Robby Findler writes:
> Number 2 probably changed a while back when signatures were
> introduced, I'd guess. That one is not so easy to roll back.
I specifically fixed this at some point - it may also be related to the
"namespace changes". I'll try to look at it later today, but can't make
any
On 19 Oct 2010, at 6:42:45, John Clements wrote:
> Kathy, can you confirm that the test-engine code is always happy with a value
> of #f for test~object?
Yes.
-Kathy
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo
Number 2 probably changed a while back when signatures were
introduced, I'd guess. That one is not so easy to roll back.
Robby
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> Okay, here's what seems to be broken:
>
> 1) cond, as Mike observed. This is related to the different expansion o
Okay, here's what seems to be broken:
1) cond, as Mike observed. This is related to the different expansion of cond.
2) make-foo, where foo is a user-defined structure. There's a mysterious extra
"false" that's showing up.
3) reduction of (cons 1 (cons 2 empty)) in beginner only.
4) local struct
On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:02 AM, John Clements wrote:
>
> 2) The interactive tests fail like this:
>
> given: #(struct:error-result "namespace-variable-value: test~object is not
> defined")
>
> I haven't worked on this one yet... but it looks like this is also something
> that was added this
On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:56 AM, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>>
>> Robby Findler writes:
>>
>>> How recently did the change come in that allows internal definitions
>>> all over the place? And how broken did this make the stepper?
>>
>> Pretty
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> Robby Findler writes:
>
>> How recently did the change come in that allows internal definitions
>> all over the place? And how broken did this make the stepper?
>
> Pretty broken: There are now (let () ...)s all over the place.
>
> (I'v
Robby Findler writes:
> How recently did the change come in that allows internal definitions
> all over the place? And how broken did this make the stepper?
Pretty broken: There are now (let () ...)s all over the place.
(I've sent separate e-mail to John and Matthew.)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Fri
How recently did the change come in that allows internal definitions
all over the place? And how broken did this make the stepper?
(Ie is it feasible to wait for the next release? and should we?)
Robby
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:03 AM, wrote:
> sperber has updated `master' from ddca8cd29b to fd
9 matches
Mail list logo
