Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/20
@shroman It seems that last cleaning, for too long-time no-resolved prs,
included this one.
If you feel it is necessary to reopen this PR, please feel free to do it.
you may
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/133#discussion_r140402297
--- Diff:
store/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/CleanCommitLogServiceTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/138#discussion_r140401564
--- Diff:
client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/producer/selector/SelectMessageQueueByConsistentHash.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,132
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/142
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vsair @Jaskey please help do a review?
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/143
@lizhanhui This purge is not be safe for scheduled message.
---
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/143#discussion_r140139906
--- Diff:
store/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/DefaultMessageStore.java ---
@@ -1392,6 +1397,14 @@ public void run
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/143#discussion_r140139302
--- Diff: common/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/UtilAllTest.java
---
@@ -89,6 +89,14 @@ public void
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/146#discussion_r140138721
--- Diff:
store/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/ConsumeQueueTest.java ---
@@ -131,6 +130,65 @@ protected void putMsg
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/147
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vongosling any view?
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/148
@mark800 IMO, it is easy to add unit test for such change.
just test if the return value of computNextHourTimeMillis(and other
methods) is expected.
I will merge this PR
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/149
@zhouxinyu @vongosling any idea about this?
---
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/149#discussion_r140136764
--- Diff:
client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/producer/selector/SelectMessageQueueByConsistentHash.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,94
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/152
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/153
@evthoriz may you mock a test for this scenario?
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/154
@zwillim I want to merge this PR. Could you please change the target branch
to apache:develop ?
As all the PRs are merged into develop at first.
---
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/156#discussion_r139868962
--- Diff:
broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/ServerTracerTimeUtil.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/156#discussion_r139869169
--- Diff:
broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/mqtrace/TrackerTimeSendMessageHook.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,62
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/156
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/165
@wenweihu86 By default, the commitlog will flush in real-time. If enable
flushCommitLogTimed, then it will flush at the interval.
So there is no need to sleep 100 ms, 10
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/167
@warning5 this pr has no files changed.
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/28
@lizhanhui LGTM. Version 4.2.0 is going to be released now. It will be
nice to contain this feature. Could you please add one IT Test to maintain the
quality?
---
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/20
@shroman could you please resolve the conflicts?
IMO, the return value of flush() and commit(), means whether there is data
left to be flushed or committed, that is OK
Nice to see a CPP client, and its performance is impressive.
It will be great if other clients also provides such test results.
2017-09-05 10:30 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling :
> Hi wangqiwei,
>
>
> Thanks for your contribution. Looking forward to your on-going maintenance
> of
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/158#discussion_r135689337
--- Diff:
broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/BrokerStartup.java ---
@@ -257,4 +268,28 @@ public static Options
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/157#discussion_r135681743
--- Diff: common/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/MixAllTest.java
---
@@ -93,4 +90,12 @@ public void testString2File() throws
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/146#discussion_r134941603
--- Diff:
store/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/ConsumeQueueTest.java ---
@@ -148,6 +148,52 @@ protected void deleteFile(File file
+1
Nice to see Apache RocketMQ to be TLP.
2017-08-21 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhanhui Li :
> +1
>
> Glad to see the changes we have brought about since the initiative of
> incubation and anticipate the potentials of the Apache RocketMQ as a TLP.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:05
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/126#discussion_r132427103
--- Diff:
store/src/test/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/DefaultMessageStoreTest.java ---
@@ -45,19 +47,22 @@ public void init() throws
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/118
OK. IT tests have been added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/118
@lindzh It seems lack IT tests for TLS. IMO, it needs two IT Test at
least. one for old client which dose not support TLS, one for new.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/125
@lqjack Thanks for you contribution. You may want to refactor the PR name
and attach the jira issue in the comment.
It is better to add some detailed words to the PR name
Hi all,
The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache
RocketMQ 4.1.0 (incubating).
Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low
latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and
flexible scalability.
The version
Hi all,
The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ
4.1.0 (incubating).
Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low
latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible
scalability.
The version
Hello RocketMQ Community,
The Apache RocketMQ vote is now closed and has passed with 3 binding +1s, 3
non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1:
Binding votes +1s:
Justin Mclean (jmclean)
Von Gosling (vongosling)
yukon (yukon)
Non-binding votes +1s:
liuxue (vsair)
wenfeng wang
Jaskey Lam
A vote on
Hello RocketMQ Community,
It is a pleasure to call a vote for releasing 4.1.0-incubating of Apache
RocketMQ.
This version has features of batch message, message filtering based on SQL92,
log appender, implementation of the OpenMessaging specification 0.1.0-alpha
version, etc.
The
Github user dongeforever closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
the client module and its dependencies should be compatible with 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
[ROCKETMQ-220]Add IT test for Filter By SQL 92
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-220
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112
[ROCKETMQ-219] Add batch example
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-219
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/110
@Jaskey This PR has been merged and will be released in 4.1.0. Thanks a lot
for your work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/14
+1 Nice
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/110
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
@Jaskey Yeah. it has been merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/59
+1. This PR has been merged. @djKooks you may want to close it now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/101
@lindzh this PR is merged. You may close this PR now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/103
@lizhanhui It seems that this PR had not been merged. I will handle this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/97
@lindzh This is PR is merged. you may close this PR now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/93
LGTM, I will merge this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/105
@zhouxinyu @lizhanhui it is time to merge this PR now, could you please
have a double check?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/34
@wu-sheng this PR has been merged. you may close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/3
@shroman please resolve the conflicts and merge this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/92
@zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
LGTM @zhouxinyu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/98
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/99
@liumian97 could you please follow the apache way of PR: create issue and
rename pull request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/104
IMO. if using trim, it is better to trim in all related places
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/104
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/105
LGTM @zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongeforever closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/40
It seems good. And maybe the name(suffixed with V2) could be polished.
And maybe different ack mode should support orderly consuming too.
---
If your project is set up
> > > 2. Create separate git repos for various sub projects, it's feasible as
> > > Bruce said. But this way may bring extra management and delivery costs.
> > >
> > >
> > > IMO, we should decide a way as soon as possible, and I insist that the
> > > first way m
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
@shroman In runbroker.sh and runserver.sh, some default options, such as
-Xmx8g, are placed after the JVM_OPTS, so user-defined -Xmx will not take
effect.
And if we put
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/96
The PR is better not to be merged by the original author.
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu @shroman please help merge this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Cool. Thank liuxue's work on documentation, this could be a good example for
new features.
-- Original --
From: "liuxue";;
Date: Wed, May 3, 2017 08:55 PM
To: "dev";
Subject: RocketMQ support message
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/92
@Jaskey It may take a long time to fix the issue ROCKETMQ-94.
And we could improve it step by step.
Now one consumer startup will refresh the subscriptions, but the consumer
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/96
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu @vongosling please have a review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/96
[ROCKETMQ-187]Measure the code coverage for Integration Tests, and add
sonar-apache profile
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-187
Now we could browse the Unit
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
The intention is to make user-defined JVM flags to replace the initial
ones.
So just put JAVA_OPT_EXT after JAVA_OPT is enough.
The later defined JVM parameters will replace
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/90
@Jaskey This PR has been merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/90
LGTM +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
@shroman please help review and check it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/9
@netroby This PR has been merged. If any new PR is submitted, please notice
me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
@netroby nice. I would merge this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
@vongosling @zhouxinyu please help add the component 'rocketmq-externals'
or 'rocketmq-docker'
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
@netroby I want to merge this PR. Could you please provide your email
address that could be identified as your github account ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
@vsair @netroby Yeah. how to setup docker env is not the major work here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Hi,
Thanks for your preciseness. It impressed on me a lot.
And some polishing is done[1].
[1] https://rocketmq.apache.org/the-correct-posture-of-submitting-pull-request/
Regards
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "Justin Mclean";<jus...@clas
Hi Justin:
No doubt that
> The correct URL is:
> git://git.apache.org/incubator-rocketmq.git
> There is a read only mirror on GitHub at:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq
"https://github.com/dongeforever; is just the forked repo, and has been
repo.
Regards
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "Justin Mclean";<jus...@classsoftware.com>;
Date: Sun, Apr 2, 2017 09:56 AM
To: "dev"<dev@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>;
Subject: Re: [Big Data] RocketMQ community-Master
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
@StyleTang Nice
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
[ROCKETMQ-161] Update runbroker.sh and runserver.sh to support user defined
jvm mem flag
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-161?filter=-1
You can merge this pull
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
Communicate With Us:
maybe add the users and dev mailing lists as a supplement
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Hi Netroby:
Maybe I describe something in a wrong way.
As blog said "fork the original repo, and clone it":
Forking the original repo is not a command, but an operation on github.com,
so it was left out.
And the https://github.com/dongeforever/incubator-rocketmq.git is t
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/6
@StyleTang maybe you could squash your commits into only single one. This
blog may help you:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/the-correct-posture-of-submitting-pull-request
polishing is welcome.
Regards
dongeforever
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/52
@shroman I have merged this PR. and I will have a review for the PR #57
later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/52
@vongosling OK. I would merge this PR. and @shroman could you help me check
the PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/57
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/52
@shroman It seems that you could merge this PR now. And according to new
branching model, it is better to merge this to the 'develop' branch
---
If your project is set up
Hi Rick??
I am testing the existed image now, and I would migrate it to
rocketmq-external repository as soon as possible. IMO, build a new one is
unnecessary, and polishing is welcome.
Regards
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "Rick
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53
this PR has been merged into develop branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Hi Von Gosling:
It seems not ok. I cannot commit to the
git://git.apache.org/incubator-rocketmq.git with
user.name=dongeforever
user.email=dongefore...@apache.org
is there anything wrong?
dongeforever
Best Regards
-- Original --
From: "Von Go
tant.
Best Regards
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "Justin Mclean";<jus...@classsoftware.com>;
Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 05:48 PM
To: "dev"<dev@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>;
Subject: Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017
Hi,
>
to reach out with any question.
Best Regards
dongeforever
Github user dongeforever commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53#discussion_r104348323
--- Diff: store/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/ConsumeQueue.java
---
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ public long getMinOffsetInQueue
+1 all external projects in one place, same repo or better the same group
As a user, I would be glad to see these integrated projects in a managed
central place and feel free to use it, otherwise I may lack confidence in the
quality.
-- Original --
From:
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/52
Thanks @shroman , it is very useful for other projects' integration tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Cool. Sorry for a time not involved in it. Now I am working on the batch
feature. After finishing it , more time will spent on this project.
Maybe we can release a early version based on the previous work, and get more
users involved in.
-- Original --
From:
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53
@Jaskey Sorry. You are right. And it is worth a new PR, maybe we can add
batch id along with a new optimized consumeOrderlyService.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/53
@Jaskey Now there is no batch id, but the messages in one batch are sent to
the same queue, and they can only be sent all successfully or all
unsuccessfully.
You could check
compile from source
It seems perfect!
Thanks.
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "yukon";<yu...@apache.org>;
Date: Sun, Feb 12, 2017 11:44 AM
To: "dev"<dev@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>;
Subject: [RESTART][VOTE][#3]: Release
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo