2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu:
I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.
A alternative: Added the word zip to the documentation index,
link it to map and have an example where in (map list ...) is used.
Also:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.
Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
write an essay specifically aimed there?
- Step 1: use
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
jensa...@soegaard.net wrote:
2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu:
I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.
A alternative: Added the word zip to the documentation
I don't think we should add functions to TR that are not in Racket and
that are not clearly type-related (e.g., `cast`).
I also like Jens's solution better. Education vs crutches.
Vincent
At Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:39:16 -0500,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I'd add them to Typed Racket. That's
At some point TR will move on, and perhaps the time has come.
On Feb 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I don't think we should add functions to TR that are not in Racket and
that are not clearly type-related (e.g., `cast`).
I also like Jens's solution
I'd add them to Typed Racket. That's what Haskellians are most likely to
explore and when they find them, it's a good thing (tm). -- Matthias
On Feb 17, 2015, at 2:18 AM, Alexis King lexi.lam...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have a
I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.
Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
write an essay specifically aimed there?
- Step 1: use variables.
- Step 2: here are `for` loops!
;)
Robby
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:18
Yes, that's true.
Robby
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
jensa...@soegaard.net wrote:
2015-02-17 14:26 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu:
I don't think the libraries are
I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have a
(zip ...) function in racket/list that would be equivalent to (map list ...).
Users coming from a Haskell background might even find it useful to have a
zip-with function that is simply an alias for map. Admittedly,
9 matches
Mail list logo