duhenglucky commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526465219
@jimgreen2013 yep, RocketMQ 4.3.0 version changed the default "TBW102"
value, this will lead to some compatibility issues and it is recommended
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526454166
hi~ @RongtongJin @vongosling @duhenglucky
thanks for your help~ I have do some tests
Here is the result:
### test case1
* br
jimgreen2013 commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526454166
hi~ @RongtongJin @vongosling @duhenglucky
thanks for your help~ I have do some tests
Here is the result:
### test case1
* broker ve
RongtongJin commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526444783
hi~ @jimgreen2013
1. As far as I know, if broker does not set `autoCreateTopicEnable = true`,
the new modification will still return `No rou
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see wh
duhenglucky merged pull request #8: Add pull consumer interface and polished
Admin interface
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-ons/pull/8
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
jimgreen2013 commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526440358
hi~ @RongtongJin
your code have been merged to branch develop, i'd like to test your
improvement with client version 4.3.0 and see what will
ShannonDing commented on issue #129: [ISSUE #103] support resolvePlaceholders
for selectorExpression
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/pull/129#issuecomment-526436220
Ref ISSUE #103
This is an automated message
duhenglucky opened a new pull request #137: Upgrade rocketmq dependency to 4.5.2
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/pull/137
## What is the purpose of the change
X
## Brief changelog
XX
## Verifying this change
Follow this checkl
ShannonDing commented on a change in pull request #181: [ISSUE #180]add tag
filter example.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/pull/181#discussion_r319336000
##
File path: consumer/consumer.go
##
@@ -799,10 +799,10 @@ func (dc *defaultConsumer) processPullRe
ShannonDing commented on a change in pull request #181: [ISSUE #180]add tag
filter example.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/pull/181#discussion_r319336000
##
File path: consumer/consumer.go
##
@@ -799,10 +799,10 @@ func (dc *defaultConsumer) processPullRe
chinaTLJ commented on issue #135: on right,in Maven projects,some dependencies
is red
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/135#issuecomment-526428315
就是下了这个项目，
coveralls edited a comment on issue #1431: Fix thread unsafe issue in
`ConsumerFilterManager`
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1431#issuecomment-526423931
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25435516)
Coverage
+1
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 19:40, ShannonDing wrote:
>
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for version 1.2.3 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
>
>
>
>
> This release included main futures below:
>
> Support transaction message.
> Support C style batch message sending.
> Support get
RongtongJin commented on issue #135: on right,in Maven projects,some
dependencies is red
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/135#issuecomment-526423921
Could you please descript this question more detail? What are the
dependencies you can't pull?
coveralls commented on issue #1431: Fix thread unsafe issue in
`ConsumerFilterManager`
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1431#issuecomment-526423931
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25435358)
Coverage increas
zongtanghu commented on issue #1430: [ISSUE#1429]Update Broker's Topic Read or
Write Perm failed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1430#issuecomment-526415472
Hi @duhengforever,@ShannonDing, please help to review this pr.
coveralls commented on issue #1424: optimize code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1424#issuecomment-526234875
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25423581)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 50.463% when pulli
aftersss opened a new pull request #1431: Fix thread unsafe issue in
`ConsumerFilterManager`
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1431
`ConsumerFilterManager` is not thread safe:
`ConsumerFilterManager.clean` may remove entry of filterDataByTopic, when
this occur, the following
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for version 1.2.3 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
This release included main futures below:
Support transaction message.
Support C style batch message sending.
Support getting error information when C API returns false.
Polish the TCP transport layer.
vongosling commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526143660
I will pin this issue util someone gives us some feedback for this
improvement. Details see https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1415
---
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526080981
hi~ @duhenglucky
i am new to rocketmq. RocketMQ is cool and become more and more popular, so
i'd like to help you guys to make the *q
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526080981
hi~ @duhenglucky
i am new to rocketmq. RocketMQ is cool and become more and more popular, so
i'd like to help you guys to make the *q
coveralls commented on issue #1430: [ISSUE#1429]Update Broker's Topic Read or
Write Perm failed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1430#issuecomment-526103615
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25416705)
Covera
Build Update for zongtanghu/rocketmq
-
Build: #109
Status: Still Failing
Duration: 16 mins and 18 secs
Commit: db77463 (update_topic_perm_failed)
Author: huzongtang
Message: [ISSUE#1429]Update Broker's Topic Read or Write Perm failed.
View the changeset:
http
zongtanghu commented on issue #1377: wipeWritePerm not take effect
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1377#issuecomment-526096198
You can look at this pr(https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1430).This
pr will resolve your issue.
-
duhenglucky commented on issue #1429: Update Broker's Topic Read or Write Perm
failed
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1429#issuecomment-526096224
repeat with this [issue](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1377)
duhenglucky closed issue #1429: Update Broker's Topic Read or Write Perm failed
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1429
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
zongtanghu commented on issue #1429: Update Broker's Topic Read or Write Perm
failed
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1429#issuecomment-526095622
This issue will be resolve by this
pr(https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1430)
-
zongtanghu opened a new pull request #1430: [ISSUE#1429]Update Broker's Topic
Read or Write Perm failed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1430
## What is the purpose of the change
This pr will resolve the issue that updating broker's topic reading or
writing perm fails.
zongtanghu edited a comment on issue #1279: why nameserver not have acl ?
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1279#issuecomment-526089315
> when sometime I need nameserver expose outside network , but without acl
feature,that mean anyone can add un safe broker to rocketmq ?
>
zongtanghu commented on issue #1279: why nameserver not have acl ?
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1279#issuecomment-526089315
> when sometime I need nameserver expose outside network , but without acl
feature,that mean anyone can add un safe broker to rocketmq ?
>
>
Build Update for zongtanghu/rocketmq
-
Build: #107
Status: Still Failing
Duration: 14 mins and 43 secs
Commit: 74ffae6 (develop)
Author: King
Message: [ISSUE 504] Polish 'No route info of this topic' exception (#1415)
* Polish 'no route info of this topic' exc
Build Update for zongtanghu/rocketmq
-
Build: #108
Status: Failed
Duration: 14 mins and 1 sec
Commit: 74ffae6 (update_topic_perm_failed)
Author: King
Message: [ISSUE 504] Polish 'No route info of this topic' exception (#1415)
* Polish 'no route info of this to
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526080981
hi~ @duhenglucky
i am new to rocketmq. RocketMQ is cool and become more and more popular, so
i'd like to help you guys to make the *q
jimgreen2013 edited a comment on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526080981
hi~ @duhenglucky
i am new to rocketmq and i'd like to help you guys to make the *quick start*
more friendly to newbies like me. If th
jimgreen2013 commented on issue #504: No route info of this topic problem
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/504#issuecomment-526080981
hi~ @duhenglucky
i am new to rocketmq and i'd like to help you guys to make the *quick start*
more friendly to newbies like me. If there are
zongtanghu commented on issue #1379: ACL exist a bug
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1379#issuecomment-526075624
And also I will report the useful information for acl config length limite
issue.
This is an auto
zongtanghu commented on issue #1379: ACL exist a bug
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1379#issuecomment-526075328
You can change your acl's accessKey to more than 6 length. @lance12138
This is an automated messa
zongtanghu opened a new issue #1429: Update Broker's Topic Read or Write Perm
failed
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1429
**BUG REPORT**
1. Please describe the issue you observed:
User use UpdateTopicPermSubCommand command to update broker's topic read or
write per
coveralls commented on issue #1427: Fix offset maybe lost problem.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1427#issuecomment-526060334
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25414660)
Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 50.506
Shellbye commented on issue #1409: rocketmq tools queryMsgByKey may have bug！
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1409#issuecomment-526059767
@zongtanghu My problem is solved, but not the original.
This is an automa
zongtanghu commented on issue #1409: rocketmq tools queryMsgByKey may have bug！
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1409#issuecomment-526059047
@Shellbye You can compare the tools.yml file to plain_acl.yml file.The admin
accessKey and secretKey must be the same value.
--
coveralls commented on issue #1428: Correct Topic permission when broker has
permission.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/1428#issuecomment-526056534
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/25414534)
Coverage decre
duhenglucky commented on issue #1409: rocketmq tools queryMsgByKey may have bug！
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1409#issuecomment-526055853
@Shellbye ok, I will reopen this issue, @zongtanghu could you help this guy
to resolve this issue?
---
honglouleiyan opened a new issue #1409: rocketmq tools queryMsgByKey may have
bug！
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/1409
when I close acl(aclEnable=false), execute the command:sh mqadmin
queryMsgByKey -n 127.0.0.1:9876 -t topicH -k 12345678 ,I am able to get the
correct resu
51 matches
Mail list logo
