Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.6.0 release

+1 for the GA release! Tsz-Wo On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:46 AM Lokesh Jain wrote: > Yes, +1 for GA release. > > > On 03-Jun-2020, at 1:02 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > > > Thanks for starting the discussion thread. > > > > How about the next release of Ratis be a GA release? > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS]Ratis Thirdparty Release 0.4.0

+1 Thanks a lot for taking care this. Tsz-Wo On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:42 AM Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:57 AM Siddharth Wagle > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:22 AM Arpit Agarwal > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 2020,

Re: [Discussion] Ratis dealing with flakey I/O

Hi Clay, Thanks a lot for working on this. The approach in general looks good to me. As you mentioned, wrapping with FailSafe may make the code ugly. Also, it may be undesirable for Ratis becoming tightly coupled with FailSafe How about we do the following: (1) Refactor the code so that all

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.3.0 Ratis Thirdparty release

+1 Thanks a lot. Tsz-Wo On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:51 AM Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > > +1. > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:10 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > Sounds good! Let's get an RC rolling :) > > > > On 10/30/19 10:57 AM, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

> > On 25/10/19 3:31 am, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > > > > +1, we have made several fixes and improvements as well. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Ratis Dev, > > > &g

[DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

Hi Ratis Dev, As reported by Henrik Hegardt and Andy Wu, Ratis 0.4.0 release has a NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/lib/DefaultMetricsSystem problem. Therefore, we suggest rolling out 0.5.0 release as soon as possible. Any thought? Tsz-Wo

Re: Custom message serialization

Hi Alexey, I believe we are open to custom message serialization, especially, Ratis is designed to be highly pluggable. Indeed, it is a good time to do so since we still do not yet need worry about backward compatibility, since Ratis is still not yet GA. Recently we do see some weakness in

Re: ClassNotFoundException in Ratis

measure things? I am willing to look into this if > needed and see if I can do anything about it. > > I'm using dropwizard-metrics:4.0.5 which isn't compatible with the > current ratis-metrics implementation, and unfortunately I cannot > downgrade. I'd love to use ratis in my project

Re: ClassNotFoundException in Ratis

Hi Henrik, Thanks for reporting the problem. org.apache.ratis.metrics.MetricsReporting imports org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.lib.DefaultMetricsSystem, I guess it is causing the ClassNotFoundException. It is a bug. Do you want to file a JIRA? Tsz-Wo On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 2:23 AM Henrik Hegardt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

Thanks, Mukul for making the release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-642 was reopened. We probably should fix the NOTICE file first. Tsz-Wo On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:31 PM Ankit Singhal wrote: > > +1 > > -- Built from the source - OK > -- Hashes and Signatures[5] - OK > -- Ran

Re: Website updates

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-583 and posted a patch. Thanks. Tsz-Wo On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:48 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Sorry about that I somehow did find the asf-site-source branch earlier > when I made the website change. > > Let me file a JIRA fixing

Re: Website updates

Sorry about that I somehow did find the asf-site-source branch earlier when I made the website change. Let me file a JIRA fixing it. Tsz-Wo On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:17 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > Folks, > > In the future, please do not make changes to the asf-site branch unless > you have

[VOTE][RESULT] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

e. > > 2. Verified the Checksums. > > 3. Built from Sources. > > 4. Compiled Ozone with the 0.3.0 ratis dependency > > 5. Executed Ozone robot tests (all passed) > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Marton > > > > On 4/9/19 9:33 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > >

[VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2. The git tag to be voted upon: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.3.0rc2 The git commit hash:

[VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc1

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc1. The git tag to be voted upon: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.3.0rc1 The git commit hash:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

I am finally able to fix all problems in pom.xml, assembly xml and make_rc.sh; see RATIS-513. Please review it if you get a chance. Will roll rc1 once RATIS-513 is committed. Thanks. Tsz-Wo On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:55 AM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Thanks Anu and Arpit for the quick re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

elease-0.3.0/ratis-incubating-0.3.0/ratis-logservice > > of > > /Users/aengineer/Downloads/ratis-release-0.3.0/ratis-incubating-0.3.0/pom.xml > > does not exist > > > > Thanks > > Anu > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: &g

[VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0. The git tag to be voted upon: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.3.0rc0 The git commit hash:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

I am going to prepare a release candidate from branch-0.3. Thanks everyone! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:23 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Rajeshbabu, > > Thanks a lot for the quick response! > > Tsz-Wo > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:06 PM rajeshb...@apache.org > wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

.@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I will commit RATIS-510 Tez. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze > > >> All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we > >> need RATIS-510 (m

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

uggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are > included: > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in > my opinion. > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from b

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks. Tsz-Wo On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3 > locally, "gi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

gt; > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 > branch). > > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal > > wrote: > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk. &

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

re, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk. > > On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: > > Hi Marton, > > For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in > trunk to 0.3? > > Tsz-Wo > > On Tue, Feb 26,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

t; > Can we release branch-0.3 as is? > > > > Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master? > > > > > > Thanks, > > Marton > > > > On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We have around 8

Re: CI on pull requests

It is great, thanks for working on it! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:35 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > For those interested in using Github pull requests for code reviews, > with the help of Chris T from infra, I got a "check" working which > spawns a job on the builds.a.o Jenkins server. > >

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

https://builds.apache.org/view/Ratis/ > > > > > > m. > > > > > > On 1/8/19 12:38 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > >> Pending: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17580 > > >> > > >> HTH, folks. > > >> > > >&g

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

That's great, thank you so much, Josh. Tsz-Wo On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:49 PM Elek, Marton wrote: > > +1, please, do it. > > Thank you to manage it. > > Marton > > On 1/3/19 9:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > Please shout if there's any dissent over doing this today. > > > > If I don't hear any

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

> ... pushed master version to 0.4.0. It should be 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT. I also have pushed ratis-thirdparty version to 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT. Tsz-Wo On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:29 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Thanks everyone for supporting it! I just have created branch-0.3 and > pushed ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

1/14/18 9:22 PM, Hugo Louro wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On 11/12/18 1:29 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > >>> That is a good idea. We should try to maintain a release cad

[DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

Hi, We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release? We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote. Tsz-Wo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

+1 - Verified the signature and checksums. - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE and NOTICE in the gz and the jar files - Checked file names -- all file in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.1.0-rc1/ have "incubating". Thanks a lot, Josh! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:20

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

ess we need a rc1? Tsz-Wo On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:43 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > Thanks for the vote, Nicholas! > > On 10/10/18 10:43 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we > > run a second "mvn inst

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

+1 - verified signature/checksum - verified LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER in ratis-thirdparty-parent-0.1.0-src.tar.gz - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we run a second "mvn install" without clean. "mvn install" works again after "mvn clean". It seems not a

Re: Rolling RC for ratis-thirdparty

I just have committed RATIS-340 (Thanks. Josh for reviewing it). I think we are ready for a thirdparty release now. Tsz-Wo On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:10 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > I just have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-340 and > attached some patches. > Tsz-Wo >

Re: Rolling RC for ratis-thirdparty

I just have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-340 and attached some patches. Tsz-Wo On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 3:53 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Josh, > > Thanks for taking care ratis-thridparty. > > I found two minor problems: > - org.apache.hadoop.i

Re: Rolling RC for ratis-thirdparty

Josh, Thanks for taking care ratis-thridparty. I found two minor problems: - org.apache.hadoop.ipc.protobuf is shaded to org.apache.ratis.shaded.* but not org.apache.ratis.thirdparty.*. - ratis-thridparty needs a README.md. Let me file a JIRA. Tsz-Wo On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:59 AM Josh Elser

Re: Heads-up: RATIS-316 landed

Josh, Thanks a lot for cleaning up the pom! It becomes much easier to build ratis. Tsz-Wo On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:19 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Just a quick-heads up that you'll see some changes in master today that > change how you may do your normal development. Check out

Re: RC1: Call for vote

+1 I have verified all checksums and signatures and run some manual tests with the examples. Everything looks good. Thanks, Marton! Tsz-Wo On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Thanks for creating a new release Marton. > > +1 > Tested Ozone with

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)​

Thanks Marton. We can generate mds by "gpg --print-mds ". See also ratis/dev-support/make_rc.sh Tsz-Wo On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > I just found (thanks to RATIS-241) that the previous release provided mds > files as checksum. So I just added mds

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0)

tps://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/). I don't > think it's a blocker (but would be great to fix them long-term). > > Summary: I cancel this vote and propose to include the fix of 2,3,4,5 in rc1 > (hopefully very soon). > > But this is just my view. Plea

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0)

ntext$Key > CONTEXT_SPAN_KEY; > static {}; > } > > nvadivelu@HW12726 ~/w/t/p/o/t/dependency> javap -classpath > ".:./ratis-proto-shaded-0.1.1-alpha-SNAPSHOT.jar" > io.opencensus.trace.unsafe.ContextUtils > Compiled from "ContextUtils.java" > pub

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0)

Marton, I compared you keys in two locations below - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS - http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=on=0x78434EF460D6914B They somehow look different. They match until "Zz6JA". Do you know why? Tsz-Wo On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Elek,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0)

> The problem is because of two different definition of > io.opencensus.trace.unsafe.ContextUtils class present in the classpath. The > reason for having two different definition of ContextUtils in classpath is > due to the fact that we are shading/relocating io.grpc and not io.opencensus.

Re: 0.2.0 release?

ed to get . > Patch Available --> I think it should be fixed in different location with > fixing the error handling of the arithmetic state machine > > RATIS-218 Optimize heartbeating in Ratis for Grpc protocol > --> Reviewed, response is pending > > > Marton > >

Re: [VOTE#2] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

+1 The web site looks good. Thanks! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > +1 > > -Mukul > > On 16/01/18, 10:56 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote: > > +1 > > On 1/15/18, 10:04 AM, "anu engineer"

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2-alpha release

t; > I propose to wait for the merge of these tasks and create a 0.2.0 release > after that. > > I would be happy to go through on the mechanical part of releasing process > (and document all the required steps for the next releases) > > Marton > > > > > On 10/12/2017

Re: ratis web page

/Apache projects that you can use that will make it >>> easier and >>> > more consistent with other projects. >>> > >>> > I am not sure I follow the reason to have this in a google doc. >>> Why not use >>> > html/markdown with Git alone. Yo

Re: Infra request for jira workflow + Yetus

That's great. Thanks! Nicholas On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > FYI, I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15384 > > Enis

[DISCUSS] 0.2-alpha release

It has been more than 4 months after the 0.1-alpha release. After that, we have some API change (introducing RaftGroup) and a few bug fixes. How about we roll a 0.2-alpha release? Tsz-Wo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0

With four +1's and no -1, the VOTE is passed. +1 from Jing, Jitendra, Jakob and me. I will start another vote for the IPMC. Thanks everyone! Tsz-Wo On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a friendly reminder that the VOTE will be closed soon

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0

Just a friendly reminder that the VOTE will be closed soon. Please cast your vote if you haven't. Thanks. Tsz-Wo On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0

>> Downloaded the tar ball, verified the signatures. >> >> +1 >> >> On 5/3/17, 11:29 AM, "Jing Zhao" <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> +1. Thanks for driving this, Nicholas! >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:51 PM, T

[VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0. The git tag to be voted upon: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.1.0-alpha The git commit hash:

Re: Maven Build

Hi Karl, No, we have not yet decided how to distribute the site. The pom files were initially copied from Hadoop/HBase. Please free feel to suggest any changes. BTW, thanks a lot for your contributions on Ratis maven build! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: Do shading as a last step?

I am open to change the shading procedure but I like to understand the motivation. First of all, what is the problem we try to solve? Is it to avoid the imports from org.apache.ratis.shaded packages in our source code? #3 sounds like a good idea. But why we need to kick out ratis-hadoop? I

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release

> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via >> CBlock >> > and Ozone. >> > --Anu >> > >> > >> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >Hi, >>

Re: incubator-ratis git commit: Update version to 0.11-SNAPSHOT.

No problem. I will start an email thread for our release plan. Nicholas On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. > > Enis > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sur

Re: incubator-ratis git commit: Update version to 0.11-SNAPSHOT.

Not sure why it will conflict since snapshot > deployment is a standard for maven. > > We want the first release of ratis to be 0.1, not 0.11, so I will say we > have to undo this. > > Enis > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I