Dan Liebgold wrote on 01/06/2015 02:00 PM:
What is a straightforward way to designate the "compiled" directory to
look for zo files in that can be based on the Racket version? I'd
like to have Racket 5.2.1 and 6.1 running in parallel to aid in
upgrading our version.
Thanks!
I'd like for thi
I don't think I need charity.
I thought the vision for the new package system had already been
explained adequately. I would be very interested to learn how the model
is well-suited to third-party developers like me.
But -- I mean this constructively -- I'd be happy if someone simply came
o
Eli Barzilay wrote on 12/02/2014 09:31 PM:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Leif Andersen wrote:
Just to clarify a bit, we were more thinking of extending the default
repl to have line editing features, rather then making xrepl the
default,
If you're talking about implementing line editing yo
I think this "what's the matter with conflicts, and an arbitrary package
putting things wherever it wants, and not having a notion of
non-backward-compatibility" is similar to "what's the matter with using
eval for everything" or "what's the matter with defmacro" or "what's the
big deal about h
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote on 11/30/2014 12:52 PM:
Are you saying that `data` is some kind of classification of "what this
module is about", and in this case specifically, "this module, which is part
of some more specific package, happens to be regarding general-purpose data
structures, so we're
Jay McCarthy wrote on 11/30/2014 12:30 PM:
On Sunday, November 30, 2014, Neil Van Dyke <mailto:n...@neilvandyke.org>> wrote:
Jay McCarthy wrote on 11/30/2014 12:13 PM:
The documentation cited is making clear that there is NO
connection between the name of a pa
Jay McCarthy wrote on 11/30/2014 12:13 PM:
The documentation cited is making clear that there is NO connection
between the name of a package and the provided modules. There is no
such thing as a package namespace.
I'd really like there to be. For third-party packages.
Packages may find it
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote on 11/30/2014 10:55 AM:
Another example where this happens (and in a way that couldn't be
fixed by combining packages) is with typed versions of libraries. If I
release a package with the collection `foo`, and then someone else
produces a typed version of it, that will p
Any chance of revisiting the new package system's stances on versions --
specifically, on the two issues:
1. Can subsequent versions of a named package (which has an identity)
be non-backward-compatible?
2. Can a Racket setup (and even an individual program) have multiple
versions of a package
Given the example from the documentation, of the `tic-tac-toe` package
and "conflicts" (quoted at end of this email), instead, why isn't the
norm to do:
(require tic-tac-toe)
Or, when necessary:
(require tic-tac-toe/matrix)
Why, when one installs a package named `tic-tac-toe`, would
Roman Klochkov wrote at 07/06/2014 10:15 PM:
What about 3rd party modules?
For example, should
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/dherman/syntactic-closures.plt/1/0/syntactic-closures.ss provide
syntactic-closures-compile, syntactic-closures-execute and
syntactic-closures-scheme-syn
For documented public API of modules that are part of core Racket,
shouldn't pretty much all the identifiers be descriptive enough to be
unique within the scope of core Racket? (Excepting name conflicts from
SRFIs and teaching languages?)
I've now noticed generic API names like "make" and "re
Loop syntax and sugar is fine. And having "#:continue" and "#:break"
keywords at the top of the form is sufficient warning of surprises
ahead, IMHO.
I do have a minor ongoing concern that people coming from other
languages lately latch onto the "for" family of forms from the start,
don't get
If adding break&continue features to your fancy iteration syntax, I
propose that any uses of these features in source code be somehow very
prominent.
For example, perhaps there is a keyword that must be at the top of the
fancy iteration form, something like
"#:enable-continue-here-because-pro
FYI, a 6.0.1 install from source failed. I can't spend any time on it
right now.
System: 32-bit x86 dual-core, Debian Squeeze, no virtualization, no
swap, 3 GB RAM total, almost 2 GB RAM free.
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/racket-6.0.1 --enable-both
[[...]]
$ make both
[[...]]
$ sudo mak
Just remember, any self-respecting "benchmark" feature of a platform
will detect standard benchmarks and substitute hand-tuned assembler. :)
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Jens Axel Søgaard wrote at 05/06/2014 02:02 PM:
Sam:
Could we
- warn people when they use `time` in DrRacket?
- provide a "performance" mode that runs programs out-of-process, or
just in another place?
- something else?
I like this. DrRacket has a performance mode already (disable
profil
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 04/26/2014 08:13 PM:
I'm confused about what you're suggesting, then. Is there a
difference, under your suggestion, between opening DrRacket for the
first time, entering `1` in the definitions window, and hitting run,
and doing that same thing in an existing DrRacke
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 04/26/2014 08:06 PM:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 04/26/2014 07:26 PM:
On this topic (which is about the "Choose a language" language that
DrRacket starts in when newly installed), I think we s
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 04/26/2014 07:26 PM:
On this topic (which is about the "Choose a language" language that
DrRacket starts in when newly installed), I think we should just
delete all of this code, and start in "the Racket language".
How about make Run and other very language-specific
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 04/22/2014 01:37 PM:
I think we should dedicate this commit to Kate Bush's PI song (or vice versa?):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZSHr5E7fZY
Are Kate Bush dedications a slippery slope? Software developers will
tend to work towards the metrics. Soon the can
For purposes of your course project, couldn't you make your own
class-instance object system, atop structs or hashes, that gives you
whatever dynamic programming features you want? It's very-very easy to
do a basic one (with single inheritance and single dispatch), until you
get into speed opt
Matthew Flatt wrote at 04/16/2014 01:56 PM:
(set! needed? #t)
(queue-callback (lambda () (when needed?
(set! needed? #f)
(send this refresh)))
#f) ; => low priority
This is what I'd try first. If it works well
Robby Findler wrote at 04/14/2014 01:27 PM:
I think that the problem Neil is having with it is the ridiculous
amount of spam that gets trapped inside it.
(But correct me if I'm wrong, Neil!)
I also have other objections to it. But if Doug is still using it, I
guess leaving it running makes
In the new documentation layout, the zoom-to-fit-width behavior is bad.
I mentioned this before
("http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-November/060480.html";), but
I don't recall hearing any rationale, and it doesn't seem to have changed.
Is this going to be changed, or do I have t
Can the PLaneT bug-tracking system be shut down, please?
(I have never wanted my packages to be in the PLaneT bug-tracking
system. It has never been anything for me but counterproductive and
annoying. It was not there when I first added my packages to PLaneT. I
really-really want to opt-out
Edward, your patch sounds OK to me, FWIW.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
* Is anyone up to auditing the C code? To support my earlier concern
("http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2014-February/013935.html";),
you've probably heard in the last few days about a C oops bug in OpenSSL
that has compromised the private keys of 2/3 of the Internet for over a
year no
ument, and the free-form legal blurb at the end of the
document). Example at: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-roomba/
I've started to also add a one-line copyright notice at the top of each
source file in the package, something like ";; Copyright Neil Van Dyke.
See file info.rkt.&q
Edward Lee wrote at 02/08/2014 05:52 PM:
[...]
Racket's OpenSSL bindings do not currently enable the ECDH(E) and the
DHE ciphers, which are needed for perfect forward secrecy.
I've attached a patch that:
[...]
First, thanks for taking the initiative and contributing. Second, I
feel a lit
The 5.92 CSS also doesn't seem to differentiate the different link types
by color or other visual emphasis.
IMHO, this is a step backwards, especially when it comes to visually
distinguishing the three kinds of links: (1) identifier definition; (2)
"tech", and (3) everything else. As I said i
What's the status of the package system?
This morning I thought I'd compromise, and use the new package system
for a package that would only ever need one version installed per Racket
installation (though I still really want multiple-installed-version
support for libraries, like PLaneT has in
Any chance that 6.0 will read symbols beginning with ":" (other than ":"
exactly) as keywords?
(I was thinking that a major version number might be a good time to do
this change, in case anyone is concerned that the change might break
some code somewhere. IIRC, someone said there was a SRFI i
I'm speaking of third-party packages only; I don't know about the
packages that make up core Racket. (But perhaps whatever is done for
any special needs of core Racket can avoid complicating things for
third-party packages.)
For third-party packages, for the audience of technical users of Rac
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 08/20/2013 09:52 AM:
Can you say more about why this is? Is it the pictures?
Yes, I scroll down the page and I see pictures and a simple picture
language, and it seems to be using them to introduce some pretty simple
and familiar concepts, so I assume it's for
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 08/20/2013 09:40 AM:
Are you referring to the "Quick" tutorial? I don't think that's aimed
at children, per se -- just people who have no experience w/ Racket.
OK, I can only offer a single data point: to me, one glance at the
"Quick" tutorial looks like "educ
Sam and Asumu, this looks like significant improvement in several ways,
thank you.
Two comments:
* There's a lot of stuff for a home page. I don't know whether this is
good or bad, but it's noticeable.
* Under "Documentation" heading, the subheadings are confusing, IMHO. 5
of the manuals
Thanks, Ryan. And thanks for the earlier reminder for me to test the
pre-release; I was distracted with other work, and probably would've
missed this pre-release.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Did a PostgreSQL SSL performance fix get into 5.3.6 pre-release in some
form?
In the pre-release I just downloaded, I don't see Ryan's original fix to
"collects/db/private/postgresql/connection.rkt".
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Matthew Flatt wrote at 07/13/2013 02:56 PM:
Others seem
overwhelmed by the details, unsure of how it will all work out, and
disconcerted by conflicting messages from others who seem to
understand the issues.
BTW, I don't know whether I'm involved in anyone being disconcerted. If
I am, please
Carl Eastlund wrote at 06/18/2013 01:36 PM:
I don't understand why version control systems don't take
directories and renames more seriously, because this stuff is part of
the development cycle and should be recorded like any other change.
This doesn't help, but... I think the reason is that
Matthew Flatt wrote at 06/18/2013 07:59 AM:
In principle, you should add a versioned dependency on "racket" to
indicate that the package does not work with version 5.3.4, and so
users of v5.3.4 should get an earlier revision of the package.
Just a general comment... For production use, I try no
Laurent wrote at 06/07/2013 02:12 AM:
What I'd really like, for the sake of flexibility / ease of use, is to
have no explicit keyword argument, but all arguments are implicit
ones, so
that you can call a function by mixing by position and by name as you
like,
without having specified so in th
I've been hesitant to comment on any of this, for three reasons: (1)
I've read the new package system documentation on at least 3 separate
occasions, and -- perhaps because I'm biased by having already formed
some ideas about where I'd like things to go -- I've had trouble
understanding the rat
Asumu Takikawa wrote at 06/08/2013 05:26 PM:
(maybe you can port paredit by replacing the emacs text buffer
manipulation function calls with method calls into these interfaces)
If you wanted to make it even more cool... One of the original goals of
Guile (a Scheme implementation that was
Mayank, paredit-like features for DrRacket would be good. You might
also want to look at some similar work from around the same time as
paredit was created: http://cs.brown.edu/research/plt/software/divascheme/
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-la
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote at 05/20/2013 11:20 PM:
I also think that git submodules are a bad idea for packages. One git
repo per package is more simple and less problematic.
Do people expect to often do commits involving changes across these
package boundaries? If so, would anoth
I'm calling for making Racket and package source transparently
accessible, even though not actually bundled into distribution downloads...
Racket has a research and education bent, and also attracts some of the
more sophisticated developers. For all of these audiences, there's a
tradition of
Matthew Flatt wrote at 04/17/2013 10:39 AM:
It would be great if we could normalize every path
to a canonical form, but path normalization in general seems to
intractable due to the possibilities of soft links, hard links,
multiple mount points, case-sensitivity choices, and probably other
twists
On these out-of-memory conditions, you might want to look at the kernel
logs for what the OOM-killer said about what processes were running,
their sizes, and who it thought the culprit was.
If the OOM logs show GB of virtual memory missing, but not used by any
userspace process, you might want
Jay McCarthy wrote at 12/10/2012 02:22 PM:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Neil Van Dyke <mailto:n...@neilvandyke.org>> wrote:
* I'm very concerned about discarding support for mixing versions
of packages. PLaneT 1 didn't fully nail this, but I suspect
My biggest comments on planet2...
* I like the general ideas of permitting more decentralized sharing of
packages (such as through some kind of Git URLs).
* I like the idea of making it easier to modify the source of a package
and share changes with upstream (which is needlessly cumbersome wi
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 11/05/2012 10:14 PM:
* racket/base (for scripting)
* racket (for programming)
After thinking about it, I think I see what you mean with the
distinction between ``for scripting'' and ``for programming''. But I
think this might be confusing.
(Expl
John Clements wrote at 10/16/2012 04:51 PM:
Data point: I have no idea what define/match does, and the name by itself does
nothing to enlighten me.
Another data point: If "define/match" expands to a "define" of a
procedure that dispatches to a set of implementations based on a
pattern-ma
could be a regression from 5.2.1 to 5.2.
5.2.1 to 5.3
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 10/09/2012 05:20 PM:
The other day, I was reproducibly crashing fresh DrRacket 5.3
processes by invoking the Macro Stepper on a particular file. (Not a
seg fault; Linux out-of-memory killer would kill it after it
The other day, I was reproducibly crashing fresh DrRacket 5.3 processes
by invoking the Macro Stepper on a particular file. (Not a seg fault;
Linux out-of-memory killer would kill it after it got to close to 3GB
RAM usage, since I don't use swap space.)
By commenting-out macro uses, I was abl
Thanks, Doug. From talking with a few people, it sounds like 5.3 is
shaping up pretty normally for a release, and the releases have been
high-quality.
I was just a little spooked by running into two bugs very quickly (two
points determine a line, after all), but I haven't found any since thos
FWIW, I just tested 16 or so additional PLaneT packages in DrRacket 5.3
pre-release, and no problems.
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 07/28/2012 02:56 PM:
Regarding Racket 5.3, I am more cautious than I recall being about a
previous Racket minor version release.
The information I have so far is mixed
Regarding Racket 5.3, I am more cautious than I recall being about a
previous Racket minor version release.
The information I have so far is mixed, rather that overwhelmingly
reassuring.
If anyone has comments on their sense of 5.3 reliability at this point,
that might help me.
Some good n
Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release.
I haven't yet found a simpler test case, but you can reproduce by
installing a particular PLaneT package as shown below.
The line 1275 it's complaining about is the following, which starts a
procedure definition that
Matthew Flatt wrote at 07/26/2012 06:36 PM:
I've pushed a repair. Thanks for the report!
Thanks, Matthew. Today, I plan to run a large pile of code through the
20120727 pre-release.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
This version :2:0 is a better test case than :1:1 :
#lang racket/base
(require (planet neil/html-template:2:=0))
(html-template (hr (@ (clear "all") (id "foo"
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 07/26/2012 05:33 PM:
Definitely looks like a Racket bug (or really broken hardwar
s right now; hopefully other people can
reproduce based on this info.
Neil V.
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 07/26/2012 05:18 PM:
Anyone know offhand why this error with 5.3 pre-release from yesterday?
UNKNOWN: : read (compiled): ill-formed code [./../src/validate.c:1573]
context...:
/usr/local/r
Anyone know offhand why this error with 5.3 pre-release from yesterday?
UNKNOWN: : read (compiled): ill-formed code [./../src/validate.c:1573]
context...:
/usr/local/racket-5.2.900.1-20120725/lib/racket/collects/racket/private/map.rkt:53:19:
loop
/home/user/.racket/planet/300/5.2.900.1
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 07/20/2012 07:44 AM:
Shouldn't everyone try to eat PLaneT brand dog food? (Not subsist off of
Git brand dog treats.)
Whether or not that's the case in general, in 5.2.1 you can do:
(require combinator-parser)
which can't be replicated with a PLaneT packa
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 07/20/2012 07:44 AM:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Shouldn't everyone try to eat PLaneT brand dog food? (Not subsist off of
Git brand dog treats.)
Whether or not that's the case in general, in 5.2.1 you can do:
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 07/20/2012 07:23 AM:
I was thinking that it'd be more appropriate to put the
'parser-combinator' and 'tex2page' packages under such an account rather
than under mine.
Note that it's probably easier for people who need these packages to
use them from GitHub with
I spent some time working with taxonomies and ontologies, and switched
to generally preferring that the permanent names for things be in a flat
namespace, and that any organizations (e.g., hierarchical) be separate,
indirect, and more fluid.
One possible exception is when there is a strong, ex
If someone has a good reason to get rid of
"this-expression-source-directory", I'm mostly indifferent.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Robby Findler wrote at 07/10/2012 05:20 PM:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
- mzlib [...]
- mzscheme [...]
I don't think these should be removed or deprecated, ever. I have lots
of code that still refers to them --- I doubt that I'm alone --- and I
think we sh
John Clements wrote at 06/20/2012 10:48 PM:
When I'm using online check syntax, I often look at the lines leaving
an identifier and wonder: is that just one line, or are there two or
three? When lines overlap, there's no easy way to tell. This can be
important in refactoring decisions, or in de
Eli Barzilay wrote at 06/20/2012 01:07 PM:
Performance-wise, for exceptions involving paths, if resolving a
complete path happens to be expensive...
(One of the nice things about errors is that performance is usually
not an issue...)
But sometimes is, such as doing something performa
Eli Barzilay wrote at 06/19/2012 08:11 PM:
* There's a whole range of tools that work with the usual
"file:line:vol: message" per line format -- Emacs compilation
buffer, the on-line-check-syntax-like error highlighting, log
parsers, etc. (The emacs on-line checking is somethin
Thanks, Matthew! I really like this. (And I know it was a lot of work
to wrangle the HTML and CSS in this case.)
It looks good to me as it is, although Robby's suggestion of lowercase
sounds good too.
Neil V.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/
Eli Barzilay wrote at 05/29/2012 07:17 AM:
I have made a possibly useful improvement to the JS search code.
It's not pushed, yet, but I dropped the revised JS code on the
pre-built pages so you can try it out here:
http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/search/
[...]
Eli, looks like a not
Asumu Takikawa wrote at 05/09/2012 06:13 PM:
Any thoughts or suggestions?
When you say "dictionaries, sequences,", are you including the Racket
types hash, vector, and list?
If so, would current performance for those Racket types be affected?
And does this have implications for what op
Laurent wrote at 05/09/2012 06:55 AM:
* Line-width
In GEdit, there's an option to show a thin vertical line at 80 chars
(modifiable number).
I find it of great help to avoid writing long lines, which I tend to
not do otherwise or often (inconveniently) look at the column number
to see where I
Marijn wrote at 05/07/2012 10:54 AM:
How about prefixing a tilda (~) instead of "current-"? It looks like a
current ;P and also like a snake (parameters could be thought to
``snake'' through the code). Alternatively the at-sign (@) to
represent currentness. To make them stand out more (if that is
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 05/04/2012 10:41 AM:
On May 4, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Laurent wrote
An interesting idea would be to count the number of times each identifier is
used in the sources, and see how many characters would be saved by using
different conventions.
That sounds like a fan
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 05/03/2012 10:57 PM:
I don't think Eli is proposing an elimination of the old names but
supplementing the code base with new ones.
I am in favor -- Matthias
Would be good to have a shorter naming convention for all parameters.
The "current-" prefix is not short,
Eli Barzilay wrote at 05/03/2012 03:48 PM:
(parameterize ([stderr (stdout)])
...)
I'm not sure how I feel about shortening these, but an additional
consideration is that a naming convention for parameters (so far,
prefixing with "current-") has been useful. I think a naming conve
One opinion: I appreciate the diligence and caution. That Racket's
releases are high quality is one of the attractions of the platform. I
can wait a few more months for submodules.
Neil V.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-
FWIW...
* I have no strong opinion on whether it would be worthwhile, if done in
a backward-compatible way.
* If done in a *non*-backward-compatible way, it might be a headache. I
know of systems in production with millions of lines of PLT/Racket code,
and -- although PLT/Racket have been p
How about a change to the purpose of the Languages control?
Currently, I think of the control *selecting how to determine* which
language to use. Example settings "whatever #lang says", "Beginning
Student", etc.
The control could be changed to *present the determination* (by #lang or
by som
Robby Findler wrote at 03/08/2012 08:00 PM:
I think that the issue probably does not predate Kevin's recent push
(distributed places).
If you'd like to audit the push security concerns, I'm sure that'd be welcome.
I meant that I might need to take a look at it because the example we
saw w
Probably mere coincidence, but GitHub has disclosed a security
vulnerability of their service, which was exploited to target Rails
developers and unnamed others:
https://github.com/blog/1068-public-key-security-vulnerability-and-mitigation
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 03/08/2012 06:32 PM:
Robby
Robby Findler wrote at 03/08/2012 05:45 PM:
Looks like something is trying to ssh while building the docs?
Can whoever figures this out let the list know, or email me privately?
Thanks.
If it turns out that a use of SSH made it into a *released* version of
Racket source, I might have to ta
Brian Mastenbrook wrote at 03/06/2012 03:43 PM:
On my system, DrRacket 5.2.1 opens almost 1800 files to start. The
vast majority (1376) are .zo files, and another 133 are uncompiled
.rkt files from the Racket distribution.
It gets much faster once the files are in OS caches, which helps with
Matthew Flatt wrote at 02/29/2012 11:20 AM:
So far, I haven't managed to replicate the problem on my machine. Do
you have any hints on how to configure Apache to trigger the problem or
a server that I might try?
I'm afraid I don't have that test setup or notes anymore. I do recall
it was
Timur Sufiev wrote at 02/27/2012 08:58 AM:
[...] Raw ports were wrapped with SSL successfully, but then program
has hung up between 2 last actions: sending the request to server and
reading its reply. Further investigation showed that in the course of
SSL processing the server had requested ses
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 02/17/2012 05:38 PM:
2. We keep it where it is, and don't maintain the code other than
fixing life-threating bugs. This is basically the status quo, and I
think it means people who report other, non-life-threatening bugs
should be informed that we're not maintaining
Neil Toronto wrote at 02/14/2012 03:37 PM:
Here's the deal, though. This one, even just the "lambda r." in a
circle, is pushing complexity. We've been approaching logo design too
much like language design, trying to cram as much semantic content as
possible into a small space or into the fewest
Eli Barzilay wrote at 02/12/2012 01:50 AM:
An hour ago, Michael W wrote:
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/5233/lambdarechopng.jpg
http://tmp.barzilay.org/cr.png
Yes! I think that "cr.png" has nailed the design.
"lambdarechopng.jpg" especially got my attention before, but
Eli Barzilay wrote at 02/09/2012 09:27 PM:
([2] What Neil VD said.)
It's just "Neil V." -- no social diseases.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Of these two, I like the second (plastic) one a bit better. The blue in
the glass is distracting to me.
Careful that it doesn't look too much like the new Pepsi logo, which has
its own burden:
http://blowatlife.blogspot.com/2009/02/pepsi-logo-response.html
I still like the current lambda log
Another variation, if you're thinking about cloud infrastructure today:
you could pretty easily make your own faux PLaneT server that either is
for a single app or takes the identity/profile of the app as part of the
URL the app uses to access the PLaneT server.
The faux server can be a tiny H
Daniel Farina wrote at 12/29/2011 07:59 PM:
The goal is that a program written, say, three
years ago should be able to run the same way it did when it was
written, so it's really useful to freeze all the dependencies into the
file system somehow and preserve it.
Someone else can comment on
x...@ncdy.org wrote at 12/22/2011 03:42 AM:
I opened the question on StackOverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8599844/is-it-possible-how-to-use-racket-in-c-applications
They pointed me to mailing list, so I want to know if that possible to run
racket in such embedded mode?
Yes. Se
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 12/20/2011 08:02 AM:
I wouldn't mind a second Racket site that has some of what Asumu proposes, say
Racket-fans.org
BTW, I recently registered "racket-club.{org,com}", mainly for the humor
potential. If there is a site that someone has been aching to see
happe
Eli Barzilay wrote at 12/20/2011 01:45 PM:
and there no sane way to debug it other than viewing it in all browsers.
Asumu, it seems like you're on a good track, but after you get the
layout how you like it in your browser, I don't envy you the
cross-browser testing to which Eli refers. :)
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
