On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
There is nothing you can't do with a brave heart and a disassembler.
In other words, I've
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was recently telling some people that I thought 'Ruby on Rails' was
mostly an ORM plus a set of default dispatching rules with convenient
ways of extending the defaults.
I agree, though I don't have much RoR
On Jul 28, 2011 7:26 AM, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
There is nothing you
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2011-07-26 1:20 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I don't have a lot of expertise on the ORM side, but I think Snooze
would probably be awesome and my MongoDB-backed structs may be helpful
too.
Is there a way of
On 2011-07-27 4:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
If you have a sufficiently powerful inspector, you can traverse any
structure. In principle, you can even traverse closures this way, but
no inspector with the needed power exists. See `struct-vector'.
That sounds fantastic! Especially the
On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual
framework.
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
No, `struct-vector' uses the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2011-07-27 4:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
If you have a sufficiently powerful inspector, you can traverse any
structure. In
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual
framework.
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would
I was recently telling some people that I thought 'Ruby on Rails' was
mostly an ORM plus a set of default dispatching rules with convenient
ways of extending the defaults.
I don't have a lot of expertise on the ORM side, but I think Snooze
would probably be awesome and my MongoDB-backed structs
9 matches
Mail list logo
