Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Ok Alex, I end with that change for home best, Carlos 2018-01-05 2:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > Yes, looks ok to me. > > Thanks for making the changes. > > -Alex > > On 1/4/18, 4:05 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" >

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Yes, looks ok to me. Thanks for making the changes. -Alex On 1/4/18, 4:05 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >this one is MIT:

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

I changed the second to test that sag icons (multiple target and devices) let me know if it's ok 2018-01-05 1:05 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Alex, > > this one is MIT: https://undraw.co/illustrations > > so I think this ok for us right? > > > > 2018-01-05 1:01

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi Alex, I'll see other options. In fact that part of the home was done only as something temporal and I want to replace for other material 2018-01-04 18:46 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > Carlos, > > Even if we "can" use ET-Line on the website, can we replace it now with >

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Carlos, Even if we "can" use ET-Line on the website, can we replace it now with something ALv2 compatible? That way we won't have to revisit this topic later, and I can make my mockup look more like your site, which might help me continue to keep working on Royale full-time. Please? -Alex On

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi Justin, as stated by apache legal in the ticket where we discussed the website, is perfectly legal, since our website is only a marketing tool and no something that users will download as part of Apache Royale technology that we build. In case we want to make a website build with royale and

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi, > Fonts are perfectly legal! They are available in Google Fonts! :)\ Most of the fonts used (e.g. Hind Siliguri, Open Sans Condensed, Oswald, Signika and Source Sans Pro) are available from google fonts and under either the open font license or the APv2 license so there’s no issue with

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Piotr, Fonts are perfectly legal! They are available in Google Fonts! :) I created a Release website thread to get it published ASAP let's get move on 2018-01-04 12:41 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > If fonts have incompatible license and it looks like it has, we >

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi Olaf, my global opinion always was that the website is only marketing thing. We are not releasing it as a product, and that's what apache legal said, so we should not we worried about it. We are not publishing nothing ilegal, and with things that we can't use. All is based on WP and a theme

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

2018-01-03 21:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > Great, so please help us create those parts by telling more about the > fonts and colors you are using. > Hi Alex, inside the WP admin interface, in theme options you have a font section where all of you can see what fonts

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

If fonts have incompatible license and it looks like it has, we unfortunately have to replace it by some other one. If we would like to confirm we should raise a jira for Legal. That's my thoughts. Let's move forward, because that discussion takes too long and I don't see any end. Thanks, Piotr

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

As for your questions: 1) Yes we should do as Alex suggested. We should remove, or put in that place information that it will be filled once we release things. We can put there link to the section with Nightly Build. 2) Nightly build is enough for now. Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-04 12:24 GMT+01:00

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Carlos, During past 4 weeks I have sent link to nightly build of Royale at least 20 times to several people. :) Yes for me it is worth to have website right now. I'm not sure what do you mean that people can't use Royale at all. Yes they can - I'm working every day on my examples using Nightly

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi, > Maybe you can get it here but it seems to me that licensing is not really > clear [1]. It’s reasonably clear that it's GPL as I said the other day. See [1] (see point 6 under registration) and [2] which states "As always, these icons are completely free to use, and have been released

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

> Can you tell me where I can get a free and open source > et-line font? Maybe you can get it here but it seems to me that licensing is not really clear [1]. If this is an issue, maybe we could find a replacement for the icons at font awesome? >I would appreciate your >help instead of

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

On 1/3/18, 6:50 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >I agree as well with what Olaf said. For me having parts of the Royale >website done with royale is sufficient. Great, so please help us create those

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Carlos, 2018-01-03 15:50 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira : > I agree as well with what Olaf said. For me having parts of the Royale > website done with royale is sufficient. > > @Alex, the icons in website are as well free and open source from various > icons sets out there like

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

I agree as well with what Olaf said. For me having parts of the Royale website done with royale is sufficient. @Alex, the icons in website are as well free and open source from various icons sets out there like font awesome and line icons and others. Again, nothing that you should waste your

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi, I would just like to mention that from my point of view it I would be really helpful to have a first Royale release soon, e.g. 0.9.0. After that, Royale could evolve by minor versions like 0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc. I agree with Carlos that there is still a way to go regarding missing stuff and the

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

I really like doing things and moving forward. I see only one problem in case of website which has been raised - License. If you guys figure out whether problematic stuff is ok, we should export and public that website now. There is no point to wait, building new one using Royale can always

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Hi Alex and all, And first of all Happy new year to all of you! Hope 2018 be a great year for all of you! :) 2017-12-30 8:50 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > I agree with what you say. What I am suggesting is making enough changes > to the site to attract people who can

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Couple of thoughts: 1) Should we alter what Carlos has in some way so that we can put a copy of it up on royale.a.o now and update it again after the first Royale release? I would rather have a nicer site now that has links to useful things. If a better site can bring in more folks between now

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

I also think this is a great initiative. Regarding SEO there are some optimizations that can be applied to single page apps as well so maybe it's worth testing that before we convert it to a multipage. I'm not in front of the computer but when I am I'll share the links I read, if there's interest

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

FYI, with cache enabled the page load was so fast that there was no noticeable browser redraw! I’m blown away by the performance! > On Dec 22, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Harbs wrote: > > 2. The speed that the page loaded is incredible. First draw was less than a > second and

Re: Royale and Websites (was Re: About website actual work in progress)

Some thoughts: 1. This is a great initiative! 2. The speed that the page loaded is incredible. First draw was less than a second and fully loaded was less than 2 seconds — with cache disabled. 3. Ultimately I think this is the way we want to go, but getting the polish on this right will take a