Re: [racket-dev] experiment reorganizing the repo into packages

2013-05-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
, "eventually" so maybe not now) - tests/* (looks like it's not done yet) - There's a weird .gitignore in racket/collects/pkg which looks like some erroneous leftover. > Meanwhile, part of this experiment is defining "-lib" packages that > do not provide documentation, which means they can have fewer > build-time dependencies than they would need for documentation. The > "-docs" packages provide the corresponding documentation. (I'm not > sure about the naming convention; I just had to pick something for > now.) Naturally, the "X" package pulls in both the "X-lib" and > "X-doc" packages. To clarify, after staring at this for some hours, I really prefer it if there's a way to keep it all together and do everything within the package system. (At least havine 3 repos for N packages sound like a very unfun thing to deal with.) But I do want the ability to have these partial-contents packages built for distribution. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
active/lang/reader.ss collects/racket/unit/lang/reader.ss 09bed0d Kevin Tew (1 year, 3 months ago) Initial Distributed Places commit C100 collects/combinator-parser/info.rkt collects/racket/place/distributed/info.rkt e788903 Eli Barzilay (1 year, 9 months ago) Remove a bunch of no-longer-n

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Friday, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 24 May 2013 12:44:35 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > * The script should also take care to deal with files that got > > > > removed in the past. > > > > > > Ditto. > > > > I don't believ

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
Four hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 24 May 2013 03:26:45 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > If that can be done reliabely, then of course it makes it possible to > > do the split reliabley after the first restructure. > > Great! Let's do that, because I remain co

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: binary vs source

2013-05-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
to decide how their package gets installed, so for example, if realm must be distributed with its sources, it can just specify that and avoid the stripping that other packages would go through. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: h

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
8 hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 23 May 2013 07:09:17 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > "Relevant history" is vague. > > The history I want corresponds to `git log --follow' on each of the > files that end up in a repository. (In this context this is cle

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
the separate repositories. > > Is that the point? The thing is that having two such filters (one to restructure the big repository and one to split it) is both increasing chances for making mistakes, and making the job of the second restructure much harder to do.

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
Just now, Carl Eastlund wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem wrong to me.  It's an accurate representation > > of the history of the project, whi

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > 9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote: > > I was going to comment on the same thing.  While a naive use > > of "git filter-branch" might not retain the history

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
t no file ends with a newline...) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
9 hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:41 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > That's true, but the downside of changing the structure and having > > files and directories move post structure change will completely > > destroy the relevant edit history o

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages

2013-05-22 Thread Eli Barzilay
about much more than a 28M thing. The smaller thing is at a point where you won't worry about it beind left somewhere, and at a point where it's fine to installed as a kind of a shared runtime thing for someone who wants to distribute racket-based applications. -- ((lambda (

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-22 Thread Eli Barzilay
y people who are not dealing with packages. (And as a side note: even in the imaginary case that eventually there's some anti-package or anti-repo-split revolution, nothing is lost, since the result is still a better build + distribution process.) -- ((l

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-21 Thread Eli Barzilay
27;t like submodules, you just don't use it. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-21 Thread Eli Barzilay
to adjust too which should make the whole process more comfortable. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages: repository

2013-05-20 Thread Eli Barzilay
or most people, switch to having them as the main place: start mirroring the repos on github (and elsewhere), and remove the monolithic one. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] svn server going mostly read-only

2013-05-12 Thread Eli Barzilay
JFYI, I've made the svn server be mostly read-only. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] else clauses: possible change to match?

2013-05-05 Thread Eli Barzilay
ror. (And BTW, I think that `match' is also an exceptional example in how this will go: (let ([else 1]) (match x [else ...])) which is a little more confusing than the same with `cond'.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] racket2 suggestion: removing (or extending) eqv?

2013-05-04 Thread Eli Barzilay
worrying about other implementations, is there some use for `eqv?' that doesn't fit `eq?' or `equal?'? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _

Re: [racket-dev] else clauses: possible change to match?

2013-05-03 Thread Eli Barzilay
nk that it's good to have a much more relaxed policy about breaking compatibility in cases like this: so far there was no real code found that uses the feature, but there is one instance of code that would get fixed by the change...] -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x

Re: [racket-dev] TR tests sometimes fail with a promise error

2013-05-03 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > At Fri, 3 May 2013 11:56:02 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > (define (delay/thread thunk) > > (let () > > (define p (make-promise/thread #f)) > > (pset! p (make-running-thread (thread (λ() ...same...

Re: [racket-dev] TR tests sometimes fail with a promise error

2013-05-03 Thread Eli Barzilay
thing along these lines can work instead of some explicit syncing: (define (delay/thread thunk) (let () (define p (make-promise/thread #f)) (pset! p (make-running-thread (thread (λ() ...same...)))) p)) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))

Re: [racket-dev] else clauses: possible change to match?

2013-05-03 Thread Eli Barzilay
ink since I've done it, other people must > have done it too. This could annoy them. Do you have an actual use that would *break*? That is, something like (match x ... [else else]) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: h

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.4

2013-05-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
7b6a8, 2cdfe18b, 3af72eca) Maybe add a "misc" item with an enumeration of these things? (Just a word on each so there's a hook for looking in the docs for the new feature.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.4, Final Draft

2013-05-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
Racket distribution to the Racket package repository. It might be good to include some very quick instructions on how to install it. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26623: master branch updated

2013-04-12 Thread Eli Barzilay
50 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: > Did you consider adding a test case? I have one, but did not commit it since I waited for a build to finish last night. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.

Re: [racket-dev] take/drop argument order

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-04-11 12:05:59 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Remove the `*f' functions from the interface, and change the > > non-`*f' functions to accept keywords as follows: > > > > (take #:num N L) > > (ta

Re: [racket-dev] take/drop argument order

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
:until P L) etc while keeping the current arguments as a compatibility feature. Another possibility is adding a `#:from-end' keyword for the `*-right' variants (and keep the existing ones for compatibility). 50 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > About two weeks ag

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26536: master branch updated

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
ing so. Meanwhile, I've added this to the above item: Also, make it possible to always use a procedure where an arity is expected. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26536: master branch updated

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
values.  Manipulating them is > also useful for producing error messages that describe the arity of > procedure values.  I don't see any reason to close this stuff off, > when it's the one useful, non-opaque aspect of procedure values. > > Carl Eastlund > > On Thu,

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26536: master branch updated

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
unctions. > | > | Added contract checking to arity=?, arity-includes?, and normalized-arity. > | Removed contract checking from normalize-arity to make it a total predicate. > | Updated documentation for normalize-arity to reflect this change. > : > M collects/racket/function

Re: [racket-dev] take/drop argument order

2013-04-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
About two weeks ago, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > Late reply, but better than never. > > On 2013-03-10 16:20:14 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Assuming this, here's a suggestion that I made in the past for > > resolving this: > > > > * Make the existing `

Re: [racket-dev] Packages

2013-04-08 Thread Eli Barzilay
50 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > It all starts at how someone is expected to approach developing a > > "package", regardless of how this is defined in the current > > system. A quick way to get t

Re: [racket-dev] Packages

2013-04-08 Thread Eli Barzilay
rth working on it or not. (And I'm assuming that you're suggesting that that such a patch is fine if it's possible to implement without me realizing on the way some reasons against it.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:

[racket-dev] Packages

2013-04-08 Thread Eli Barzilay
specified in the package's toplevel info.rkt file, which "pkg create" would check, but with a default of non-"--root" this means changing existing repositories. This is a relatively minor change, but I think that conceptually it greatly simplifies things. One of the main problems I had with planet is that it was too heavy for random users. The new system is certainly lighter, but I think that such a change will make it significantly more usable in that it's much closer to "just dump your bunch of files on the web". -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] "Add Teachpack" dialog can be very confusing

2013-04-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
ams) or (require 2htdp/image). It could be simplified into some new simplified `require' that is easier for kids -- like (use image). -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _

Re: [racket-dev] Purpose of typed/racket/no-check

2013-04-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
th. (At least IMO.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Purpose of typed/racket/no-check

2013-04-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
till use `:' instead of going back to comments. (But it's obviously a weak point.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] build: schemef.h -> schemex.h

2013-03-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
ow everything away and re-"git clone" for an automated > build machine. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] build: schemef.h -> schemex.h

2013-03-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
Git doesn't track modification times (intentionally), so a fresh clone should have all of the dates be the same. If you update the tree (eg, if you checkout a different branch), then files that were modified get a new date -- as usual. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))

[racket-dev] take/drop argument order

2013-03-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
sane order only. * The new *f functions can use only the sane order. * And another thing that can be done to reduce the name clutter is to have only the plain names, but make them accept either an index or a predicate. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:

Re: [racket-dev] take, drop, split-at, etc -- and argument order, again

2013-03-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
nt in using both the *f and the regular functions, so changing the require for a whole file wouldn't be useful in general. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ R

Re: [racket-dev] take, drop, split-at, etc -- and argument order, again

2013-03-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote: > #lang racket2 ? That is much later than I hoped. (And when it comes, I certainly hope it won't be `racket2'.) > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > It's no committed & pushed.  With the bad argument

Re: [racket-dev] take, drop, split-at, etc -- and argument order, again

2013-03-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
t to make them all require (proper) lists. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] take, drop, split-at, etc -- and argument order, again

2013-03-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > >Here's why I think it might be useless: > >For just `takef-right', it's possible to do something smart that >scans the list in order, keeping a pointer to the beginning of >the "current good block&

[racket-dev] take,drop,split-at, etc -- and argument order, again

2013-03-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
to make these functions work with improper lists -- which is in-line with other questionable srfi-1 inheritance.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26426: master branch updated

2013-03-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
e version. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
s...) > It appears that module names are not indexed? Probably they should be? They are already indexed, but it happens to be a very popular name so there are tons of results before it. (Try searching for "stxparam" to see that it works.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x)

Re: [racket-dev] using Racket to build an image-based Lisp: feasible?

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
Four hours ago, mikel evins wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > Aha -- in that case, it seems that your image-based workflow is > > not much different from working with just the sources *and* the > > (byte-) compiled files that go

Re: [racket-dev] using Racket to build an image-based Lisp: feasible?

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
would be some scanner that turns it into something that can, maybe adding some representation layer on top of plain values. Making it work for everything else (including required modules etc) that you can reach from the namespace is probably "the only thing" that is needed... --

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
d now are inaccessible... Once I switch docs you'll have them too. (Maybe I should do that now? It's a quick flip-of-a-symlink thing...) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
- ------- -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-05 Thread Eli Barzilay
place in all pages, and some of them don't have a version box. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] using Racket to build an image-based Lisp: feasible?

2013-03-05 Thread Eli Barzilay
add1 x) (+ x 1.0))?) And yes, I know that the way to address these things is in the process -- organizing your snapshots etc -- but on the flip side of that you have similar things that people use with source-code (like a repository for source snapshots). -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (

Re: [racket-dev] using Racket to build an image-based Lisp: feasible?

2013-03-05 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, mikel evins wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > An hour and a half ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > >> > >> I have empathy for your perspective, because I have worked with > >> images and -- at the t

Re: [racket-dev] using Racket to build an image-based Lisp: feasible?

2013-03-05 Thread Eli Barzilay
re useful than images. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-02 Thread Eli Barzilay
. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
Two hours ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Two hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > The content column is wider than in the normal documentation > > display. That makes line-spanning paragraphs a little less nice > > to read, and it makes right-margin notes more likely to fall o

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-03-01 Thread Eli Barzilay
Two hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:36:54 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > * The layout should have the main column centered. (I thought that it > > was fine initially if the left column is part of the contents.) > > That column alignme

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
Just now, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > * The layout should have the main column centered. (I thought that > it was fine initially if the left column is part of the contents.) BTW, resolving this should happen at the CSS level, perhaps just reorganizing them should make it work. But if no

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
Yesterday, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-02-26 09:53:11 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > I have finally implemented a script that hacks the on-line doc > > pages. Currently, it does the following (and you can see the > > changes on the web now): > > Maybe I'm mi

Re: [racket-dev] `math' compilation time !!!

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote: > According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"), > compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation. I'm surprised that nobody finds this disturbing. Maybe it was the lack of bangs in the subject. -- (

[racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-02-26 Thread Eli Barzilay
script for a description of how you run it. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] I'd like to add a sidebar link to all documentation versions in docs.racket-lang.org.

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:16:13 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Two hours ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > I think that this should be reverted, and instead make the older > > > docs more available: I'll make another column in t

[racket-dev] `math' compilation time

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"), compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/

Re: [racket-dev] I'd like to add a sidebar link to all documentation versions in docs.racket-lang.org.

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
The main problem is having a tweaked version of the pages on the web -- which is needed, for example, since such a dropdown box would make no sense for the documentation pages on your own installation. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http:

Re: [racket-dev] I'd like to add a sidebar link to all documentation versions in docs.racket-lang.org.

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
Two hours ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I think that this should be reverted, and instead make the older > docs more available: I'll make another column in the all-versions > page (main page > download > all versions). Done, now. See the new links on the all versions page, and

Re: [racket-dev] I'd like to add a sidebar link to all documentation versions in docs.racket-lang.org.

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
page (main page > download > all versions). -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26347: master branch updated

2013-02-23 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote: > Did someone let the EOPL folks know about this change, in case they > want to check things over? Yes, David okayed it, and I ran the tests too, just in case. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:

Re: [racket-dev] Expression comments

2013-02-22 Thread Eli Barzilay
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] , en and enter! sometimes do nothing, and it's changing over releases?

2013-02-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
sample you could share? I'm not sure what exactly you're after, but you can get most of that using a ,switch command to create a new namespace, then using it with a "!" flag to reset it. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzila

Re: [racket-dev] , en and enter! sometimes do nothing, and it's changing over releases?

2013-02-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
er does that too. (And otherwise, it should.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] , en and enter! sometimes do nothing, and it's changing over releases?

2013-02-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
submod "." bar) [,bt for context] I'm not sure about these, but IIRC, there was a similar question about doing the same in drr. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] , en and enter! sometimes do nothing, and it's changing over releases?

2013-02-10 Thread Eli Barzilay
er!' being somewhat limited as they are now, and using a proper meta tool when needed. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Why is the Systems Programming guide using console-oriented Racket?

2013-01-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
t frankly, I don't get this. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] garbagename.racket-lang.org leads to Racket @ Israel?

2013-01-26 Thread Eli Barzilay
t; anybogusname.racket-lang.org > > Leads to a directory listing which contains only a link to > > http://anybogusname.racket-lang.org/il/ > > … which looks accidental. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barz

Re: [racket-dev] Performance Lab

2013-01-22 Thread Eli Barzilay
ticularly important if it's going to send out alerts when performance changes much. And BTW, for performance, it would be nice to alert on all changes, not just when it goes up... -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzil

Re: [racket-dev] 5.3.2 & mac os x

2013-01-20 Thread Eli Barzilay
p://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/DeveloperTools/ > Conceptual/SoftwareDistribution4/SoftwareDistribution4.pdf > > (I believe this document is called "legacy" because of the mac app > store; DrRacket cannot yet be distributed that way for technical > reaso

Re: [racket-dev] 5.3.2 & mac os x

2013-01-20 Thread Eli Barzilay
Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: > Thanks. There was supposed to be a background image that points from > one to the other. (I think that on 10.4 the bg image is expected not to show...) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.2

2013-01-19 Thread Eli Barzilay
30 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > >> for more information and list your packages on the new index > >> [https://pnr.racket-lang.org/]. We anticipate it will leave beta > >> during the nex

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.2

2013-01-19 Thread Eli Barzilay
something about how to get it, and where it can be useful. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.3.2

2013-01-18 Thread Eli Barzilay
e this on for now. (The rest are done.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3.2

2013-01-18 Thread Eli Barzilay
t;leave beta" thing sounds very confusing. 10 hours ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > > * Added `define-inline' which defines functions that are guaranteed > to be inlined. -1 to including this. (But I object to having it too.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x))

[racket-dev] Planet2 urls

2013-01-09 Thread Eli Barzilay
racket-lang.org that has a user-oriented interface, which would also free pnr.racket-lang.org to be something more machine friendly and more cryptic. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is L

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.3.2 has begun

2013-01-08 Thread Eli Barzilay
issues) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.3.2 has begun

2013-01-08 Thread Eli Barzilay
latively easy to resolve, but I think that it's an indication of an infrastructure that is not yet ready to be released as is.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26024: master branch updated

2013-01-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
gt; Do you have any ideas for a solution to this? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] package install mode

2013-01-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
bda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] help with our mac os x installer?

2013-01-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
the desired layout. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] package install mode

2013-01-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Jan 6, 2013 1:27 PM, "Matthew Flatt" wrote: > At Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:42:52 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > I have been thinking about how developers who build their own Racket > > > are more likely to want installation-

Re: [racket-dev] package install mode

2013-01-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
dependency graphs which will cause huge problems when trying to get to a small core. (/me does an image query for "repent".) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!

Re: [racket-dev] package install mode

2013-01-06 Thread Eli Barzilay
le), I think that it's best to have the same default for all setups, and use an installation-wide installs by default only when asked explicitly. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Expression comments

2012-12-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
I think that there is a point in keeping the colors so it would be best to have some indication of comment-ness that gets added, like a different background. On Dec 27, 2012 10:48 PM, "Matthias Felleisen" wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > > it would be best if they tu

[racket-dev] Working with github pull requests

2012-12-18 Thread Eli Barzilay
ed, but they're the | ones currently available. I'll add your description of a new type | of permissions as a feature request, and show the team. I didn't hear anything else about it, so I don't know if they'll add it or not. Feel free to nag the

Re: [racket-dev] URL escaping: question for web experts

2012-12-17 Thread Eli Barzilay
sibility of old code breaking... -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Typed versions of untyped collections

2012-12-17 Thread Eli Barzilay
20 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Neil Toronto wrote: > > > > On 12/16/2012 06:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > >> > >> 10 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote: > >>> > >>> I think I'd rather have

[racket-dev] URL escaping: question for web experts

2012-12-17 Thread Eli Barzilay
the default without consulting some potential web standard gurus. So? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [DrDr] R25903 (timeout 0) (unclean 1) (stderr 1) (changes 63)

2012-12-16 Thread Eli Barzilay
10 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote: > On 12/16/2012 05:58 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > 20 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote: > >> I got this email from DrDr after I added `typed/plot'. The error: > >> [] > > > > BTW, I did point out the failure when

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [DrDr] R25903 (timeout 0) (unclean 1) (stderr 1) (changes 63)

2012-12-16 Thread Eli Barzilay
The bigger question is the actual ownership: since that code is clearly yours, it is much better to keep it in your code. This will also simplify things later when you have a single directory for your package rather than a bunch of files. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >