd72e512da3345d1d3514d2bb3f9148c7a93b39 turned it off. I haven't
> haven't been able to trace the reason why it needed to be removed
> though.
Just to note: I did the following git command to trace it:
$ git log -S'nbsp->space' --all
___
> Just to note: I did the following git command to trace it:
>
> $ git log -S'nbsp->space' --all
Ah ha! Here's the thread on plt-internal which motivated the change:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/plt-internal/private/2007-March/011601.html
As I understand it, the reason for removal was b
> However, from earlier on the thread, it's clear that zero-width space
> doesn't play by the same rules, so re-instituting the solution from
> nbsp->space for DrRacket might be the right thing to do.
Followup: here's what I've got:
https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/ed6570d482acada202798
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>
>> I want the behavior of the auto-translator to notify the text has
>> changed, so that if the user opens a file in DrRacket with the zero
>> width space, they can Save the fi
I'm trying to wrap my head around submodules so I can get it working
with Whalesong, but I'm running into an issue:
#lang racket
(define (print-cake n)
#;(show " ~a " n #\.)
#;(show " .-~a-. " n #\|)
#;(show " | ~a | " n #\space)
(show "---~a---" n #\-))
(define (show fmt n ch)
(pr
>> I'm trying to wrap my head around submodules so I can get it working
>> with Whalesong
I see that the structure of 'mod' has changed a bit to accommodate
submodules; in particular, mod-name can now be a list of symbols vs
just a symbol, comparing:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/decompi
This no longer appears to work in 5.3:
#lang planet dyoo/bf
,[.,]
I'm not sure how to fix this. Help? I see the following error message:
###
kui ~/tmp $ racket hello.rkt
resolved-module-path-name: expects argument of type
; given
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> This no longer appears to work in 5.3:
>
> #lang planet dyoo/bf
> ,[.,]
>
> I'm not sure how to fix this. Help? I see the following error message:
Ok, bug traced. It looks like module-declared? is being used l
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Yes, normalization doesn't deal with those spaces. It does change the
> text in ways that are unfriendly and I often tell DrRacket "no" when
> it asks about normalization. I just wanted to put that into the mix
> for this conversation, since
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I've pushed a repair for this bug.
Ah, thank you! I will try it out as soon as it hits the 5.3 release branch.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> * Danny Yoo
> - Whalesong Tests (confirm that Whalesong runs from PLaneT)
I'm currently blocked on this. Whalesong depends on "#lang planet" to
work, but due to a bug, I haven't been able to make progress on
running the tests. There is a a patch in master
(http
+1 on the delay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I'm working on building a Scribble extension that lets me write
conditional bits of Scribble code.
Some use cases: 1. writing a document that can be author-anonymized
2. tutorial material, with solutions to be generated in the document
targetted for teachers.
I do not want to hide or show conten
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> For HtDP/2e, I use plain old conditionals and variables.
> I used to set an environment variable when I ran a shell
> script. Then I converted everything to Racket and set
> variables according to shell arguments:
>
> $ ./xhtml draft
> IMO, anyone who is not coming from some kind of Scheme background
> would view this as ridiculously long. If they're renamed to the usual
> names, things look much better:
>
> (parameterize ([stderr (stdout)])
> ...)
Definitely +1.
_
Racket Developers list:
htt
... for example, why not set up files that set some parameter and then
> run the program. You said that you want a `++load my-module.rkt' --
> why not change "my-module.rkt" -> "my-module.scrbl", and just render
> it?
>
I like this. But I don't want the "configuration" scribble file to itself
ge
With the submodule support, the following is a legal program:
#lang racket
#lang racket
Is this intentional?
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I could have sworn that:
https://git.racket-lang.org/
took me to a nice HTML view of the git repository, but at the moment,
I see an empty page.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> source to find the information. Submodules solve the problem of having
> extra information in a module that is not loaded with the module's
> code, so the `expand' approach is not longer necessary.
Do the submodules then have a specific name that the external tools
know about? Let me look at th
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Yesterday, Danny Yoo wrote:
> > I could have sworn that:
> >
> > https://git.racket-lang.org/
> >
> > took me to a nice HTML view of the git repository, but at the
> > moment, I see an empty page.
>
>> Would it be possible to extend the sort function to allow for multiple
>> keys to facilitate sorting lists of lists or lists of structs.
The sort function should accommodate this by providing a custom
comparator as the second (optional) argument to it.
When building custom comparators, you mig
Just to follow up on this: in my conditional scribble language, I've
needed a splicing style for itemlists, because certain items may or
may not show depending on context.
Just in case this happens to be helpful for anyone else, here's the
helper I'm using:
;;;
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:01 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> I'm trying to build WeScheme locally, and wrestling with Eclipse.
> Specifically, I've completed all of the steps given in the README, and I'm
> now trying to figure out how to deploy it. It appears to me that I'll need
> to use Eclipse,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Just a reminder that testing for release v5.3 begins Monday.
Ok, understood! Unfortunately, Whalesong won't initially have support
for submodules.
I'm currently addressing type errors that I'm getting from the new
verson of Typed Racket.
I'm seeing segfaults when trying to build the release on my uber
64-bit Ubuntu box. (I'm on c9d0319a11cb2aae6d1e81d0c6465b4241a4ecff)
raco setup: 2 running: picturing-programs/picturing-programs.scrbl
raco setup: 1 running: plai/scribblings/plai.scrbl
raco setup: 2 running: planet/planet.scrbl
r
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> This looks like a crash that I've seen, but only a couple of times over
> months. For the crash I saw, control was in libpixman via libcairo
> during the rendering of the Plot manual, but I haven't been able to
> replicate it to investigate f
> * Danny Yoo
> - Whalesong Tests (confirm that Whalesong runs from PLaneT)
Just wanted to confirm that Whalesong in development is running under 5.2.900.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I tried building from scratch again from
c9d0319a11cb2aae6d1e81d0c6465b4241a4ecff and see the following:
raco setup: 1 running: plot/scribblings/plot.scrbl
raco setup: 2 running: preprocessor/scribblings/preprocessor.scrbl
raco setup: 2 running: scribblings/quick/quick.scrbl
raco setup: 2 runnin
> I've pushed the change to the git repo's master branch. Please let me
> know whether a build on your machine works with this change.
Sorry for the delay! I confirm that I'm not seeing the crash under
master (44161d73c8bdce0374718d1ab0bc20fbebc1fec2) on my system.
_
Ra
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo