Hi,
I've done some further analysis of the problem, and I think it is not
directly related to SENTRY-1291. The problem manifests in
CommonPrivilege.implies(privilege, model). My (cached) privilege looks like:
Server=server1->Db=authz->Table=words->Column=*->action=select
The "privilege" I want
This is a vote to release Apache Sentry 1.7.1.
Artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sentry/1.7.1/
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/sentry/tree/release-1.7.1
Issues fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SENTRY/versions/12342308
+1 from me.
Colm.
--
Colm O
Thanks Kalyan! I was thinking that if the cached privilege part does not
appear in the requested "part", and if is "all", then we should skip that
part and continue on to the next one. But maybe there is a better solution.
Colm.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
Colm,
I will look closer into this today and see If i can help you out.
-Kalyan
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done some further analysis of the problem, and I think it is not
> directly related to SENTRY-1291. The problem
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64661/
---
(Updated Dec. 18, 2017, 4:36 p.m.)
Review request for sentry, Alexander
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64661/
---
(Updated Dec. 18, 2017, 4:34 p.m.)
Review request for sentry, Alexander
> On Nov. 15, 2017, 7:11 p.m., Sergio Pena wrote:
> > The subject of the review board must match the JIRA subject. You could
> > either change the JIRA or the Review subject to match the correct fix.
> >
> > The getUniqueMSentryPrivilege() is still confusing. Any idea of the
> > difference in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64661/#review194079
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64661/#review194080
---