name to pack.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> If the user use the old link of saga, it will be redirect to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> servicecomb-pack
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> stuff
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It looks good to me.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> >
t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Any thought? If it is OK , I will start a vote for it at the end of
> >>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>> week.
> >
gt;>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>>>>>>>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:22 PM Willem Jiang
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>>>>> Sure, I just create a JIRA[1] for it.
> >>>>>>>> [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-976
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Willem Jiang
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>&g
I just create a JIRA[1] for it.
>>>>>>>> [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-976
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Willem Jiang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
gt; > > > Can you create a JIRA for this moving and it could make it much
> > > > clear
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the description ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> &g
; > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Willem Jiang 于2018年10月23日周二 下午9:04写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If we put them all together, we cannot name it as Saga. It could
&g
> > If we put them all together, we cannot name it as Saga. It
> could
> > > > > > > > confuse the user.
> > > > > > > > But I don't want to rename the Saga repo, as lot of people
> > > already
> > > > > > &
t; > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Willem Jiang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > > > > >
> > &
t; > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:45 PM bismy wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we put them all in one project so that w
; > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:45 PM bismy wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can we put them all in one project so that we can release all
> > components
> > > > > together?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > &
t; > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We can separate them in different modules in saga project.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we can use SAGA as the name for this project which
> implements
>
> > I think we can use SAGA as the name for this project which implements
> > > BASE transactions(saga, tcc, etc. ) although saga is one of them in
> > > history.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- 原始邮件 --
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > We can separate them in different modules in saga project.
> > >
> > >
> > > I think we can use SAGA as the name for this project which implements
> > BASE transactions(saga, tcc, etc. ) although saga is one of them in
&g
we can use SAGA as the name for this project which implements
>> BASE transactions(saga, tcc, etc. ) although saga is one of them in
>> history.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 原始邮件 --
>>> 发件人: "willem.jiang";
>>> 发送时间: 2018年10月23日(星
-- 原始邮件 ------
> > 发件人: "willem.jiang";
> > 发送时间: 2018年10月23日(星期二) 晚上7:31
> > 收件人: "dev";
> >
> > 主题: Re: Is saga named right?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about.
> > T
saga is one of them in history.
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "willem.jiang";
> 发送时间: 2018年10月23日(星期二) 晚上7:31
> 收件人: "dev";
>
> 主题: Re: Is saga named right?
>
>
>
> Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about.
> The new git repo could
.
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
: 2018??10??23??(??) 7:31
??: "dev";
????: Re: Is saga named right?
Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about.
The new git repo could be Pack, we can implement different
Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about.
The new git repo could be Pack, we can implement different Transaction
protocal there.
And the current Saga code could have a dependency of it or we just
move the Pack related code to Pack repo.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On
I think the core implementation of TCC and Saga (Pack) have the same
things, such as the similar annotations and the event names. So does it
make sense to have the common core module to implement the transaction
context, transaction event and the grpc communication protocol ?
And we could provide
Hi Team，
As TCC is quite different with the Saga implementation.
I'm planning to move the Pack code and TCC related code out of Saga repo.
In this way we can just keep Saga repo to have the implementation for Saga.
Any thought？
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Aug
Hi all.
as we all knows that,saga is a kind of transaction agreement,And we named
this project as saga because we support only this kind of agreement.
But now,we are going to support tcc, and maybe many other transaction
agreement like xa will be supported.
Whether we should change
23 matches
Mail list logo
