-原始邮件-
发件人: Mad 1094592...@qq.com.INVALID
发送时间: 2021-12-24 14:27:27 (星期五)
收件人: dev
抄送:
主题: [DISCUSS] RIP-27 Auto Batch In Producer
Hello RocketMQ Community:
RIP-26 has prepared to implement batchConsumeQueue, but the
message needs to be packaged manually on the client
+1
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are
+1
I checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
-1, Cancel the vote, because there is a test case that fails in some scenarios,
I will restart the vote ASAP.
-原始邮件-
发件人: jinrongtong
发送时间: 2020-06-11 12:30:35 (星期四)
收件人: dev@rocketmq.apache.org
抄送:
主题: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.1 RC1
Hello RocketMQ Community,
+1,
I checked
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
- Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
- License and Notice are correct in source package.
- License and Notice are correct in
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 4.6.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release made some enhancements, such as refactoring the logic of updating
consume offset for pull consumer, using IPv4 first when choosing local IP, etc.
This release also fixed some issues about pull consume,
Hello RocketMQ Community,
Apache RocketMQ team is about to release Apache RocketMQ 4.6.1 and we will stop
merge PR.
If your PR has not been merged and needs further attention, please reply to
this email and we will review it as soon as possible.
Best Regards,
Apache RocketMQ Team.
+1, I checked
[ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
[ OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[ OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
ShannonDing 写道：
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>
>
> This
+1, I checked
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
ShannonDing 写道：
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for version 1.2.4 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/1.2.4-rc1/
>
+1, I checked
1. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
2. Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. 2019-11-13
20:32:34>ShannonDing 写道：
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for the 2.0.4 release of Apache rocketmq-spring
The artifacts:
+12019-11-13 20:32:34>ShannonDing 写道：
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for the 2.0.4 release of Apache rocketmq-spring
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.0.4-rc1/
The staging repo:
+1, I have checked
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current
+1
"heng du" 写道：
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the kickoff of RIP-15 RocketMQ IPv6 Support Project
>
> With the large scale application of IPV6 network, RocketMQ's support for
> ipv6 become more and more critical, .but up to now, RocketMQ does not
> support running in an
hello，我也来说一下针对其中两个问题我的想法。
春龙的第一个加锁同意他的看法。他说的这两个synchronized之间并没有看出需要串行的理由。
14 matches
Mail list logo
