Re: [sc-dev] Need UI name for new FDIST function

2009-04-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Regina, chiming in late on this.. On Wednesday, 2009-04-08 16:02:31 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: Leonard Mada schrieb: I would suggest DISTF(). It would be short and reflects the change in tail. But I worry, that people will not remember which one is 'right tail' and which one is

Re: [sc-dev] Implementation details for FDIST

2009-04-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Regina, On Monday, 2009-04-13 22:42:07 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: besides the UI-name problem I come across two other questions. For clarification: we're talking about ODF FDIST here, as opposed to LEGACY.FDIST (1) If the numerator degrees of freedom (r1) is 1, then the density

Re: [sc-dev] Implementation details for FDIST

2009-04-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Sunday, 2009-04-19 20:35:09 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: I can set the result to 0 or set illegal argument or perhaps set infinity. Please decide. I think letting the calculation just run into an error the same as occurs for the expression =0^-1 in ScInterpreter::ScExp() is fine,