In resume, if we have horizontal, or vertical, as we shrink from
desktop-tablet to mobile, I think we should always go stacked through
responsiveness...
Absolutely.
No doubt on my opinion too.
Carlos Rovira escreveu no dia quarta, 9/09/2020
à(s) 14:54:
> Hi Hugo,
>
> thanks for the input.
>
>
Hi Hugo,
thanks for the input.
I think a "responsive" form will be very helpful. Mobile screens should
always be stacked since there's no space to layout elements horizontally,
and in a tiny mobile screen or label and controls are stacked, or we use a
layout like Material or Vuetify where the
Let me add that I use both stacked and non stacked FormItem layout.
In my opinion the default does not matter.
Both should be supported via property (I'm old fashion) because it's a very
important property but I can live with beads too.
It's important that both are supported and when the browser
"What's more Hugo is using my extension as well - cause he expressed need of
that - I have send him off the list that one. I'm not the only person who
uses in their app stacked Form."
Yes. I'm using your extension and it's working fine. Thank you very much
for that.
Please don't stop evolving
Hi Right,
I know this is normal :). Just saying that is just what I want to avoid for
things already in place. At least my objective is to reach 1.0 with the
current set working as expected, or IOW, that will be enough consistent and
will not cause current users to change their code because APIs
Carlos,
Having working that way is a loong journey. You cannot expect that
Royale application which is in production and using beta version of
framework - will wait with features to have improvement to component. -
There is much more custom extensions which we have made to move forward,
cause
Ok, that's what I want to avoid, having unofficial extensions for something
that we should provide out of the box.
We need to provide the flexibility to do all that kind of layouts and then
users could extend from that to adapt to some particular less generalistic
use cases, but the components
What's more Hugo is using my extension as well - cause he expressed need of
that - I have send him off the list that one. I'm not the only person who
uses in their app stacked Form.
śr., 9 wrz 2020 o 09:45 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> Yes I have more extension of current Form - I didn't commit
Yes I have more extension of current Form - I didn't commit this to Royale
in the results of our discussion a while ago. I have made significant
changes to FormView to improve it and created stacked form layout.
Anyway go ahead and do whatever you think - let me know and I will apply
your changes
Hi Piotr,
don't understand all you said. You mean you have a stacked form layout now?
that maybe is because you created your own extensions?
I think the objective here should be to work on a final implementation that
makes the Form/FormItem components behave in the most general way while
it's
Carlos,
If you won't do stacked in the first shot - I won't use it - We have a lot
of stacked stuff in our app. Without it it will just fail and apart of
changing code I will have to change more.. Sure if I have time I will help,
but I cannot promise I will get time for this from company.
Hi Piotr,
(sending this to both user and dev since it affects to current users and
we're discussing how to work on it)
I prefer your approach to work in a branch over the current Form code, when
finished it will require as well do some changes in final user code so in
the end changes should be
Sorry I should send it to Dev actually.
śr., 9 wrz 2020 o 08:34 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> Hi Carlos,
>
> If you think about changing name of the current component to FormDPCT and
> write new one with old name - I prefer if you do just the opposite. Name
> your new component in some way -
Hi all,
Jewel Form and FormItem specially, was implemented in a way that I never
was happy. Also others like Piotr had problems doing certain things.
So I was thinking of doing a big refactor, I think it will be important
before we reach 1.0. But before doing this I was thinking first of leaving
14 matches
Mail list logo
