Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Andrew Wetmore
More than that, I think each directory should have a README file that explains the goal or intended use of that component set. On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:46 AM Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I think we should list the component sets that are not complete in a > separate list below the mention of

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Andrew Wetmore
I think we should list the component sets that are not complete in a separate list below the mention of Basic and Jewel...and MDL? I can get to that later today. Andrew On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:57 AM Hugo Ferreira wrote: > Thank you again. > It is all clear for me now :) > > C

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Hugo Ferreira
> > > > app. > > > > > > > > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about > PAYG > > > and > > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most > > needed > > > > > beads

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
; > and > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most > needed > > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is > > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express > > >

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Hugo Ferreira
eeded > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express > > have > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add > it. > > > > > > > &g

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
. For example if enabling/disable a component is > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express > have > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add it. > > > > > > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:4

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Hugo Ferreira
gt; Hi: > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here: > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets > > > > Andrew > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
() escribió: > Hi: > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here: > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets > > Andrew > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > For a while that I have

Re: Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-20 Thread Andrew Wetmore
Hi: Brief descriptions of the component set are here: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets Andrew On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira wrote: > Hi, > > For a while that I have a question to make about current components set :) > > If search for TextIn

Clarify the different component sets

2020-10-20 Thread Hugo Ferreira
Hi, For a while that I have a question to make about current components set :) If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects: - HTML5 - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core components from the framework - Express - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and

Re: Sharing Basic code with other component sets (Was Re: [Discuss] Trying to discern between High-level abstraction...)

2019-12-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, that would be cool. Jewel is not as purist as Basic in terms of PAYG and other royale concepts, and don't think it should be. While Basic is the foundation and should try to focus on that kind of concepts and is at the start of the chain, Jewel is at the end and that implies to solve

Sharing Basic code with other component sets (Was Re: [Discuss] Trying to discern between High-level abstraction...)

2019-12-24 Thread Alex Harui
Forking for this particulare topic: On 12/24/19, 6:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: ...Why I think we need to solve is if we have a better way to extend UIBase, better than StyledUIBase path, since I'm not very happy with it. The worst problem I see is that all we can do in

Re: Component Sets

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris, although we get a much better docswith the work in the latest months, there's still many missing points to cover, some with its own reserved place, but still empty, and others will need to reserve its place. As always we'll try our best to cover it as soon as possible. To be fastest we

Re: Component Sets

2019-10-08 Thread Andrew Wetmore
There is not such a document yet, no. Help creating one would be welcome. On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:22 AM Chris Velevitch wrote: > There doesn't seem to be an all-encompassing document describing, MX, > Spark and Jewel components and as well as the pros and cons of each > nor is there a

Component Sets

2019-10-08 Thread Chris Velevitch
There doesn't seem to be an all-encompassing document describing, MX, Spark and Jewel components and as well as the pros and cons of each nor is there a discussion on using third party web components, creating custom web components and how to the material design components.

Re: Component sets

2018-02-01 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
HTML too. > > > On Feb 1, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have started the help docs page about Components, which I suppose we > > should specify are UI components. > > > > Am I correct that there are three

Re: Component sets

2018-02-01 Thread Gabe Harbs
HTML too. > On Feb 1, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have started the help docs page about Components, which I suppose we > should specify are UI components. > > Am I correct that there are three component sets a user might