Release Step 011 Succeeded

Warning: this step requires a secret key, so it should not be performed on the CI server. It's probably best to perform it on your PC. >From the royale-asjs repo: 1. Run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_011 -Drelease.version=0.9.9 -DskipTests=true This will download the artifacts then unzip

RE: Implementing JS renderer from Royale

Do you have a concrete example? From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 1:27 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Implementing JS renderer from Royale Hi, I'm asking for guidance... Lately I'm actively using several JS

Release Step 013 Succeeded

Note: before running these steps make sure that PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME is set and that you have PlayerGlobal installed under /11.7/playerglobal.swc >From the royale-asjs repo 1. Run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_013 -Drelease.version=0.9.9 -Droyale.swc-date="2/10/22 9:06 -0800"

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

The examples are run as part of the step 11, but mvn only. The ant examples are only built after release approval. For some reason MenuExample was working in mvn but not in ant. That’s why the release steps did not fail prior to approval script. For anybody curious to find out why these

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

>Josh’s pick I meant Josh’s fix of course (being picky here). From: Yishay Weiss Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 9:12 AM To: Josh Tynjala; dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

Main Maven build on Jenkins is still failing, but I think it may not be problem on our sight, but rather something happened with our project in nightly -> https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/ - it has been removed for some reason. I think I will contact infrastructure and ask what has

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

Josh found an issue with MenuExample From: apacheroyal...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 8:35 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3 Hi, This is the vote for the 0.9.9 release of Apache

Release Step 010 Succeeded

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_010 and run the following commands: git push git push origin org.apache.royale.framework-0.9.9-rc4 You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

> The ant examples are only built after release approval. Actually, I think I misread the scripts. I don’t think examples are built with ant anywhere in the release process except upon approval. If somebody wants to inform otherwise please do. From: Yishay Weiss

RE: Implementing JS renderer from Royale

Hi Yishay, yes of course, Right now I have two cases: - DatePicker, from Mobiscroll - InspireTree JS In the DatePicker I have to customize the calendar header (our DateChooser) to put a series of options (Labels, buttons,..). This component allows me to customize the content of this header

Implementing JS renderer from Royale

Hi, I'm asking for guidance... Lately I'm actively using several JS libraries in Royale and I find myself with a recurring need: custom renderers. Depending on how the library is made there is the possibility to define the view of the component or some part of it. I would like to be able to

Release Step 012 Succeeded

Folder 0.9.9 already exists. Continue to next step.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4

Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky when I was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.9-src.tar.gz Java 17 OS: Mac OS X aarch64 12.1 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

IMO, the release does not have to be bug free. If the Maven and Ant build scripts can build the source package, there are no unintended compiled code in the source package, LICENSE and NOTICE are correct, and a few other Apache policy requirements are met, and folks can use the results of the

[VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4

Hi, This is the vote for the 0.9.9 release of Apache Royale. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/ Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at:

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4

This is the discussion thread. Thanks, Yishay Weiss

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

I agree in retrospect that an example that compiles in Maven, but not in Ant, and is not critical for users, should not hold a release. It was good to spot the regression, but ideally that should be spotted on CI. From: Alex Harui Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022