Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

OK, I have "ant all" working in royale-asjs and tried to describe how to set it up in READme. Please use the packaging branch in royale-asjs. I could just merge this into develop since the develop branch probably won't work as it currently is, or we can put more polish on the packaging in the pac

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Hi - What GitBox is is a copy of the project on GitHub. That way if something were to happen to GitHub projects would not lose their archives. Regards, Dave > On Sep 28, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Peter Ent wrote: > > Confused. My URLs point to GitHub and I don't see Alex's commits. Why is > there Git

Re: Welcome Royale Developers

Test nabble. 2017-09-27 18:41 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Thanks Piotr, > > Looks like Nabble is hooked up. Did you set up Nabble for users@ as well? > > There are currently only 3 of us subscribed to this list. Time to go tell > others to subscribe. > > -Alex > > On 9/27/17, 9:31 AM, "piotrz" wr

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

I think the Github url *should* just work. Right now, there seems to be a problem with some bot killing commits. Although, Alex’s latest commit seems to have worked… > On Sep 28, 2017, at 11:57 PM, Peter Ent wrote: > > Confused. My URLs point to GitHub and I don't see Alex's commits. Why is >

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

@Harbs: That link seemed to show a repository browser. I didn't see the URL to clone but might have missed it. @Dave: We've had some discussion with Infra. They said to see if it is still happening after a day or so. @Piotr: Yesterday it took over 2 hours before the commit was discarded. So I'

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Confused. My URLs point to GitHub and I don't see Alex's commits. Why is there GitHub and Gitbox? I copied the URLs right from a perilous email. ‹peter On 9/28/17, 3:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Alex, > >Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your origin will help? > >> On Sep 28, 2017, at

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git Although it seems to redirect now, so I’m not so sure... > On Sep 28, 2017, at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I'm using GitHub. Are there GitBox URLs? > > -Alex > > On 9/28/17, 12:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Is your origi

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

You ought to discuss any issues with Infra on HipChat. Regards, Dave > On Sep 28, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I'm using GitHub. Are there GitBox URLs? > > -Alex > > On 9/28/17, 12:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your orig

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

Just give an administrator rights. Can you check whether you have such options in your menu: [image: Obraz w treści 1] Under Application -> Manage list archive settings. Piotr 2017-09-28 22:21 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > OK, I registered. > > On 9/28/17, 11:59 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > > >W

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

But I see your last test commit. It looks like it wasn't rejected. Piotr 2017-09-28 22:22 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > I'm using GitHub. Are there GitBox URLs? > > -Alex > > On 9/28/17, 12:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your origin will hel

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

I'm using GitHub. Are there GitBox URLs? -Alex On 9/28/17, 12:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Alex, > >Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your origin will help? > >> On Sep 28, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >> Hi Erik, >> >> Actually, I have a lot of changes queued up in the

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

OK, I registered. On 9/28/17, 11:59 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Would you mind to register and I will give you Admin rights. > >Piotr > >2017-09-28 20:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hmm. Can you send me all of the info you saw when you set up the forum? >> >> Some forums take a while to proces

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Alex, Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your origin will help? > On Sep 28, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > Actually, I have a lot of changes queued up in the packaging branch for > royale-asjs. Do we know if the "hubot" is still discarding commits? My > g

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

Would you mind to register and I will give you Admin rights. Piotr 2017-09-28 20:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Hmm. Can you send me all of the info you saw when you set up the forum? > > Some forums take a while to process incoming mail and don't update > immediately. I'm going to wait and check

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

Hmm. Can you send me all of the info you saw when you set up the forum? Some forums take a while to process incoming mail and don't update immediately. I'm going to wait and check again in a couple of hours. -Alex On 9/28/17, 11:51 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >I believe it should already pic

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

I believe it should already pickup our emails, but it's not... :/ Piotr 2017-09-28 20:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > OK, I subscribed Nabble. Let's see if it picks this up. > > On 9/28/17, 9:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >Piotr, > > > >Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an

Re: Product branding

Well, if the window is short, that's a problem. GitHub is discarding commits so I'm not sure it makes sense to push a bunch of changes today. I've just pushed a test commit to see what happens. I guess I can test building without the flex-sdk repo locally today. -Alex On 9/28/17, 10:08 AM, "Eri

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

OK, I subscribed Nabble. Let's see if it picks this up. On 9/28/17, 9:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Piotr, > >Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an archive of >threads? > >If not, send me the Nabble info off list and I'll try to get it to work. > >Thanks, >-Alex > >On 9/27/1

Re: Product branding

For now, it seems convenient to do a few quick tweaks to the existing code (that uses the flex-sdk repo) to get folks like myself up and running with a working copy of Royale. Postponing having a way to set up Royale on a clean system (which mine is) makes it very difficult for new devs to join the

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

I've sent it to Harbs, but let me send it to you also. If you are moderator you can make it working. Piotr 2017-09-28 18:47 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Piotr, > > Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an archive of > threads? > > If not, send me the Nabble info off list and I'll

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

Hi - I’m curious about why we need Nabble. It’s been several years since I looked. We now have Pony Mail so what is the use case? Regards, Dave > On Sep 28, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Piotr, > > Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an archive of > threads? >

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

> > I think we all have to presume there will be bumps in the road. > I'm not complaining, don't get me wrong, I'm trying to coordinate. I think at Royale we are hoping to get a lot of folks back that left because of all the stuff going on at Flex. These folks, like me, might appreciate an easy w

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

Piotr, Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an archive of threads? If not, send me the Nabble info off list and I'll try to get it to work. Thanks, -Alex On 9/27/17, 12:11 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >I have sent emails about nabble to Harbs off list. Once he get a chance

Re: Product branding

My PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME does not point inside a flex-sdk repo. It really shouldn't. We allowed it because some folks wanted to point to an Apache Flex IDE configuration, but Apache Flex works fine when developing without an IDE by pointing PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME elsewhere. And that's safer since you won

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Hi Erik, I think we all have to presume there will be bumps in the road. You've been away from the project and probably didn't notice that I've been pushing packaging changes to a branch for the past few weeks. There was a thread on dev@flex about new packaging. There was so much email traffic

Re: Product branding

Thanks Shane. When we were discussing this earlier, we were discussing two IDE-friendly release artifacts, one designed for folks migrating from Apache Flex and another for folks not interested in SWF. In the packaging branch I have most of that working. We were discussing calling the migration

Re: Product branding

> > That path to playerglobal should not be in flex-sdk. I was talking about the path in the PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME environment variable. That must point to the Flex SDK directory, but in the current procedure in the READme, that doesn't exist yet. I'm rewriting the READme (and adding helper targets i

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

"packaging branch"? I do think some coordination (wiki?) is in order, because apparently we both spend a good deal of time on the same thing... EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > In the build.xml files, both are used. It is a separate work item to > shrink it down to o

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Well, some double work never hurts... Oh, wait :-( How do we coordinate this in the future? EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Erik, > > Actually, I have a lot of changes queued up in the packaging branch for > royale-asjs. Do we know if the "hubot" is still discard

Re: Product branding

That path to playerglobal should not be in flex-sdk. It could point to an IDE package of Apache Flex though. On 9/28/17, 3:48 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Nope, I'm still in the READme of the asjs repo, I'm trying to understand >and fix the circular dependencies in that document... > >E.g. in th

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Hi Erik, Actually, I have a lot of changes queued up in the packaging branch for royale-asjs. Do we know if the "hubot" is still discarding commits? My goal for today was to get the Ant builds working on apacheflexbuilds CI server. Thanks, -Alex On 9/28/17, 5:27 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

In the build.xml files, both are used. It is a separate work item to shrink it down to one variable. And a separate work item to rename everything. Until it is safe to push changes, you can use the packaging branch in royale-asjs and apply the commits I pushed yesterday and see if you can get th

RE: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

My guess is that neither is obsolete as both of them reside in royale-compiler. Maybe we just need to rename them to COMPILER_SWF_HOME and COMPILER_JS_HOME. But my compiler knowledge isn’t great so I’d wait for more educated answers. From: Erik de Bruin Sent: Thurs

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

I understand, but I first want to get stuff running on my machine and I'm using that effort to update the READme, as it currently doesn't have a consistent procedure to get things working. The renaming will have to be done at a later stage, carefully, as these global vars probably pop up in the we

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

To be coherent with what we are doing in always thinking in new users I will talk about "ROYALE_HOME" Moreover taking into account that we killed falcon codename (the repo is now "royale-compiler") 2017-09-28 15:45 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Hi Erik, > > Actually I'm always using FALCON_HOME. I

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

Hi Erik, Actually I'm always using FALCON_HOME. IDE like Moonshine is also looking into that environment variables. Not sure whether we need the second one, but maybe Alex will shed some light. Piotr 2017-09-28 15:41 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin : > Hi, > > I'm confused (again) ;-) > > There used to

FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

Hi, I'm confused (again) ;-) There used to be (way back when I knew about this stuff) two 'parts' to the compiler. Now there is only one repo... The documentation (READme) has info about two env vars - FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME - you can set if you install the 'parts' of the compiler in non-

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Ahh Yes! I'm sorry about confusion. Just heading to my corner in silence :) Good Luck Erik and really happy that you get back to us! :) Piotr 2017-09-28 14:05 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin : > I think Alex' changes were to the compiler build? > > EdB > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Piotr Zar

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

I think Alex' changes were to the compiler build? EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > No problem Erik! I will take over the Maven build once I get a chance. Btw. > I thought Alex did some fixes lately and push some fixes for Ant build, but > didn't follow what was the

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

No problem Erik! I will take over the Maven build once I get a chance. Btw. I thought Alex did some fixes lately and push some fixes for Ant build, but didn't follow what was the changes. Just need to be reviewed once we start making renaming to Royale. :) Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-28 13:59 GMT+02:00

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

I tried Maven when it came up for FlexJS years ago. I can't wrap my head around it's concepts and don't want to invest the time to learn it as an alternate build system, I'm afraid. I'll leave the Maven stuff for someone else. I'm doing the Ant work on a branch that I'll publish once I think I'm d

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Erik, Would it be possible setup yourself also in Maven? It would be awesome have more people who have both setups ready. Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-28 13:50 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin : > Hi, > > Just to avoid confusion and possible collisions: I'm working on fixing > 'build.xml'. I got pulled into it

Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Hi, Just to avoid confusion and possible collisions: I'm working on fixing 'build.xml'. I got pulled into it because I'm trying to get back in a dev mode, but the READme is confusion and inconsistent. This led me to start fixing it, which then put me squarely in 'build.xml'. First I'll change the

Re: Product branding

Nope, I'm still in the READme of the asjs repo, I'm trying to understand and fix the circular dependencies in that document... E.g. in the prerequisites you are supposed to download the playerglobal.swc and put it in a folder that is only referenced by a relative path... I happen to understand tha

Re: Product branding

Erik, Are you going to work on changes in Wiki, that's what are you going to do ? Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-28 11:54 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin : > Hi, > > I'm trying to get back in the game and that makes me read a lot of the > documentation. Obviously all of it currently refers to Apache FlexJS. > >

Re: Product branding

The ASF has a policy for general branding: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#websites And a guide for how others should refer to Apache products and projects (mainly focused at various companies who try to abuse our brands): https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/guide So in gen

Re: Product branding

Hi Erik, remember that one of the things we discussed largely was about getting rid of "JS" suffixes since our tech is more than only a JS code generator Take into account that all web site efforts would be to name things as "Royale" and "Apache Royale". So regarding docs, FlexJS should become Roy

Re: [royale-website] branch asf-site updated (b041811 -> 06e2e6f)

Okay. We have some (ugly) placeholder HTML there.[1] (feel free to make it a bit nicer…) ;-) To publish changes to the site, all we need to do is push changes to the asf-site branch and it auto-updates. [1]http://royale.apache.org/ > On Sep 28, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Ha

Product branding

Hi, I'm trying to get back in the game and that makes me read a lot of the documentation. Obviously all of it currently refers to Apache FlexJS. I would suggest we come up with a new product brand ("RoyaleJS"?) that will set our efforts apart from previous efforts in the Apache Flex project. Tho

Re: Pull request notification?

I think we’re supposed to get notifications. I don’t know if it works or if I set it up right. I’m still learning the ropes… ;-) Harbs > On Sep 28, 2017, at 12:28 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to have a notification sent to the dev list (or a new, > dedicated list) when

Re: [royale-website] branch asf-site updated (b041811 -> 06e2e6f)

Yeah. I’m trying to figure out how we actually publish the site. So far I couldn’t figure it out. I just asked for help from INFRA. > On Sep 28, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > Thanks, that makes sense. > > EdB > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Piotr Zarzycki > wrote: >

Pull request notification?

Hi, Is it possible to have a notification sent to the dev list (or a new, dedicated list) when a pull request is added to GitHub? That would help us in speedily processing those. Thanks, EdB

Re: [royale-website] branch asf-site updated (b041811 -> 06e2e6f)

Thanks, that makes sense. EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I saw that Daniel from Infra mention that this branch is required for them. > Take a look into the comments [1] > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15146 > > Thanks, Piotr > >

Re: [royale-website] branch asf-site updated (b041811 -> 06e2e6f)

Hi Erik, I saw that Daniel from Infra mention that this branch is required for them. Take a look into the comments [1] [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15146 Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-28 11:11 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin : > I inadvertantly made a commit to "master". I assume the 'asf-

Re: [royale-website] branch asf-site updated (b041811 -> 06e2e6f)

I inadvertantly made a commit to "master". I assume the 'asf-site' branch is equal to the usual 'develop' branch? I have also merged the change from master to asf-site, simply to make those equal again. Maybe we should consider a renaming of 'asf-site' to 'develop' to make that consistent with the

Re: [royale-compiler] 02/02: got 'ant all' to work

Yep. Good point. That's weird cause I see changes when I'm clicking on hash in github [1], but I don't see it straight in develop branch [2] [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/tree/6e74505a4efdc03469cdef7ed3477fc6a804a322 [2] https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/commits/develop Pi

Re: [royale-compiler] 02/02: got 'ant all' to work

Something is odd here. I don’t see these changes in the origin. Is it possible something is not setup correctly? > On Sep 28, 2017, at 1:05 AM, aha...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aharui pushed a commit to branch develop > in rep