How about the versioning? Should we start with 0.1-alpha or 0.1.0-alpha? The latter seems better.
Tsz-Wo On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release >> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable. >> >> Enis >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via >> CBlock >> > and Ozone. >> > --Anu >> > >> > >> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >Hi, >> > > >> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can >> > >start integrating ratis. One example is HDFS-11519. >> > > >> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability. We >> > >should add such warning in the README. What do you think? >> > > >> > >Tsz-Wo >> > > >> > >> > >>
